Online Poker Room
Our Poker Players
Texas Hold Em Download
How To Play Poker
Full Tilt Poker
Real Money Poker Games
News & Promotions
Poker Store
Online Poker Affiliates
Full Tilt Poker
Online Poker Forum at Full Tilt Poker
  FAQFAQ   SearchSearch    RegisterRegister   ProfileProfile  Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages  Log inLog in 

Online Poker Forum - 2+ years of pure nonsense

 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Online Poker Forum Home -> Poker News
Author Message
mathman1115
Wizard of Odderation


Joined: 01 Sep 2005
Posts: 3085
Location: Land of the Fightin' Phillies

PostPosted: Wed Aug 13, 2008 10:22 pm    Post subject: 2+ years of pure nonsense Reply with quote

I know there are several threads in multiple sections touching on what i'm about to say, but i wanted to start a new one so we can go back to a general discussion. Here are my thoughts:

The bottom line with everything that has gone on with online poker in the last 2 years or whatever (since neteller shut down) is that everyone needs their cut. The IRS, the government, politicians, you name it.

When the right people make sure that everyone is getting a piece of the pie, it all goes away. After all, everything in this world is about one thing, right?

What is the reason for all of this nonsense anyway? What, we need to prevent underage kids from stealing credit cards and gambling away their parents money? Are we trying to help those with gambling addictions keep from going bankrupt and/or destroying their family? Gimme a **** break.

Maybe we should prohibit alchohol again so 15 year olds can't break into their parents liquor cabinet when they're not home. Or maybe cigarettes should be banned from the US because a 70 year old man with emphyzema can't find a way to quit. Hell, let's close every Dairy Queen in the country because overly obese people can't control their food intake.
The fact is, alchohol, cigarettes, and even Dairy Queen will never go away because they all make money, despite those consequences. And even more importantly, that money goes to the right people. When money generated from online poker goes to the right people, no one will have a problem.

If i'm wrong, then you can forget about the land of the free, because its all bull ****.
Back to top
Lrgetrout
High Card


Joined: 13 Aug 2008
Posts: 11

PostPosted: Wed Aug 13, 2008 10:35 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

What about marijuana? Like poker, they could regulate and tax it, but try to also get rid of that.

Some things, people will never accept, no matter what.
Back to top
cubbies760
Drawing Dead


Joined: 19 Oct 2006
Posts: 7547
Location: Suburban Chicago

PostPosted: Wed Aug 13, 2008 10:40 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

It's simply about the U.S. Government wanting to get their piece of the pie....the billion dollar online gaming pie.

They don't give a shjt about people or kids gambling their money away, or the peoples' welfare...they want their money.
Back to top
missjugsalot
Message Board Junkie


Joined: 31 Oct 2006
Posts: 1318
Location: Land of the free, because of the brave

PostPosted: Wed Aug 13, 2008 11:00 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

cubbies760 wrote:
It's simply about the U.S. Government wanting to get their piece of the pie....the billion dollar online gaming pie.

They don't give a shjt about people or kids gambling their money away, or the peoples' welfare...they want their money.


sad but true...
Back to top
Lrgetrout
High Card


Joined: 13 Aug 2008
Posts: 11

PostPosted: Wed Aug 13, 2008 11:01 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

cubbies760 wrote:
It's simply about the U.S. Government wanting to get their piece of the pie....the billion dollar online gaming pie.

They don't give a shjt about people or kids gambling their money away, or the peoples' welfare...they want their money.


If it was just about getting their share, they would have set up a system to tax and regulate online gaming long ago.

No, it's a puritanical belief that people need to be kept away from "evil vices." Nothing more.
Back to top
cubbies760
Drawing Dead


Joined: 19 Oct 2006
Posts: 7547
Location: Suburban Chicago

PostPosted: Wed Aug 13, 2008 11:05 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Lrgetrout wrote:
cubbies760 wrote:
It's simply about the U.S. Government wanting to get their piece of the pie....the billion dollar online gaming pie.

They don't give a shjt about people or kids gambling their money away, or the peoples' welfare...they want their money.


If it was just about getting their share, they would have set up a system to tax and regulate online gaming long ago.

No, it's a puritanical belief that people need to be kept away from "evil vices." Nothing more.


Don't you think that's in the works?

Why are there casino towns and riverboat gambling if they are concerned about keeping us from the evil vices?

If the evil vices were of utmost importance, there wouldn't be any forms of gambling, no alcohol or tobacco.

It's about money and regulation to assure that they get their money, nothing more.

BTW, online poker has only been going strong for a few years. Before that, there wasn't enough revenue in it for the gov't to worry about getting involved. It's been huge as of about 2005, and we all know that it takes several years for the ball to get rolling.
Back to top
Lrgetrout
High Card


Joined: 13 Aug 2008
Posts: 11

PostPosted: Wed Aug 13, 2008 11:19 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

cubbies760 wrote:
Don't you think that's in the works?

Why are there casino towns and riverboat gambling if they are concerned about keeping us from the evil vices?


Because those are in control of the states, not the federal government. The farther away you get from a person, the less government actually cares.

Note that California is currently in the process of attempting to start intrastate online poker. Again, states can do what the federal government chooses not to do, because they are closer to the people they govern.

Quote:
If the evil vices were of utmost importance, there wouldn't be any forms of gambling, no alcohol or tobacco.


Already been tried with alcohol. Remember Prohibition?

Quote:
It's about money and regulation to assure that they get their money, nothing more.


If it were just about the money, we wouldn't have had the UIGEA. We would have had a cessation of actions against sites, and a full set of regulations developed. (And then, and only then, would they have moved against any sites that refused this regulation.)
Back to top
titanswun
Four of a Kind


Joined: 25 Jun 2008
Posts: 259
Location: Lewisburg, Tn

PostPosted: Wed Aug 13, 2008 11:35 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

I agree that if the "Right People" got their cut it would all go away. So Full Tilt needs to give them their piece of the pie so you can pay us ours.
Back to top
st6truckie
Message Board Junkie


Joined: 28 Dec 2007
Posts: 2018

PostPosted: Thu Aug 14, 2008 6:48 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

cubbies760 wrote:
It's simply about the U.S. Government wanting to get their piece of the pie....the billion dollar online gaming pie.

They don't give a shjt about people or kids gambling their money away, or the peoples' welfare...they want their money.


Sorry to say but this is the major problem. They see the amount of money available that they cant get there hands on.
Back to top
bluestone10
Message Board Junkie


Joined: 01 Dec 2006
Posts: 1323
Location: The Southern (and a little western) USA

PostPosted: Wed Aug 20, 2008 8:36 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Lrgetrout wrote:
cubbies760 wrote:
It's simply about the U.S. Government wanting to get their piece of the pie....the billion dollar online gaming pie.

They don't give a shjt about people or kids gambling their money away, or the peoples' welfare...they want their money.


If it was just about getting their share, they would have set up a system to tax and regulate online gaming long ago.

No, it's a puritanical belief that people need to be kept away from "evil vices." Nothing more.


not true, they can't regulate offshore gaming sites. so there is no way for them to get action from it. it is all about taxing it
Back to top
sig1561
Straight


Joined: 12 Mar 2007
Posts: 116

PostPosted: Wed Aug 20, 2008 6:28 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

+1marijuana

?

Siggy
Back to top
fletch_smf
Royal Flush


Joined: 06 Jun 2008
Posts: 804
Location: Brisneyland

PostPosted: Wed Aug 20, 2008 10:28 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

sig1561 wrote:
+1marijuana

?

Siggy

That's about keeping their jobs. They believe (and it's probably true) that more voters want to keep marijuana illegal and what's popular keeps getting them re-elected.
Back to top
HighKey
Royal Flush


Joined: 03 Jul 2008
Posts: 611

PostPosted: Wed Aug 20, 2008 10:32 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

...even though every time it comes up for a vote the voters say they want at least medical marijuana legalized (with the possible exception of that one time in Washington DC, which we don't know for sure because Congress forbid them from counting the votes).
Back to top
lovebeefstew
Message Board Junkie


Joined: 19 Apr 2007
Posts: 1665
Location: Australia

PostPosted: Fri Aug 22, 2008 8:17 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

So why is this such a problem in the US but not in many other countries? Im in Australia and I have no dramas with anything?
Back to top
trekk
Pair


Joined: 11 Jun 2008
Posts: 50

PostPosted: Sat Aug 23, 2008 9:28 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Lrgetrout wrote:
What about marijuana? Like poker, they could regulate and tax it, but try to also get rid of that.

Some things, people will never accept, no matter what.


You obviously do not handle large amounts of marijuana. it is taxed. legally and illegally.
Back to top
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Online Poker Forum Home -> Poker News All times are GMT - 5 Hours
Page 1 of 1

 


Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group