| Author |
Message |
krazybangs Message Board Junkie
Joined: 21 Nov 2005 Posts: 1373 Location: Beyond Tilt
|
Posted: Tue May 02, 2006 6:13 pm Post subject: Tables |
|
|
I like to run 3-4 Fixed limit 9 person tables
Problem is, I really dont enjoy seeing the same people at every table, yes its online and it happens...
so...
Anyone think they ahve noticed any bots at the 1/2 2/4 Limit tables as well?
and other than that, do you liek playing the same epople or is there a better time frame to take on the recreatioal players and fish? |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
leanandmean Pair
Joined: 07 Mar 2006 Posts: 24 Location: Texas
|
Posted: Tue May 02, 2006 9:00 pm Post subject: funny... |
|
|
| I have been amazed at how seldom i see the same people. I put note tabs on a lot and seldom see more that one player I've flagged. Do you think there are bots here? What exactly is a bot anyway? |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
griffinlord Message Board Junkie
Joined: 19 Jul 2005 Posts: 2459 Location: The Great Plains of South Dakota
|
Posted: Tue May 02, 2006 11:36 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I two table and only occassionally notice the same person at both tables. I can't think of a single time that I've played two people at both tables although I suppose it has happened.
I think that the (small) number of active limit tables almost forces folks playing multiple tables to play each other. If there were more limit players I think there would be less duplication. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
deadmoney314 Message Board Junkie
Joined: 16 Jul 2005 Posts: 3228 Location: grunching through reply posts
|
Posted: Tue May 02, 2006 11:50 pm Post subject: ... |
|
|
| I've had 3 tables where 2 other players were on each of them. The fewer games available, the more common this is. As long as they are worse players, its a good thing to see them at every one of your tables. Its not the end of the world if they are better than you too, just try to be better than half of your opponents and you might squeak by. If you are going to play 9 max, multi tabling is the only way to go. You might want to try 6 max as it gets you more decisions per hour which is a good thing if you feel proficient at your limit. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
leanandmean Pair
Joined: 07 Mar 2006 Posts: 24 Location: Texas
|
Posted: Wed May 03, 2006 2:10 pm Post subject: six player |
|
|
| You mention 6 player, deadmoney, which brings up a question, how do you adjust your strategy from 9 to 6? I have avoided the 6 because it seem to me i would just lose blind ;money faster waiting for a playable hand. But i have noticed there are more 6 player tables available. So i would like to try it. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
krazybangs Message Board Junkie
Joined: 21 Nov 2005 Posts: 1373 Location: Beyond Tilt
|
Posted: Wed May 03, 2006 2:46 pm Post subject: Lean... |
|
|
I tend to like the 6 man tables but I only play one at a time... I want to focus my hands... be agressive... less cards out, more playable hands and more catachable cards.... IMO....
But you need to read your players... any two cards can win but it still uses 5. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Kloaked Spirit Royal Flush
Joined: 03 Nov 2005 Posts: 869
|
Posted: Wed May 03, 2006 3:37 pm Post subject: Re: six player |
|
|
| leanandmean wrote: |
| You mention 6 player, deadmoney, which brings up a question, how do you adjust your strategy from 9 to 6? I have avoided the 6 because it seem to me i would just lose blind ;money faster waiting for a playable hand. But i have noticed there are more 6 player tables available. So i would like to try it. |
A shift in aggression is the biggest difference between the two games. You get far more aggressive with marginal hands and things like middle pair gain more showdown value. Suitedness also goes down in value with starting hands. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
deadmoney314 Message Board Junkie
Joined: 16 Jul 2005 Posts: 3228 Location: grunching through reply posts
|
Posted: Wed May 03, 2006 10:31 pm Post subject: ... |
|
|
| Like KS said, aggression factor should go up and one needs to play a wider range of cards (loosen up). There is, of course, a slippery slope to fall down in not finding a good mix for your set of opponents. My theory with 6max is that I get faced with more decisions per hour than I would with 9max and that is a good thing if I am better than half the table. If you are making better decisions than your opponents on a more rapid pace you should in theory make money faster. My PT stats reflected this so I stayed at 6max. PT has been an invaluable tool to see what hands are profitable in each position but experience more than anything is the biggest factor because you will have to constantly adjust to the different opponents available. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
jwine8 Guest
|
Posted: Wed May 03, 2006 11:16 pm Post subject: questions |
|
|
| can someone answer some questions i have about this site ? |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
griffinlord Message Board Junkie
Joined: 19 Jul 2005 Posts: 2459 Location: The Great Plains of South Dakota
|
Posted: Thu May 04, 2006 9:26 am Post subject: Re: questions |
|
|
| jwine8 wrote: |
| can someone answer some questions i have about this site ? |
Sure...just check out the forum titles and put them in the correct forum...someone will come along with the answer or refer you to tech support depending on the question. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
KGBlovesOreos Moderator
Joined: 28 Jun 2005 Posts: 5318 Location: VA
|
Posted: Thu May 04, 2006 9:35 am Post subject: Re: ... |
|
|
| deadmoney314 wrote: |
| Like KS said, aggression factor should go up and one needs to play a wider range of cards (loosen up). There is, of course, a slippery slope to fall down in not finding a good mix for your set of opponents. My theory with 6max is that I get faced with more decisions per hour than I would with 9max and that is a good thing if I am better than half the table. If you are making better decisions than your opponents on a more rapid pace you should in theory make money faster. My PT stats reflected this so I stayed at 6max. PT has been an invaluable tool to see what hands are profitable in each position but experience more than anything is the biggest factor because you will have to constantly adjust to the different opponents available. |
i know this has nothing to do with this thread, but this question really doesnt require a whole new thread... deadmoney, how have you been doing ever since that initial deposit a week ago? was it 50 or 100 that you originally started with? i'm just kind of curious because your posts are great, and i'm interested in seeing what you can do with that small amount... |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
deadmoney314 Message Board Junkie
Joined: 16 Jul 2005 Posts: 3228 Location: grunching through reply posts
|
Posted: Thu May 04, 2006 10:21 am Post subject: ... |
|
|
| thanks for the compliment KGB, I always look forward to your morning run of posts--kinda like coffee. I did ok at the microlimits picking up $26 at .25/.50 in 5 sessions most of which was two table. Add that to the ~$180 I got for 2nd place in the bounty tourney + poster I was subsequently able to order... my deposit on FTP was well worth the time. Lastly, it was -a lot- of fun to play here and everyone was respectful even at the micros. I highly recommend everyone joining in on the fun the next time they offer something as nice as the bounty tourney. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Guest
|
Posted: Thu May 04, 2006 9:23 pm Post subject: Sklansky's Theory on Playing Shorthanded |
|
|
When playing short-handed (6 players of fewer), Sklansky's advice recommends pretending as if you're in middle position in a 9 player game. With that adjustment, your range of playable hands increases quite a bit under the gun. Fewer opponents equals less likelihood of premium hands being played.
If you're UTG in a short-handed game, imagine you're in a nine-player game and the first three players have folded, and now the action's on you.
I hope this helps.
-Eric Hammond- |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|