|
| Author |
Message |
Lucky_Bub
Message Board Junkie
Joined: 11 Dec 2006
Posts: 1711
Location: Here, There and Everywhere
|
 Posted: Sun Jul 06, 2008 3:20 pm Post subject: Too aggressive? |
 |
|
Full Tilt Poker, NL Hold'em Tournament, 30/60 Blinds, 9 Players
-
UTG: 3,455
UTG+1: 1,105
UTG+2: 2,380
MP1: 3,235
MP2: 2,695
Hero (CO): 5,145
BTN: 7,150
SB: 5,915
BB: 4,770
Pre-Flop: (90) 4 4 dealt to Hero (CO)
5 folds, Hero raises to 180, BTN calls 180, SB folds, BB calls 120
Flop: (570) 9 3 A (3 Players)
BB checks, Hero bets 250, BTN calls 250, BB calls 250
Turn: (1,320) 7 (3 Players)
BB checks, Hero checks, BTN checks
River: (1,320) A (3 Players)
BB checks, Hero bets 540, BTN calls 540, BB folds
Results: 2,400 Pot
Hero showed 4 4 (two pair, Aces and Fours) and LOST (-970 NET)
BTN showed T 9 (two pair, Aces and Nines) and WON 2,400 (+1,430 NET) |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
mgodd
Message Board Junkie
Joined: 31 Dec 2007
Posts: 1210
Location: North Carolina
|
| Posted: Sun Jul 06, 2008 3:57 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| I'd bet at least 350-400 on the flop. After being called down by 2 people on the flop, I would just check-fold it on any further streets. If you really had an ace, you should be betting big on every street because of the flush draw, so your line here isn't very believable imo. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Lucky_Bub
Message Board Junkie
Joined: 11 Dec 2006
Posts: 1711
Location: Here, There and Everywhere
|
| Posted: Sun Jul 06, 2008 6:23 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| After I looked over the hand again, the call seemed more understandable. If I had the ace, my line would be absolutely horrid. I thought it was worth a shot since the draws missed, but I still see why check-folding in this spot is the better option. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group
|
|
FAQ
Search
Register
Profile
Log in to check your private messages
Log in
