Online Poker Room
Our Poker Players
Texas Hold Em Download
How To Play Poker
Full Tilt Poker
Real Money Poker Games
News & Promotions
Poker Store
Online Poker Affiliates
Full Tilt Poker
Online Poker Forum at Full Tilt Poker
  FAQFAQ   SearchSearch    RegisterRegister   ProfileProfile  Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages  Log inLog in 

Online Poker Forum - Building a bankroll at low limits
Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3 ... 9, 10, 11
 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Online Poker Forum Home -> General Discussion
Author Message
bingy1990
Royal Flush


Joined: 01 Nov 2007
Posts: 680
Location: PokerStars MTT's.

PostPosted: Sat Jun 28, 2008 6:36 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

I'm doing well at the low-stakes these past few days, bumped up my bankroll about 20% using the Ferguson method. Theres alot of weak players down there and many calling stations, if you keep your head and don't tilt turning $50 into $100 safely is very easy.
Back to top
tjb111
Royal Flush


Joined: 26 Jun 2008
Posts: 885

PostPosted: Sat Jun 28, 2008 10:11 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

ok.. i posted here earlier..and decided not to wait for replies.. just go right into it after giving my mate the rest of my cash

private freeroll = 25$

played.10/.25 and 2$ SNG to build it up to 58.45$ so far (want to get it to 70$ by end of day)

the reason why i played .10/.25 is that at the 9 person table...people play INCREDIBLY TIGHT, and if you play INCREDIBLY TIGHT, you can work off a 2-4$ bluff per table easy enough.. and u may be lucky to have people call your premium hands (but in a tight table...not usually)

in a .05/.10 game... you probably WILL NOT get those bluffs in (less stakes, more loose) and the 2-4$ bluff turns into a .5/1$ bluff...which ISNT worth the money


(note..if u guys look me up and see how well ive been doing for this month...i had ALOT of debts to pay off from March..)

EDIT #1: hit 73$ thanks to my AJ (suited..flush draw.. pair Aces b4 u say anything) against A6 .... ty random noob who thought a A6 was a good all-in hand post flop

EDIT #2 80$ plus 1st in SNG now Smile

EDIT #3 lost a 20$ hand with 77 pre-flop against A10..flop hit A , but won a 26$ pot with JK against A7 postflop with J 2 2 on flop...noob bluffer. I GOT 86$ plus first in a SNG

EDIT #4 CRASHED...went to 45$ and gave 20 to mate to hold on to... 25 left .... .25/.50 hu

EDIT #5 BACK!!! after shaky entrances (actually went to 10 bucks and had to battle back) i got up to 78.30 plus the 20 my mate is holding on to!!
Back to top
CRISALIS
High Card


Joined: 08 Jun 2008
Posts: 6

PostPosted: Thu Jul 24, 2008 11:08 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

HuJwang wrote:
yes, you can build up a roll, but it requires a lot of patience. you will take a lot of bad beats, and lose to a lot of ridiculous hands. however, you will also win against a lot of ridiculous hands.

i started with an $85 deposit on FTP. i played .05/.10, didn't really know what i was doing, and went down to about $50 on my first day. so i decided to move to pokerstars to play their super-low limit games (.01/.02). after a month or so of playing the ultra-micros, i was up to around $200, and felt confident enough to return to FTP. i played $5 sng's and .25/.50 limit games, and eventually moved up to playing $10 sng's and .10/.25 no limit (with the occaisional .50/1 limit). so after a total of about 6 months, i'm sitting on a roll of $630. it's not a huge roll but i'm proud of it. i'm thinking i'm going to start taking shots at the $20 sng's and $1/$2 limit games soon, and maybe .25/.50 cap no limit.

so yeah. playing a variety of games definitely helps, since you can figure out which game best suits you. personally i prefer single-table no limit SNG's, because i haven't go the patience for large tourneys and i don't seem to fare all that well in ring games. you can also figure out if you prefer no limit or limit, holdem or omaha, or any other game.

also, read books. egotistic players think they're good enough to learn the game on their own, but they are almost always wrong. it's important to know a lot of the theory behind playing poker if you want to be a consistent winner.


A great idea, but if like me you lose all-ins when you're at least 4/1 fav, how the hell do you win. My theory is ok but continual bad beats make nonesense of all the theories etc.
For your idea to work then statistics have to work which on this site they don't. Also playing the same way on PKR I do quite well ( the poker odds work there ).
Back to top
fun101rockets
High Card


Joined: 20 Aug 2008
Posts: 6

PostPosted: Wed Aug 20, 2008 4:01 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

I got 50 dollars from pokerstrategy.com and played LAG.
The $50 quickly became $6
I 9 tabled the $2.25 sit and gos and my ROI is 10%.
I also played cash games (NL10) always buying in for the maximum
I learned how to play better poker and have made this $6 into over $320
Back to top
tehchipdonk
Two Pair


Joined: 01 Jul 2008
Posts: 71

PostPosted: Thu Sep 11, 2008 4:07 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

i flipped the free $50 from pokerstragegy to $1k, of course those aren't all from poker profits, most of it comes from rakeback since i grind 13 tables at nl25 sometime nl50
Back to top
lam8chop
High Card


Joined: 01 Dec 2007
Posts: 8

PostPosted: Fri Sep 19, 2008 6:36 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Try playing a different site to this one, that would be a start. They give rakeback to some and not others, they give you good starting hands then pay off the underdog to get more rake , where do you think all the sponsorship money comes from? full tilt ? this site puts me on full tilt!!!
Back to top
TheGnomeBank
Straight


Joined: 30 Sep 2008
Posts: 104

PostPosted: Wed Oct 08, 2008 8:15 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

It's interesting how 90% of these posts are from the supposed winners and so very few from the millions of losers out there. Makes it sound great and appealing for all the novices out there.

Here's how I see it. Building a bankroll at low stakes appears to be almost impossible. Poker "works" generally because everyone is expected to behave in a certain way. You're expected to understand the basic strategy and the concept of pot odds and, everything being equal, you should be able to play tight and see your bankroll slowly and gently grow over time. Unfortunately things just aren't equal. Poker science, strategy and all the books, lessons and training material rely on 2 key facts. 1. That the cards are truly random so odds and percentages really reflect reality, and 2. That people generally conform largely to the same set of behaviours (give or take a few acceptable stone cold bluffs etc).

I have learned to play tight, wait for premium hands and try to make the most of them when they do come. I have seen my bank roll grow slowly and steadily using this strategy. However, it is SLOW and STEADY. There are no big fast wins to be had long term.

Now if this were all that was involved I'd be happily making that slow steady profit along with my rakeback. Sadly it isn't.

FT is riddled with stupid set up hands that get thrown in periodically about every 30 hands or so. These hands deliver NUT winning hands to players either once the flop has been reveled or after the turn. With your steady strategy you obviously bet these hands out hoping to catch poor players following less than premium hands. Those players call and FT inevitably then delivers their 1-8 outs hand on the river taking a MASSIVE chunk out of the bankroll you'd been steadily building for the past 100 hands. You simply CAN NOT lay down these hands which are NUTS before the river. I'm not talking about crappy top 2 pairs here I'm taking NUT Flushes or top straights that by the turn card are unbeatable. FT kills you every time by delivering miracles to the underdog.
It generates increased rake of course by building bigger pots but it totally screws the game of poker and it totally screws all of the accepted strategies, teachings, and basic concepts. The cards have to be truly random for all that to work and the minute the cards are not, everything goes out the window.

I am totally sick of playing tight and steady and having all my profits busted by these stupid FT set up hands. It absolutely ruins the game.
Someone else said "this isn't poker, it's a game of luck presented in a poker format". He was absolutely right.

For those itching to respond with theories that these are just bad beats or that my poker just sucks, save it. I do get my share of miracle rivers every now and then but I don't get them when there is another NUT hand involved and thus I don't earn a great pot when I get the miracle, but I lose big time when the set hand delivers me the NUTS before the river.
True cards would average out and I'd be able to take the ups with the downs. That doesn't happen.

At this stage I have to conclude that winning online poker should be very possible but it relies totally on fair cards and no stupid set hand dealing to generate rake.
Back to top
lovebeefstew
Message Board Junkie


Joined: 19 Apr 2007
Posts: 1658
Location: Australia

PostPosted: Sun Oct 12, 2008 4:04 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

TheGnomeBank wrote:
It's interesting how 90% of these posts are from the supposed winners and so very few from the millions of losers out there. Makes it sound great and appealing for all the novices out there.

Here's how I see it. Building a bankroll at low stakes appears to be almost impossible. Poker "works" generally because everyone is expected to behave in a certain way. You're expected to understand the basic strategy and the concept of pot odds and, everything being equal, you should be able to play tight and see your bankroll slowly and gently grow over time. Unfortunately things just aren't equal. Poker science, strategy and all the books, lessons and training material rely on 2 key facts. 1. That the cards are truly random so odds and percentages really reflect reality, and 2. That people generally conform largely to the same set of behaviours (give or take a few acceptable stone cold bluffs etc).

I have learned to play tight, wait for premium hands and try to make the most of them when they do come. I have seen my bank roll grow slowly and steadily using this strategy. However, it is SLOW and STEADY. There are no big fast wins to be had long term.

Now if this were all that was involved I'd be happily making that slow steady profit along with my rakeback. Sadly it isn't.

FT is riddled with stupid set up hands that get thrown in periodically about every 30 hands or so. These hands deliver NUT winning hands to players either once the flop has been reveled or after the turn. With your steady strategy you obviously bet these hands out hoping to catch poor players following less than premium hands. Those players call and FT inevitably then delivers their 1-8 outs hand on the river taking a MASSIVE chunk out of the bankroll you'd been steadily building for the past 100 hands. You simply CAN NOT lay down these hands which are NUTS before the river. I'm not talking about crappy top 2 pairs here I'm taking NUT Flushes or top straights that by the turn card are unbeatable. FT kills you every time by delivering miracles to the underdog.
It generates increased rake of course by building bigger pots but it totally screws the game of poker and it totally screws all of the accepted strategies, teachings, and basic concepts. The cards have to be truly random for all that to work and the minute the cards are not, everything goes out the window.

I am totally sick of playing tight and steady and having all my profits busted by these stupid FT set up hands. It absolutely ruins the game.
Someone else said "this isn't poker, it's a game of luck presented in a poker format". He was absolutely right.

For those itching to respond with theories that these are just bad beats or that my poker just sucks, save it. I do get my share of miracle rivers every now and then but I don't get them when there is another NUT hand involved and thus I don't earn a great pot when I get the miracle, but I lose big time when the set hand delivers me the NUTS before the river.
True cards would average out and I'd be able to take the ups with the downs. That doesn't happen.

At this stage I have to conclude that winning online poker should be very possible but it relies totally on fair cards and no stupid set hand dealing to generate rake.


Dont you just feel like a complete idiot when you write this garbage. If you dont realise how ridiculous you are you really need to seek help. What a rubbish, worthless waste of time posting such crap. For all new comers, ignore this please. It is NOT rigged and we all get beats ok. You arent the only one.
Back to top
fletch_smf
Royal Flush


Joined: 06 Jun 2008
Posts: 779
Location: Brisneyland

PostPosted: Sun Oct 12, 2008 7:33 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

TheGnomeBank wrote:
It's interesting how 90% of these posts are from the supposed winners and so very few from the millions of losers out there. Makes it sound great and appealing for all the novices out there.

Here's how I see it. Building a bankroll at low stakes appears to be almost impossible.

1. Why would we want advice about building a bank roll from a losing player?

2. This is my earnings since June 21st this year, shortly after discovering the strategy forum here and basically turning my game around. Playing exclusively cash games $5NL till about 15k hands where I switched to $10NL. You'll notice the swings are a lot bigger from that point on (twice as big you might say) but not more than my bank roll can handle.

If I can do it, anyone can.
Back to top
eastwoodo4
Pair


Joined: 04 Jun 2008
Posts: 22

PostPosted: Wed Nov 26, 2008 5:28 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

if u cant do it on the play tables u cant do it on the real money tables.i say go try and get 500000 play chips so u can play the 500000 play tourny.it pays real cash.the play tables r the same program as the real money tables.
Back to top
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Online Poker Forum Home -> General Discussion All times are GMT - 5 Hours
Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3 ... 9, 10, 11
Page 11 of 11

 


Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group