Online Poker Room
Our Poker Players
Texas Hold Em Download
How To Play Poker
Full Tilt Poker
Real Money Poker Games
News & Promotions
Poker Store
Online Poker Affiliates
Full Tilt Poker
Online Poker Forum at Full Tilt Poker
  FAQFAQ   SearchSearch    RegisterRegister   ProfileProfile  Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages  Log inLog in 

Online Poker Forum - Even though I lost, I just had to laugh
Goto page Previous  1, 2
 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Online Poker Forum Home -> Sit & Go Tournament Poker
Author Message
ThePhoenix78
Royal Flush


Joined: 19 Jan 2007
Posts: 886
Location: On a big pile of money with many beautiful women

PostPosted: Tue Jul 22, 2008 11:05 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

I also didn't think the villain played the hand THAT badly. I probably raise preflop in his spot, but early on a SnG, it's more important to preserve chips, and if he reasons that's a $2 game and only the third hand and thus can't easily predict how many calls he'll get, a check isn't unreasonable.

Now, on that flop, he has to figure he's good, unless somebody has 66. The SB could have a 2, but unlikely any of the limpers has a 2 (though A2 would have to be kept in mind, and not just because I know that was your holding, but because A2, especially suited, is a hand some people will limp in with). So all in all, he should feel pretty good about his hand. But it's vulnerable to draws and to overcards, so he needs to bet out with so many in the pot. I think 90 is too small, but I wouldn't say it's horrible. It's enough that if he get raised, he can be pretty sure he needs to proceed with caution on later streets. I would have bet something like 120 myself. So yeah, I think his bet is too small, but not atrocious.

Once somebody calls, and then somebody raises, he has to worry somebody has a set or maybe even 66. But I personally think you made a mistake only raising 3x after a bet and call. You didn't really deny the odds to somebody drawing to a flush, once you factor in implied odds. From his perspective, he might have been worried about the action after his bet, but also reasoned "hey, this is a $2 SnG, people will overplay top pair or make bad plays with just draws or A high" and figured his hand was still good. He's not super sure, so he calls. He checks what shouldn't be a scare card on the turn, now probably hoping he can try to check it down. You bet out. Yes, now something like A2 should be running through his mind. Seems like a strong bet if you have a boat, you'd want to bet smaller to encourage somebody to draw to a flush. So A2 is really the only hand I'd worry about. Only 8 ways to deal that though. I guess at the $2 level, if I'm the villain, I might worry about other hands with a 2, because people are bad enough to limp with any two suited cards. Still though, even at this level, people aren't often limping with 2s in their hand. So as others have said, I am not necessarily putting you on a 2 and I would still think that your bet might be something like A6 or 76 or medium PP that haven't filled up.

Given that it's early in the SnG and you have shown strength, I think folding TT in his spot to your turn bet is not a bad play and it's the safe thing to do. I might fold myself. But I don't think the call is atrocious, given that from his perspective, people are maniacs at the $2 level and thus could be playing weaker hands than TT as strongly as you've played it.

Now he hits his miracle T on the river and the rest is academic.

I don't mind your limp with A2 preflop thaaaat much, but would still rather see a fold. And I think your flop raise was too weak. I'd say, overall, nobody played the hand atrociously, but moves on both sides could be questioned, so you really shouldn't be arrogant and laugh at how he played it. Take a look in the mirror.
Back to top
ThePhoenix78
Royal Flush


Joined: 19 Jan 2007
Posts: 886
Location: On a big pile of money with many beautiful women

PostPosted: Tue Jul 22, 2008 11:07 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Oh, and Harrington's advice largely applies to MTTs, though there is some overlap. Raising 4-5x with TT OOP after a few limpers is probably best in a deep-stacked MTT, and maybe even in the SnG, but as others have pointed out, checking TT in the villain's spot isn't absolutely horrible in light of the ICM considerations that have to be taken into account for SnGs.
Back to top
drewg22
Flush


Joined: 25 May 2008
Posts: 139

PostPosted: Tue Jul 22, 2008 12:24 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

ThePhoenix78 wrote:
I

I don't mind your limp with A2 preflop thaaaat much, but would still rather see a fold. And I think your flop raise was too weak. I'd say, overall, nobody played the hand atrociously, but moves on both sides could be questioned, so you really shouldn't be arrogant and laugh at how he played it. Take a look in the mirror.


As I said, I laughed at myself as well as him.

If I did not want feedback on my play, I would not have posted here.

I actually think my worst play, which no one commented on was calling his All in bet at the end. Not doing that, I still had about 550 chips left which is not awful only 3 hands into an SnG. I have come back from worse than that.
Back to top
skeeter1114
Message Board Junkie


Joined: 28 Feb 2007
Posts: 2496

PostPosted: Tue Jul 22, 2008 12:42 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

drewg22 wrote:


As I said, I laughed at myself as well as him.

If I did not want feedback on my play, I would not have posted here.

I actually think my worst play, which no one commented on was calling his All in bet at the end. Not doing that, I still had about 550 chips left which is not awful only 3 hands into an SnG. I have come back from worse than that.


Disagree. You have to call because I'm assuming you're not putting him on 66, 77, 10-10, or 2-6,7, or 10. I'm throwing out 8-9 because he's not betting the flop and calling a raise on the flop with 8-9. There are only 3 likely hands that he can have here that would beat you, 4 in total. You just got unlucky that he has one of those 3 hands. He easily could shove with AA, KK, QQ, or JJ, which you have beat. I'd call in your spot.
Back to top
Wayniac
Forum Pro


Joined: 26 Mar 2008
Posts: 617

PostPosted: Tue Jul 22, 2008 4:19 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

skeeter1114 wrote:
drewg22 wrote:


As I said, I laughed at myself as well as him.

If I did not want feedback on my play, I would not have posted here.

I actually think my worst play, which no one commented on was calling his All in bet at the end. Not doing that, I still had about 550 chips left which is not awful only 3 hands into an SnG. I have come back from worse than that.


Disagree. You have to call because I'm assuming you're not putting him on 66, 77, 10-10, or 2-6,7, or 10. I'm throwing out 8-9 because he's not betting the flop and calling a raise on the flop with 8-9. There are only 3 likely hands that he can have here that would beat you, 4 in total. You just got unlucky that he has one of those 3 hands. He easily could shove with AA, KK, QQ, or JJ, which you have beat. I'd call in your spot.

Agreed, you have to call at this point. There is already something like 2,500 in the pot now, and you need to put in an extra 500 or so to make the call. It is easy to say you played the end wrong because your money went in ahead the entire time, until the river. This, however, is incorrect thinking. He would have probably made this same move with AA, KK, QQ, JJ, and since there was no preflop raise, he'd do this with any 2 as well.
Back to top
GoldenDomer9
Message Board Junkie


Joined: 25 Apr 2006
Posts: 1961
Location: CAP tbls

PostPosted: Tue Jul 22, 2008 8:55 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

A2 play pre flop is worse imo.
Back to top
GoldenDomer9
Message Board Junkie


Joined: 25 Apr 2006
Posts: 1961
Location: CAP tbls

PostPosted: Tue Jul 22, 2008 9:01 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Wayniac wrote:
skeeter1114 wrote:
Wayniac, I'm going to disagree with you a bit on the A2 part.


I overlooked where in the tournament this was (I failed to realize it was so early)... and I also failed to recognize (I saw it... just didn't cross my mind) it was a $2 SNG.

So actually, I think I'm going to disagree with myself.

Great... I'm glad we had this talk.


I'm going to go even further and disagree with your own disagreement Shocked .....

Early is exactly when you should limp in (following other limpers), just not with A2. Early you can see a flop for cheap and take someone's stack; however, when blinds escalate, you should nearly always be raising or folding. I think the sentiment here is right (fold A2), but completely backwards in reasoning. Fold it both early and late.
Back to top
Wayniac
Forum Pro


Joined: 26 Mar 2008
Posts: 617

PostPosted: Tue Jul 22, 2008 10:51 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

GoldenDomer9 wrote:
Wayniac wrote:
skeeter1114 wrote:
Wayniac, I'm going to disagree with you a bit on the A2 part.


I overlooked where in the tournament this was (I failed to realize it was so early)... and I also failed to recognize (I saw it... just didn't cross my mind) it was a $2 SNG.

So actually, I think I'm going to disagree with myself.

Great... I'm glad we had this talk.


I'm going to go even further and disagree with your own disagreement Shocked .....

Early is exactly when you should limp in (following other limpers), just not with A2. Early you can see a flop for cheap and take someone's stack; however, when blinds escalate, you should nearly always be raising or folding. I think the sentiment here is right (fold A2), but completely backwards in reasoning. Fold it both early and late.

Then you don't disagree with me at all. I wasn't disagreeing with myself about limping in and stacking somebody. I was disagreeing with myself about limping in with the intention of outplaying them to the point of trying to make them fold and pick up a small pot.

Early on, limp and try to stack somebody if you want. Just don't jump in the pot with the intention of picking up a small pot if everybody checks it early on in a $2 SNG.
Back to top
boking17
Pair


Joined: 24 Jun 2008
Posts: 32

PostPosted: Wed Jul 23, 2008 3:38 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

This beat does have some sting to it. However, he did make some big calls. This would have been textbook for an unraised big blind with 2/6 or 2/7.

If you thought you were ahead and were trying to shut down the pot, then you didn't bet enough to convince yourself you were beat when you got a caller.

If you weren't trying to shut down the pot then you took a calculated risk to increase your winnings and it didn't pay off.
Back to top
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Online Poker Forum Home -> Sit & Go Tournament Poker All times are GMT - 5 Hours
Goto page Previous  1, 2
Page 2 of 2

 


Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group