| Author |
Message |
latestwsop Banned
Joined: 26 Aug 2008 Posts: 578 Location: BustoTown --- Someone pull me outta here
|
Posted: Mon Oct 06, 2008 8:48 pm Post subject: What to do on a SUPER losing Streak? |
|
|
As some of you must have read my last few posts ...I have been on a HUGE downturn.....officially erasing most of my September to Oct 3rd Profits for the last three days. That put me on a negative with the losses in tournaments.
So, what do you people during such phases? how to come out of the abyss. Do you do something different than what you were doing during and before the run? Or do you just keep playing and then there's one hand which turns it around??
Is a positive session going to tell me that I've seen the back of the Losing streak?
I'm a little passive now in the ring games.....I want to get out of this mind set. I've just noticed I'm playing it safe with speculative hands like AT, AJ, and KQ... Gotta change that mentality. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
AwesomePowers High Card
Joined: 13 Aug 2008 Posts: 2
|
Posted: Mon Oct 06, 2008 9:23 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Well personally I think that is what bankroll management is all about, is being able to battle through these long droughts of either lousy hands or plain bad luck. Like Chris F. and many others have done, I have limited myself to never buying in a cash game with more than 5% of my total bankroll FOR cash games. If you are a decent player you should be able to cash/final table/win a tourney within 20-25 tries. So you could set aside the money that you want to specifically invest in tournaments and divide that by 20-25 and that number is the amount you can buy into a MTT. So even if you do have a super long streak of losing you will still have enough money to survive it and start winning consistently again. This is what has helped me keep above the water when I go through one of those. I wish you good luck.  |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Riddim Moderator
Joined: 04 Dec 2005 Posts: 10526 Location: Sweden
|
Posted: Tue Oct 07, 2008 4:11 am Post subject: |
|
|
Moved to general strategy discussion.
OP,
If you want some of my thoughts on downswings I think I started a thread about it in this forum (GSD, not NL/PL). There are plenty of other threads/posts about it as well.
AwesomePowers,
20-25 buy-ins for MTTs is a pretty good way to go broke if they're your main game. If you think a super long losing streak is less than that you haven't played many MTTs. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
MPMTL Message Board Junkie
Joined: 07 Oct 2008 Posts: 1823
|
Posted: Tue Oct 14, 2008 9:03 am Post subject: |
|
|
Whenever Im going through a serious losing streak, I always find it helps to move down to a lower limit and work my confidence back up (which usually takes a hit during a bad run of cards)
As for the 20-25 buy-ins for MTTs, I'm gonna agree with Riddim. I'm pretty sure that I would have gone absolutely bust if I followed those guidelines (obv assuming that MTTs is your main game). Personally I feel comfortable with 70-75 buy-ins for my favorite MTT, it may seem like a lot ... but it sort of ensures that I won't lose my bankroll during a bad run. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
mapp888 Flush
Joined: 01 Jun 2008 Posts: 131
|
Posted: Tue Oct 14, 2008 12:07 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| i hate moving down limits, but if u dont move down then u ll just go broke (ive just experienced it). if u play higher than the bankroll u have, then u do hav a chance of increasing ur bankroll very quickly, but eventually, when u catch bad runs again u ll go broke. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
MPMTL Message Board Junkie
Joined: 07 Oct 2008 Posts: 1823
|
Posted: Wed Oct 15, 2008 2:55 pm Post subject: |
|
|
AND on a SUPER SUPER SUPER losing streak (much like the one I'm experiencing now - I went from $50 initial up to $1850 or so in about a week and then slipped all the way back down to $1150-$1200) I just completely withdraw and take some time off. Honestly sometimes it takes more than moving down limits or doing something else, sometimes you just need a break and you gotta refocus.
Be back soon,
-MPMTL |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
robbywasabi Pair
Joined: 19 Dec 2007 Posts: 25
|
Posted: Fri Oct 17, 2008 9:44 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Quote: |
| AND on a SUPER SUPER SUPER losing streak (much like the one I'm experiencing now - I went from $50 initial up to $1850 or so in about a week and then slipped all the way back down to $1150-$1200) I just completely withdraw and take some time off. Honestly sometimes it takes more than moving down limits or doing something else, sometimes you just need a break and you gotta refocus. |
If you went from 50 dollars to 1850 in a week then I think you're probably playing out of your bankroll. If this is the case then a downswing from 1850 to 1200 probably isn't that significant and you have just cooled off from a hot hot run. variance. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
theskipirate Pair
Joined: 15 Feb 2008 Posts: 41
|
Posted: Sat Oct 18, 2008 4:44 am Post subject: |
|
|
If your on a super down swing the only thing I would suggest is taking a week off to clear you head, you must have other hobbies/pastimes outside poker which could entertain you for at least a week! (probably not what you want to hear lol). But I find if you continue playing it will almost defaintely effect your overall game and any decisions you make.
| Quote: |
$50 initial up to $1850 or so in about a week
|
If you were sticking to correct (*yawn*, I know) bankroll management there is no way you could have done that. For MTT you should be buying in for $1 and STT $2. At $50 you were not even rolled enough for the lowest cash games. I'm not doubting that your good at the game coz you obviously did well but there is a reason why everyone talks about playing within the bankroll so much. Going from 1850 down to 1200 should show you that!
A lot of players at the low limit who win big in one MTT think they can handle the higher limits and then lose it all in a matter of days so I think you made the right choice cashing out there. I would have probably left about $150 to play with and enjoy the rest of the money  |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
latestwsop Banned
Joined: 26 Aug 2008 Posts: 578 Location: BustoTown --- Someone pull me outta here
|
Posted: Sun Oct 19, 2008 6:22 pm Post subject: |
|
|
alright alright ...now talk about me .. .the OP  |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Peepers_au Message Board Junkie
Joined: 15 Feb 2008 Posts: 1525 Location: Australia
|
Posted: Mon Oct 20, 2008 3:07 am Post subject: |
|
|
Until you learn to play within your bankroll, any other advice you get will be near useless.
It is your greatest problem and until you accept that I'd argue there's no helping you. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
tito_lays Two Pair
Joined: 13 Jan 2008 Posts: 64
|
Posted: Mon Oct 20, 2008 10:49 am Post subject: |
|
|
Is $50 your bankroll? I hear all this negative commentary on your bankroll management...but I'd like to know why depositing $50 equals your complete bankroll?
...if I have $500 on Poker Stars, and $50 on Full Tilt... and $1000 sitting at home waiting to be deposited or used live....wouldn't my bankroll be 1750?...I mean, if you say "I'm saving $50 out of my check every week to play poker, and that's my bankroll"...wouldn't your yearly bankroll be $2600? And 2% - 5% of that would be near $100, so playing $50 each week would be well within your bankroll...and you are thus rolled for any action you decide on.
furthermore, I think the emphasis on bankroll here is from a "poker pro" perspective, where they rely on only poker income. But most of us are employed...but still want to get some poker action in. So I got to figure my bankroll is made out of my living when I start playing. I don't see the difference between putting $50 on and playing it all in one day...knowing my job is going to help supply the rest of my "bankroll", or saving up 3k to put on all at one time.
Certainly there need to be limits...but it doesn't have to be these cut and dry bankroll methods developed by the pro's. If you're just starting out and are employed, your "bankroll" should just be a limit you put on yourself per week...month...or year, whatever you can responsibly afford. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
AllInDrawinDead Poker Nerd
Joined: 22 Sep 2005 Posts: 2852 Location: crushing LHE
|
Posted: Tue Oct 21, 2008 3:46 am Post subject: |
|
|
| If you are on a prolonged losing streak and it won't stop you should probably evaluate your play carefully. This is not to say you are a bad player, but you may be playing bad at the time. It's possible that you are playing fast trying to make your money back after losing some tough hands and playing more marginal gambling situations. It's also possible that you might have some leaks in your game that you need to plug that you may not have noticed before. No one plays every hand perfect every time so be honest with yourself and work towards fixing those leaks and becoming a profitable player again. Good luck at the tables! |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Riddim Moderator
Joined: 04 Dec 2005 Posts: 10526 Location: Sweden
|
Posted: Wed Oct 22, 2008 1:16 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Bump since this is bound to happen again. OP, a good way to not have losing streaks that completely decimate your bankroll is to not play in games where you're not a winning player and for which you probably aren't rolled. These assumptions are both based on the thread you started in NL/PL recently btw, as well as your overall body of posts here on the forums. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
LostOstrich Banned
Joined: 11 Aug 2007 Posts: 5480 Location: 4-bet bluff-shoving J5os
|
Posted: Wed Oct 22, 2008 1:35 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| tito_lays wrote: |
Is $50 your bankroll? I hear all this negative commentary on your bankroll management...but I'd like to know why depositing $50 equals your complete bankroll?
...if I have $500 on Poker Stars, and $50 on Full Tilt... and $1000 sitting at home waiting to be deposited or used live....wouldn't my bankroll be 1750?...I mean, if you say "I'm saving $50 out of my check every week to play poker, and that's my bankroll"...wouldn't your yearly bankroll be $2600? And 2% - 5% of that would be near $100, so playing $50 each week would be well within your bankroll...and you are thus rolled for any action you decide on.
furthermore, I think the emphasis on bankroll here is from a "poker pro" perspective, where they rely on only poker income. But most of us are employed...but still want to get some poker action in. So I got to figure my bankroll is made out of my living when I start playing. I don't see the difference between putting $50 on and playing it all in one day...knowing my job is going to help supply the rest of my "bankroll", or saving up 3k to put on all at one time.
Certainly there need to be limits...but it doesn't have to be these cut and dry bankroll methods developed by the pro's. If you're just starting out and are employed, your "bankroll" should just be a limit you put on yourself per week...month...or year, whatever you can responsibly afford. |
I agree with the general point here. However, whatever your "roll" is, you need to avoid playing at levels at which you will lose. And even if you're the greatest player in the world, you need to play at a level that you can afford. With a little common sense, it's not too hard to get the right balance. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
bigpairde Moderator
Joined: 26 Apr 2008 Posts: 10100
|
Posted: Wed Oct 22, 2008 1:39 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I usually switch games: from sit and goes to cash game,....from omaha to holdem,...things like that. I also play lower limits (even if the bankroll would still allow more) just to built up confidence.
And I also play more satellites with FT Points entry, to avoid any further damage to my bankroll |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|