| Author |
Message |
VRod105 Royal Flush
Joined: 26 Mar 2006 Posts: 874 Location: St. Louis, MO
|
Posted: Sat Dec 13, 2008 7:40 pm Post subject: Poker as a game of skill |
|
|
I thought this article was interesting. It talks about the fact that as players calculate their bets and odds very few hands goto showdown, and if all hands went to showdown the game would be relegated to luck. I wonder if the number of hands going to showdown is higher for online poker? Is that one of the reasons there are more Bad Beats online? Is this problem built into all forms of poker where there are weak players? Would playing no limit games amplify this issue?
Thoughts?
http://www.pokerlistings.com/evidence-in-poker-game-of-skill-33977 |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
rockycatt 91 vette arctic white
Joined: 03 Jan 2007 Posts: 4189 Location: WE WANT RAKE BACK
|
Posted: Sat Dec 13, 2008 8:13 pm Post subject: |
|
|
FROM WHAT YOU SAID bet size =odds .luck needed hands held by experienced players get folded,=fewer show down hands
be interesting if they had a face up showdown sit and go pay 1.00 and watch [lottery style ] |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Abufznuf Straight Flush
Joined: 01 Apr 2007 Posts: 391
|
Posted: Sat Dec 13, 2008 8:32 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| rockycatt wrote: |
FROM WHAT YOU SAID bet size =odds .luck needed hands held by experienced players get folded,=fewer show down hands
be interesting if they had a face up showdown sit and go pay 1.00 and watch [lottery style ] |
Just get 9 forumers to do a sng and do 3 bb flippamentz every hand everyone calls pre and checks it down. Hard to get more luck factor than that. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
VRod105 Royal Flush
Joined: 26 Mar 2006 Posts: 874 Location: St. Louis, MO
|
Posted: Sat Dec 13, 2008 9:19 pm Post subject: |
|
|
You lost me with some of that RockyCatt.
What the article said was most hands are not played to showdown. The only way to not play a hand to showdown is to fold a player. Skilled players should fold if they are not getting the correct odds, unless they have a good read or plan to steal the hand, ... |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
intopot Flush
Joined: 20 Jan 2007 Posts: 140 Location: Florida
|
Posted: Sat Dec 13, 2008 11:40 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Folding will definetly keep you fromgetting a bad beat. It might also prevent you from winiing the pot. these two thinks are certainties |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Annovic High Card
Joined: 18 Dec 2008 Posts: 5
|
Posted: Thu Dec 18, 2008 7:39 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| intopot wrote: |
| Folding will definetly keep you fromgetting a bad beat. It might also prevent you from winiing the pot. these two thinks are certainties |
+1 |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Big Slick x13x Forum Icon
Joined: 18 Jun 2006 Posts: 5605 Location: The U.S.A.
|
Posted: Thu Dec 18, 2008 7:47 pm Post subject: |
|
|
To answer your questions: yes, yes, yes, no the opposite.
being online people have anonymity, which they use to be retards either in their actions or their play. More players = more bad players = more bad calls that get there so yes another reason for more bad beats online. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
tehchipdonk Full House
Joined: 01 Jul 2008 Posts: 178
|
Posted: Fri Dec 19, 2008 4:17 am Post subject: |
|
|
| it's not, it's still gambling at the end of the day. ever wondered why poker is being played in the casino instead of in the office? yea go figure.. and even, full tilt states poker is gambling stating that under 18 year olds can't play on their real money site instead the under 18s can play on their play money portal... |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
LostOstrich Banned
Joined: 11 Aug 2007 Posts: 5480 Location: 4-bet bluff-shoving J5os
|
Posted: Fri Dec 19, 2008 5:23 am Post subject: |
|
|
| It's obviously a gambling game that involves a large element of skill. Defining it as purely a game of skill would be wrong, as obviously there is a significant element of chance invloved. And vice versa. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
griffinlord Message Board Junkie
Joined: 20 Jul 2005 Posts: 2466 Location: The Great Plains of South Dakota
|
Posted: Fri Dec 19, 2008 12:27 pm Post subject: |
|
|
The most informative part of the article:
| Quote: |
Michael DeDonno, a doctoral student from Case Western Reserve University, conducted two poker-related studies with college students and published the results in an article entitled "Poker Is a Skill," cowritten with psychologist Douglas Detterman, also of Case Western Reserve. The article was later picked up by the Gaming Law Review journal, which had been looking into the luck versus skill argument for some time.
"This article provides empirical evidence that it is skill and not luck," concluded DeDonno based on his two studies, which demonstrated different outcomes after novice poker players received some strategy lessons. Simply put, those who learned poker strategy made better decisions and were more successful than those who were not taught strategy. |
You can try to explain all day how there is a skill element in poker, just like bridge, backgammon, or a dozen other games I could mention if my brain worked this early in the morning. But folks who don't like gambling are going to focus on the element of chance and refuse to understand the skill element.
Bring in scientifically credible research, and the court must pay attention. (Or at least that's my understanding of some U.S. Supreme Court rulings in the past decade or so.)
Not that science will convince everyone, some people still believe the world is flat, but replicate the study above a few times and the legal system will have no choice but to recognize that there is an element of skill in poker. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
kwik Straight Flush
Joined: 30 Nov 2008 Posts: 481 Location: long island, ny
|
Posted: Fri Jan 23, 2009 3:46 pm Post subject: |
|
|
"This article provides empirical evidence that it is skill and not luck," concluded DeDonno based on his two studies, which demonstrated different outcomes after novice poker players received some strategy lessons. Simply put, those who learned poker strategy made better decisions and were more successful than those who were not taught strategy.
so there you go, the skill part of playing poker is .. learning how to play poker..skill is getting your money in the pot with the best hand after that is allllll luck |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Skallagrim High Card
Joined: 19 Jan 2007 Posts: 16
|
Posted: Tue Feb 10, 2009 2:36 pm Post subject: |
|
|
To understand what is going on here you have to understand the legal test (called the "predominance test"). The test says a game is gambling when the OUTCOME(S) of the game are mostly due to chance. A game is not gambling if the outcomes are mostly due to skill.
Two things happen in a poker game: 1) cards are dealt - that is chance 2) players PLAY their cards by choosing to either bet, call, raise, fold, or (when possible) check - that is skill.
Think of golf if the above doesnt make sense to you: wind, pin and tee placement, hardness/softness of the greens, and odd bits of terrain that make for crazy bounces - thats chance; swinging a club is skill. Though both are factors, which is the more important factor in determining your score?
So for poker, ask yourself this: which is more important to the outcome of a typical game or tournament: how the cards are dealt, or how the cards are played?
If you think its how the cards are dealt, please also include your screen name and the times you usually play .
You can read formal scientific, logical, and statistical proofs about this argument here:
http://pokerplayersalliance.org/forums/forum/55
Skallagrim |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
subsane High Card
Joined: 03 Apr 2009 Posts: 2
|
Posted: Fri Apr 03, 2009 1:29 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Skallagrim wrote: |
To understand what is going on here you have to understand the legal test (called the "predominance test"). The test says a game is gambling when the OUTCOME(S) of the game are mostly due to chance. A game is not gambling if the outcomes are mostly due to skill.
Two things happen in a poker game: 1) cards are dealt - that is chance 2) players PLAY their cards by choosing to either bet, call, raise, fold, or (when possible) check - that is skill.
Think of golf if the above doesnt make sense to you: wind, pin and tee placement, hardness/softness of the greens, and odd bits of terrain that make for crazy bounces - thats chance; swinging a club is skill. Though both are factors, which is the more important factor in determining your score?
So for poker, ask yourself this: which is more important to the outcome of a typical game or tournament: how the cards are dealt, or how the cards are played?
If you think its how the cards are dealt, please also include your screen name and the times you usually play .
You can read formal scientific, logical, and statistical proofs about this argument here:
http://pokerplayersalliance.org/forums/forum/55
Skallagrim |
That is the smartest thing I've heard all day. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|