Online Poker Forum - Poker Philosophy

 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Online Poker Forum Home -> General Strategy Discussion
Author Message
Flying_Kiwi
Bird of Mystery


Joined: 03 Sep 2006
Posts: 8457
Location: Spewing bonus $

PostPosted: Sun Jul 26, 2009 5:03 pm    Post subject: Poker Philosophy Reply with quote

1. There is no self.
2. There is a bankroll.
3. There is no self.
4. There is an image.
5. There is no self.
Back to top
nolan6
Message Board Junkie


Joined: 12 May 2009
Posts: 1378
Location: NothernEngland

PostPosted: Sun Jul 26, 2009 5:19 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

i agree
Back to top
Flying_Kiwi
Bird of Mystery


Joined: 03 Sep 2006
Posts: 8457
Location: Spewing bonus $

PostPosted: Sun Jul 26, 2009 5:43 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

6. There is no "my bankroll" because there is no self.
7. There is no self.
8. There is no "my image" because there is no self.
9. There is no self.
10. The bankroll displays an image. There is no "my bankroll" or "my image". There is even no "the image of a bankroll" because "the image" is incorrect. The bankroll only displays an image.
11. There is no self.
Back to top
Flying_Kiwi
Bird of Mystery


Joined: 03 Sep 2006
Posts: 8457
Location: Spewing bonus $

PostPosted: Sun Jul 26, 2009 5:46 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

12. There are no opponents & no opposing images.
13. There is no opposition.
14. There are other bankrolls displaying other images.
15. There is no opposition
16. There is no self.
17. There are only bankrolls displaying images.
Back to top
Flying_Kiwi
Bird of Mystery


Joined: 03 Sep 2006
Posts: 8457
Location: Spewing bonus $

PostPosted: Sun Jul 26, 2009 5:54 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

18. I have no attachment to "my image" because I don't have one.
19. I have no attachment to "an image" because there is no self.
20. A bankroll has no attachment to an image or vice-versa because neither one owns the other.
21. There is no self.
Back to top
Moshiach
Message Board Junkie


Joined: 04 Oct 2005
Posts: 4550
Location: Vic, Australia

PostPosted: Sun Jul 26, 2009 6:28 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

someone's been reading some buddhist dialogues
Back to top
Kalikin
High Card


Joined: 10 Aug 2009
Posts: 2

PostPosted: Mon Aug 10, 2009 10:02 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

cool thought.
Back to top
Fimbu
Two Pair


Joined: 27 Aug 2008
Posts: 55
Location: Oslo, Norway

PostPosted: Mon Aug 10, 2009 10:30 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Obsessive..
Back to top
vectorspace
Message Board Junkie


Joined: 17 Dec 2007
Posts: 1010
Location: Texas

PostPosted: Mon Aug 10, 2009 12:08 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

What do you mean by "there is no self"? Does that mean the strength of your hand depends on your opponents cards? For example, TT is great on the button in an unopened pot, but is garbage if the action has been 3 bet to you.
Back to top
PokerJessO
Royal Flush


Joined: 28 Jun 2007
Posts: 618

PostPosted: Mon Aug 10, 2009 1:23 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Moshiach wrote:
someone's been reading some buddhist dialogues

Or smokin the good stuff......
Back to top
Flying_Kiwi
Bird of Mystery


Joined: 03 Sep 2006
Posts: 8457
Location: Spewing bonus $

PostPosted: Mon Aug 10, 2009 4:10 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

vectorspace wrote:
What do you mean by "there is no self"? Does that mean the strength of your hand depends on your opponents cards? For example, TT is great on the button in an unopened pot, but is garbage if the action has been 3 bet to you.


Pretty much like you're saying. It means there so should be no attachment of the self to the cards or bankroll.

The opposite (bringing the self to the poker table) would be saying things like:
-"I've won with this hand lots before, it's a lucky hand for me."
-"I always get unlucky in these spots."
-"KK never wins for me."
-"This is the biggest bankroll I've ever had, I don't want to move up because it seems like a lot of money to me IRL."
etc.
Back to top
Flying_Kiwi
Bird of Mystery


Joined: 03 Sep 2006
Posts: 8457
Location: Spewing bonus $

PostPosted: Mon Aug 10, 2009 4:11 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

PokerJessO wrote:
Moshiach wrote:
someone's been reading some buddhist dialogues

Or smokin the good stuff......


Or maybe both at the same time.
Back to top
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Online Poker Forum Home -> General Strategy Discussion All times are GMT - 4 Hours
Page 1 of 1

 
Powered by phpBB Copyright 2001, 2005 phpBB Group