Online Poker Forum at Full Tilt Poker

AllInDrawinDead · Posted: Mon Mar 06, 2006 9:13 pm Post subject:

I probably would have moved it in on the flop. I would have checked to Doyle, let him make his continuation bet, and then move in for whatever I had left. Doyle is the type of player to raise with anything preflop and lead out whether or not it hit him. Besides, even if he does have you beat you have plenty of outs. I know Doyle would likely move in here so why not give him some of his own medicine.

Daemon70 · Pair Joined: 22 Mar 2006 Posts: 24

I also voted to call. There is a big chance doyle is on like AQ and is trying to get you to think he has a straight with that small bet.

jimmyvengeance · Royal Flush Joined: 10 Sep 2005 Posts: 506

I, too, would call.

His river bet either means:

1)I just hit a straight and I'm trying to make a bet that you can call or bluff re-raise, or:

2)I have absolutely nothing and I'm hoping you have absolutely nothing.

A player like Doyle Brunson and I'd say it's a 50-50 shot between #1 and option #2.

First off, I wouldn't fold, because scenario #2 is just too likely. So I can find out by calling or raising. If it's #1, I lose the pot no matter what, plus whatever else I bet into it. If it's #2, I win the pot (he'll fold to any raises that I make). So I call -- there's nothing to be gained by raising here.

slickrick0786 · Full House Joined: 08 Jan 2006 Posts: 160

you have to raise on the flopflop..i believe it was jaconda who said something about open end straight draw and a pair against most likely ace king or something along those lines, you have to raise doyle back and make him pay to draw out or see where you stand in the hand.

and yes the odds are to high for you to fold. if he has you beat he has you beat..with those odds though you have to pay him off if he has you

	Full Tilt Poker is licensed by the Kahnawake Gaming Commission. © Copyright 2004 - 2005 FullTiltPoker.com., All Rights Reserved