Online Poker Room
Our Poker Players
Texas Hold Em Download
How To Play Poker
Full Tilt Poker
Real Money Poker Games
News & Promotions
Poker Store
Online Poker Affiliates
Full Tilt Poker
Online Poker Forum at Full Tilt Poker
  FAQFAQ   SearchSearch    RegisterRegister   ProfileProfile  Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages  Log inLog in 

Online Poker Forum - Skill To Luck Ratio

 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Online Poker Forum Home -> Poker Stories
Author Message
Jack Sparrow 24
High Card


Joined: 10 May 2008
Posts: 17
Location: Fresno, California

PostPosted: Mon May 12, 2008 8:13 pm    Post subject: Skill To Luck Ratio Reply with quote

I think there is a lot of bad poker being played on this site and all the rest of them online. Not to mention the small buy in home games that thousands of people play each weekend around the country/world. If you seat a table full of professional poker players, the skill to luck ratio has to be pretty close to 80:20. 80% skill is involved around that table and only 20% luck. Sure bad beats happen day in and day out at ANY poker table but at some of these lower level buy in games there are way too many people in the hand that really shouldn't be. The skill to luck ratio has to be somewhere near 50:50. There are just too many people that are playing crap hands and end up winning the pot cuz of some lucky cards come for them and they end up taking the pot. For example: I just don't see anyone having any business being in the hand when they have 9,3 offsuit in first position. (Unless they are trying to bluff at the pot and push everyone out of the hand). Even in cash games. But you see it day in and day out, someone limping in with 9,3 offsuit in early position and then end up calling a raise before the flop, only to hit a 3 on the flop and play it all the way thru and get a miracle 9 on the river to crack someone's Aces. I guess my point to this rant is that when you're playing low buy in games with a bunch of people that don't understand 1/50th of what poker strategy is all about, you have a 50/50 shot at winning the hand that you're in. Even if you're pocket aces are a 85% favorite to win before the flop. Unfortunately my lifestyle cannot afford to play in bigger buy in games, but I'm surely accumulating money in my account so I can play in bigger games. Hopefully that bad play will subside a whole lot when playing at those tables. Good luck to me, and good luck to everyone who is witnessing the same things as I am at the lower level tables.

I absolutely cannot stand Phil Helmuth but I do have to give him credit for what he said once, "If it wasn't for luck, I'd win every hand."

Your thoughts?
Back to top
Flying_Kiwi
Message Board Junkie


Joined: 03 Sep 2006
Posts: 6522
Location: somewhere spacific

PostPosted: Mon May 12, 2008 8:17 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

It's 50/50.
Back to top
Badlydrawnboy
Flush


Joined: 28 Jan 2008
Posts: 127

PostPosted: Mon May 12, 2008 9:17 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Don't know who it was that said it, but "At the higher levels, the bad players don't become better, they just become tighter".

So it will become more difficult to extract money from them playing 93o.

I guess playing the low stakes is essentially a lesson in how not to overplay good starting hands.
Back to top
Blackray
Full House


Joined: 20 Mar 2008
Posts: 169
Location: Bergen, Norway

PostPosted: Tue May 13, 2008 3:44 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

As Sklansky says in SSHL, your profit comes from your opponents mistakes. It's a common misconception by losing players to think that they'll be winning players at higher stakes where "people respect your raises and cbet's".
Back to top
alex089
High Card


Joined: 30 Jan 2008
Posts: 8

PostPosted: Tue May 13, 2008 3:23 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

I think the luck to skill ratio is a matter of opinion.

I was watching a high stakes cash game recently and "Devilfish" said that Holdem was 40% skill and 60% luck.

As for Phil Helmuth, well his attitude and persona say more about him than I ever could.
Back to top
Jack Sparrow 24
High Card


Joined: 10 May 2008
Posts: 17
Location: Fresno, California

PostPosted: Tue May 13, 2008 6:30 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Badlydrawnboy wrote:
Don't know who it was that said it, but "At the higher levels, the bad players don't become better, they just become tighter".

So it will become more difficult to extract money from them playing 93o.

I guess playing the low stakes is essentially a lesson in how not to overplay good starting hands.


If they become tighter at higher level games, they won't be in the hand with 9,3 offsuit. Problem of bad poker solved.
Back to top
StevieWard
Message Board Junkie


Joined: 12 Jul 2007
Posts: 1552

PostPosted: Tue May 13, 2008 7:16 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

75/25.
Back to top
Badlydrawnboy
Flush


Joined: 28 Jan 2008
Posts: 127

PostPosted: Tue May 13, 2008 7:25 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Jack Sparrow 24 wrote:
Badlydrawnboy wrote:
Don't know who it was that said it, but "At the higher levels, the bad players don't become better, they just become tighter".

So it will become more difficult to extract money from them playing 93o.

I guess playing the low stakes is essentially a lesson in how not to overplay good starting hands.


If they become tighter at higher level games, they won't be in the hand with 9,3 offsuit. Problem of bad poker solved.


And a new problem born: how to make money now?
Back to top
RunnerJohn
Two Pair


Joined: 16 Apr 2008
Posts: 70
Location: Cartersville, Georgia

PostPosted: Wed May 14, 2008 6:52 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

I have a theory about the skill to luck ratio. It's my own opinion, of course, but it seems common sense to me.

If everyone at a table is of equal skill, then luck has to be a much bigger factor.

If you put 9 sharks at a table (of equal or close skill level), then you'll probably see a very tight game. The winner will be the one who gets the better cards (luck).

If you put 9 fish at a table (of equal or no skill), then you'll probably see a fairly wild game. The winner will be the one who hits the best flops, turns, and rivers (luck).

If you put 9 people of varying levels of skill at a table, then skill will be the determining factor. The higher the skill level of the player, the more likely that player will end up winning.

Doesn't that just make sense?
Back to top
gamblingparlour
Flush


Joined: 17 Apr 2008
Posts: 147

PostPosted: Thu May 15, 2008 12:10 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

At first I figured it was something like 70/30 skill to luck ratio, but the more experienced I am becoming the more I reckon it's more like 50/50.
Back to top
dcdoorknob
Message Board Junkie


Joined: 11 May 2007
Posts: 1128
Location: Mississippi

PostPosted: Thu May 15, 2008 12:29 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

gamblingparlour wrote:
At first I figured it was something like 70/30 skill to luck ratio, but the more experienced I am becoming the more I reckon it's more like 50/50.


That's odd, the more experienced I get the more I realize how much skill is involved. It might have something to do with how one makes use of said experience.
Back to top
gamblingparlour
Flush


Joined: 17 Apr 2008
Posts: 147

PostPosted: Thu May 15, 2008 12:35 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

dcdoorknob wrote:
gamblingparlour wrote:
At first I figured it was something like 70/30 skill to luck ratio, but the more experienced I am becoming the more I reckon it's more like 50/50.


That's odd, the more experienced I get the more I realize how much skill is involved. It might have something to do with how one makes use of said experience.


Let's play heads up you shark.
Back to top
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Online Poker Forum Home -> Poker Stories All times are GMT - 5 Hours
Page 1 of 1

 


Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group