| Author |
Message |
ThunderCrew
Message Board Junkie
Joined: 04 May 2006
Posts: 3366
Location: Illinois, Usa
|
 Posted: Sat May 13, 2006 2:23 am Post subject: Quad with an ace kicker vs Quad on the river lol |
 |
|
Full Tilt Poker
Pot Limit Holdem Ring game
Blinds: $0/$
9 players
Pre-flop: (9 players) ThunderCrew is MP1 with 5 A
UTG+1 raises to $105, ThunderCrew calls $105 (pot was $105), 2 folds, CO calls $105 (pot was $210), Button calls $105 (pot was $315), SB calls $105 (pot was $420).
Flop: Q 5 5 ($525, 6 players)
UTG+1 bets $250, ThunderCrew raises all-in $1395, 3 folds, UTG+1 calls all-in $1145.
Turn: 5 ($3315, 1 player + 2 all-in - Main pot: $3315)
River: Q ($3315, 1 player + 2 all-in - Main pot: $3315)
Results:
Final pot: $3315
UTG+1 showed Q Q and won (3,360) with four of a kind, Queens
ThunderCrew showed 5 A and lost with four of a kind, Fives
EDIT ^^^ i re edited the river turn mix up no idea why it
flipped in the hand converter 
I did kind of jump the gun on the re raise all in but hell with
the trips ace kicker lol.
Didnt want to slow play to allow a straight or flush out draw.
Besides would been all in on turn or river if he pushed in lol.
Was a verry funny hand seeing the 4th 5 drop i was like sweet
esaped the trip queens. Then BAM river queen setting up the
end of the funniest hand i been in myself so far.
Last edited by ThunderCrew on Sat May 13, 2006 3:32 pm; edited 2 times in total |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
mdroz247
Full House
Joined: 02 Jan 2006
Posts: 152
|
| Posted: Sat May 13, 2006 7:44 am Post subject: Re: Quad with an ace kicker vs Quad on the river lol |
|
|
| ThunderCrew wrote: |
I did kind of jump the gun on the re raise all in but hell with
the trips ace kicker lol.
Didnt want to slow play to allow a straight or flush out draw.
Besides would been all in on turn or river if he pushed in lol.
Was a verry funny hand seeing the 4th 5 drop i was like sweet
esaped the trip queens. Then BAM river queen setting up the
end of the funniest hand i been in myself so far. |
Well on the flop, there were no draws to be afraid of. It came a rainbow and needed runner runner for straight. It also looks like the turn was a queen not a five. So the river couldnt even help you. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
OpDS311
Message Board Junkie
Joined: 23 Jan 2006
Posts: 4354
Location: Colbert Nation
|
| Posted: Sat May 13, 2006 10:02 am Post subject: |
|
|
| What are the blinds? |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
duelindalton
Pair
Joined: 30 Mar 2006
Posts: 38
Location: Tampa
|
| Posted: Sat May 13, 2006 11:28 am Post subject: |
|
|
| Thats just a hand thats hard to get away from once you seen the flop. Nothing you can do and prolly nothing to learn cuz you didnt do anything wrong so will prolly make same move in same situation again. Just happens sometimes. Does show ya what can happen with ace rag even when board goes your way. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Strasse
Forum Ego
Joined: 16 Nov 2005
Posts: 5152
Location: Austin, TX
|
| Posted: Sat May 13, 2006 1:07 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Why did you call from early position with A5 offsuit? |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
ambitious207
Message Board Junkie
Joined: 07 Mar 2006
Posts: 2130
Location: Maine
|
| Posted: Sat May 13, 2006 1:10 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| He is playing for play chips. Put it together. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
ThunderCrew
Message Board Junkie
Joined: 04 May 2006
Posts: 3366
Location: Illinois, Usa
|
| Posted: Sat May 13, 2006 3:21 pm Post subject: |
|
|
1st off im not sure why the queen and 5 got reversed there.
The turn was 5 and the river was queen.
I had quads before the other player.
2nd area of question ace 5 came in only for the raise of the pocket
queens no re-raise.
basicaly it went down like this
pocket queens raised to 120 i called 120 then the flop hit
5 5 queen pocket queens im guessing was gonna slow play with the small
post bet of 250 but with my trip 5's ace kicker i said screw it all in.
He of course calls it with trip ladies lol.
then i was like crap trip lady against trip 5 im beat.
BAM turn is a 5 im like WOW quad 5's i escaped a beating then BAM again
River Lady for quad queens over quad 5's.
Really not sure why sometimes it comes out wrong in that converter.
| Quote: |
| He is playing for play chips. Put it together. |
Its true so far i am only playing for chips
But trust me im not one of the all in boys calling any crap
and all in pre flop just cause i got pockets suits or an ace king etc.
I have plenty of top #1 spots as well as many final table spots
on the 90 people tourneys and its not cause i get alot of all in
lucky hands pre flop or even post flop.
i only went all in post flop there cause it seemed good and he raised
1st so i was like lets see how committed he is to his one queen or pocket cards he was pairing with the pocket 5's or maybe he had a 5 also.
That all in was not a bad all in just came out bad for me lol.
as far as calling with ace 5 i did it because i love ace 2 - ace 5
for a few reasons.
1 the inside straights two ive flopped full houses with them many times.
3 can hit a straight on either end of the spectrum low or high.
i will call a weak 120 call to come in to see flop with ace 5 if he went all
in or raised an obscene amount no i wouldnt have come in on ace 5.
It was only 120. and its only chips. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Jaconda78
Message Board Junkie
Joined: 06 Jul 2005
Posts: 4177
|
| Posted: Sat May 13, 2006 6:02 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| You know he didn't have "trip ladies" right? He had a full house off the flop. Don't play crappy hands like A5. 'Nuff said. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
ThunderCrew
Message Board Junkie
Joined: 04 May 2006
Posts: 3366
Location: Illinois, Usa
|
| Posted: Sun May 14, 2006 12:15 am Post subject: |
|
|
Lol no the point is i didnt think he had ladies at all cept maybe one.
His small raise he did i assumed he had 2 pairs either pockets
(hoping not queens lol) Or a single queen with 5's on board.
I already said it was a hasty all in once above  |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
FAQ
Search
Register
Profile
Log in to check your private messages
Log in
