| Should Full Tilt create Micro Tables? |
| Yes |
|
58% |
[ 14 ] |
| No |
|
41% |
[ 10 ] |
|
| Total Votes : 24 |
|
| Author |
Message |
donjuan270 High Card
Joined: 08 Oct 2008 Posts: 2
|
Posted: Wed Oct 08, 2008 1:54 am Post subject: Micro Tables |
|
|
| I think Full Tilt should make micro tables, its nearly impossible to play poker when a player is under the $2 minimum to play in any game, tables such as 0$.01-$0.02 blinds would be really nice to see in the future |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
tracysanders Message Board Junkie
Joined: 02 Apr 2008 Posts: 1270
|
Posted: Wed Oct 08, 2008 2:17 am Post subject: |
|
|
| +1 |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Flying_Kiwi Message Board Junkie
Joined: 03 Sep 2006 Posts: 6527 Location: somewhere spacific
|
Posted: Wed Oct 08, 2008 2:24 am Post subject: |
|
|
-1
= 0
It's like a poll.
 |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
tracysanders Message Board Junkie
Joined: 02 Apr 2008 Posts: 1270
|
Posted: Wed Oct 08, 2008 2:32 am Post subject: |
|
|
my bad, you're no fun kiwi  |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
BOYNAMEDSUE Moderator
Joined: 27 Jun 2005 Posts: 7910 Location: Isle of Tilt
|
Posted: Wed Oct 08, 2008 9:08 am Post subject: |
|
|
+2 |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Jim Cushman Full House
Joined: 15 Dec 2007 Posts: 205
|
Posted: Wed Oct 08, 2008 10:10 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| +3 .... They really need something smaller than .05/.10 |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Riddim Moderator
Joined: 04 Dec 2005 Posts: 8151 Location: Sweden
|
Posted: Thu Oct 09, 2008 11:37 am Post subject: |
|
|
| They already have micro tables. That's what 10NL-50NL is. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Loopholes202 Message Board Junkie
Joined: 21 Jan 2008 Posts: 2149 Location: Washington
|
Posted: Thu Oct 09, 2008 3:19 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Riddim wrote: |
| They already have micro tables. That's what 10NL-50NL is. |
QFT
-1 |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
mgodd Message Board Junkie
Joined: 31 Dec 2007 Posts: 1211 Location: North Carolina
|
Posted: Fri Oct 10, 2008 7:40 am Post subject: |
|
|
+4
I would have loved these when I was building from a tiny bankroll. Not everyone can deposit $250-300 to be properly rolled for the "micros". |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Riddim Moderator
Joined: 04 Dec 2005 Posts: 8151 Location: Sweden
|
Posted: Fri Oct 10, 2008 8:04 am Post subject: |
|
|
| Yeah, I agree that nano-limits are nice for someone with a tiny roll. When I started I had to build my $25 deposit playing .05/.10 limit because the smallest no limit games the site I started on had was 10NL. I was just being a little nitpicky and pointing out that FT already has micro games and what OP is looking for is something even lower. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
tito_lays Two Pair
Joined: 13 Jan 2008 Posts: 64
|
Posted: Fri Oct 10, 2008 9:45 am Post subject: |
|
|
I played Absolute Poker and I would have to say the .01/.02 cent tables were the funniest tables to play on. And they were good to use for venting after losing out of tournaments on bad beats. But in my opinion, that's all they were good for.
Certainly if everyone played nano-limit poker the same way as they played low-limit, med-limit poker, then you could intelligently build a bank roll off of it. But people play nano-limit poker like they do play money poker. They just don't care, so if you make a 3x-5x bb raise with AKos, and over half the table calls you every time...how can you intelligently play that? Even if you do hit an A or a K with hi-pair, you have a good chance of getting sucked out or beat with a crap hand hitting 2 pair, trips, and multiple hands getting straight / flush draws.
It's "lottery ticket" poker. In my opinion, if you want to intelligently build a bankroll, I wouldn't be doing it anything less than $.25/$.50 poker...and even that's a stretch sometimes. Anything less can just be spent at the gas station, and once you get that lucky lottery ticket, deposit that and play low-limit, med-limit.
Let me just say that I would support nano-limit tables anyway, just because like I said, they're funny and worth a laugh...or good use to vent on without blowing a lot of your roll. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
vectorspace Three of a Kind
Joined: 17 Dec 2007 Posts: 99 Location: Texas
|
Posted: Sat Oct 11, 2008 3:42 pm Post subject: |
|
|
-1 to OP
$.05/$.10 is plenty low enough. If you can't afford to play these stakes, then you shouldn't be playing poker for real money. Stick to the play money tables.
The lowest game you will find at most casinos is $1/$2 NLHE. Full Tilt is offering a game at 5% of these stakes. That's a bargain for the cheaper players if I've ever seen one. Not to mention $2.25 tourneys. Everyone should be rolled to play these if they're playing for real money. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
d41603ph High Card
Joined: 28 May 2007 Posts: 3
|
Posted: Sat Oct 11, 2008 7:17 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| I think youre all full of ****. They ought to call this site bad beats are us. To many stupid plyers here that make stupid calls wqith trsh and think their good when they hit miracle card on river to suck out. All poker site are geared for bad beats to suck out as much money asd they can. Ithink the players that sponsor these sites are lower than life for putting their names to support a site like this. How many bad beats in a row constitutes rigged . |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
d41603ph High Card
Joined: 28 May 2007 Posts: 3
|
Posted: Sat Oct 11, 2008 7:19 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| When the same seat hits hand after hand after hand after hand with anything they play thats not random thats ridiculous. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
cmbf117 Straight Flush
Joined: 19 May 2008 Posts: 371
|
Posted: Sun Oct 12, 2008 1:35 am Post subject: |
|
|
| d41603ph wrote: |
| I think youre all full of ****. They ought to call this site bad beats are us. To many stupid plyers here that make stupid calls wqith trsh and think their good when they hit miracle card on river to suck out. All poker site are geared for bad beats to suck out as much money asd they can. Ithink the players that sponsor these sites are lower than life for putting their names to support a site like this. How many bad beats in a row constitutes rigged . |
 |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|