Online Poker Room
Our Poker Players
Texas Hold Em Download
How To Play Poker
Full Tilt Poker
Real Money Poker Games
News & Promotions
Poker Store
Online Poker Affiliates
Full Tilt Poker
Online Poker Forum at Full Tilt Poker
  FAQFAQ   SearchSearch    RegisterRegister   ProfileProfile  Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages  Log inLog in 

Online Poker Forum - Pokerstars Tripledraw not realistic?

 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Online Poker Forum Home -> General Discussion
Author Message
bizarroquinn
Message Board Junkie


Joined: 02 Oct 2006
Posts: 1516

PostPosted: Sat Oct 11, 2008 6:54 am    Post subject: Pokerstars Tripledraw not realistic? Reply with quote


To me this is a big blow to PS. It's the only site I play triple draw on and now I'm thinking of quitting. What do you guys think?


http://forumserver.twoplustwo.com/28/internet-gambling/stars-changing-odds-triple-draw-games-303618/

According to this thread, with confirmation from PokerStars representative Alex Scott, PokerStars has altered their deal in triple draw.

In non-community card games, it’s frequently possible to run out of cards. For instance, if you play an 8-handed stud game, if every player were to see the river it would require 56 cards (plus burn cards). In a 6-handed triple draw game, theoretically speaking each player could consume up to 20 cards each (drawing five cards on each of the three draws), requiring potentially up to 120 cards total (plus burn cards).

Now obviously we’re never likely to see a legitimate hand of triple draw that consumes anywhere near 120 cards. But occasionally more than 52 cards are consumed. In that case, the accepted protocol is to reshuffle the muck and use the discards to complete all the draws.

PokerStars has chosen to alter this protocol slightly. They reshuffle the muck as you would in a brick and mortar game, but they deal out the cards such that no one will receive a card that they have previously discarded. Presumably, before they deal a card to you, they check to make sure you haven’t gotten it already… and if you have, then they deal you the next card.

Quoting Alex Scott:

I can confirm that this is correct. It is not possible to draw a card which you have already discarded at PokerStars, even in Triple Draw.

and

It’s not an error - the decision was made after much discussion and consultation with Team PokerStars (in fact, the original suggestion came from one of the most respected pros on the team). The theory is that no player would want one of their previous discards back, but there is no way to achieve that in a live game. Online, it’s easy, so why not do it?

I have to say, I think this is really quite a bad decision on PokerStars’s part. Here’s why:

1. Online poker is designed as an explicit analog to brick and mortar poker. In other words, by explicitly mimicking the look of a live game (using the same deck, same table look, same deal, same betting structures and rules, even going so far sometimes as to recreate fake dealer boxes), online poker sites are also making implied assurances that the game will behave like a live game as well. In other words, that the cards will be dealt in a random manner and that each card is equally likely.
2. In a live game you could (and would) never deal the cards according to the rules PokerStars now uses for triple draw.
3. Therefore, this rule change betrays the implied assurance that PokerStars accurately simulates live play.

http://www.notedpokerauthority.com/articles/manipulating-the-deck-in-online-poker.html is where this commentary is from.
Back to top
Peepers_au
Royal Flush


Joined: 15 Feb 2008
Posts: 622
Location: Melbourne, Australia

PostPosted: Sat Oct 11, 2008 7:06 am    Post subject: Re: Pokerstars Tripledraw not realistic? Reply with quote

bizarroquinn wrote:
In non-community card games, it’s frequently possible to run out of cards. For instance, if you play an 8-handed stud game, if every player were to see the river it would require 56 cards (plus burn cards). In a 6-handed triple draw game, theoretically speaking each player could consume up to 20 cards each (drawing five cards on each of the three draws), requiring potentially up to 120 cards total (plus burn cards).


Why are burn cards being discussed in the context of online hands?

There's no reason to employ burn cards, as their is no physical "deck" to mark.
Back to top
bizarroquinn
Message Board Junkie


Joined: 02 Oct 2006
Posts: 1516

PostPosted: Sat Oct 11, 2008 7:17 am    Post subject: Re: Pokerstars Tripledraw not realistic? Reply with quote

Peepers_au wrote:
bizarroquinn wrote:
In non-community card games, it’s frequently possible to run out of cards. For instance, if you play an 8-handed stud game, if every player were to see the river it would require 56 cards (plus burn cards). In a 6-handed triple draw game, theoretically speaking each player could consume up to 20 cards each (drawing five cards on each of the three draws), requiring potentially up to 120 cards total (plus burn cards).


Why are burn cards being discussed in the context of online hands?

There's no reason to employ burn cards, as their is no physical "deck" to mark.


I believe this was brought up to show how the game works in real life, and since many poker sites try to emulate poker 100% it's worth nothing how the game works in real life.
Back to top
Tiera Starr
Message Board Junkie


Joined: 01 Mar 2006
Posts: 1933

PostPosted: Sat Oct 11, 2008 7:32 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

I also disagree with this practice. For example, I may discard an 8 or 9 in my first discard round, however, I may be happy to receive that card back on the third draw.
Back to top
mgodd
Message Board Junkie


Joined: 31 Dec 2007
Posts: 1211
Location: North Carolina

PostPosted: Sat Oct 11, 2008 9:03 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

I don't know anything about tripledraw, but this seems pretty stupid. I'm pretty sure with any type of poker game, the cards are supposed to be RANDOM?
Back to top
Xorc1st
Four of a Kind


Joined: 12 Mar 2007
Posts: 331

PostPosted: Mon Oct 13, 2008 3:16 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

I dont like this either.
Back to top
UFO1947
Alien Interrogator


Joined: 08 Jun 2006
Posts: 3306
Location: NS, Canada

PostPosted: Mon Oct 13, 2008 3:53 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

gross, too bad we can't get the pros name. would love to email him or her.
Back to top
BOYNAMEDSUE
Moderator


Joined: 27 Jun 2005
Posts: 7910
Location: Isle of Tilt

PostPosted: Mon Oct 13, 2008 5:41 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

I think the cards should be dealt like they would be in a live game, but I don't mind the way they are doing it right now. The respected pro does make a good point. Online card games can do things live games can't, so why not.

I don't see it as anything to worry about.
Back to top
HuJwang
Forum Blight


Joined: 20 Aug 2006
Posts: 6431
Location: Halifax, NS

PostPosted: Mon Oct 13, 2008 6:29 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

I think the way it works now is fine but they need to make sure people know about it.
Back to top
Igor30
High Card


Joined: 12 Aug 2008
Posts: 8
Location: Serbia

PostPosted: Tue Oct 14, 2008 11:02 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

I did play 2-7 lowball Tripledraw on PS two days ago,and all I can say for this: biggest **** of all time!That's rarely stupid game!
Back to top
YDWard
Three of a Kind


Joined: 21 Dec 2007
Posts: 83

PostPosted: Tue Oct 14, 2008 2:54 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

And I just love how all the apologists for these scams claim the online deals are random.

These sites alter the deals for other reasons, too. Don't doubt it for a single moment.
Back to top
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Online Poker Forum Home -> General Discussion All times are GMT - 5 Hours
Page 1 of 1

 


Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group