| How many "bad players" do you want at your table @ no limit? |
| 1-3 bad players |
|
36% |
[ 9 ] |
| 4-6 bad players |
|
24% |
[ 6 ] |
| 6-9 bad players |
|
40% |
[ 10 ] |
|
| Total Votes : 25 |
|
| Author |
Message |
stacelin
High Card
Joined: 13 Jun 2008
Posts: 7
|
 Posted: Tue Jun 17, 2008 7:10 pm Post subject: Playing with "bad players" |
 |
|
How many "bad players" do you want at your table when playing poker?
I have found that I would only like 1-3 bad players when playing limit or else the game is a crap shoot. However, at no limit, I can handle many more bad players!
Let me know your thoughts.
Stacelin
[spam removal /Riddim] |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Riddim
Moderator
Joined: 04 Dec 2005
Posts: 8176
Location: Sweden
|
| Posted: Tue Jun 17, 2008 8:06 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| I want as many as there are opponents at my table, meaning 5 or less since I play 6max and HU. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
bdbranch
Banned
Joined: 13 Mar 2008
Posts: 503
Location: At home wdyt. Btw. I'm not opinionated all the time, umm can you be opinionated when you're asleep
|
| Posted: Tue Jun 17, 2008 8:21 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I want everyone to be a bad player. In fact, I'd like to select who I want to play against and if someone talented comes onto the table, I want to be able to kick them off.
Duh, what do you expect the answer to be? |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
DrAndrian
Straight Flush
Joined: 02 May 2008
Posts: 383
|
| Posted: Fri Jun 20, 2008 7:29 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| The more, the merrier. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
telebob
Full House
Joined: 17 Oct 2006
Posts: 239
Location: Lake Tahoe
|
| Posted: Fri Jun 20, 2008 7:33 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Do you mean including me, or besides me? |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
LostOstrich
Forum Ostrich
Joined: 11 Aug 2007
Posts: 4183
Location: In your bed, with your wife. Smoking your cigarettes, drinking your brandy.
|
| Posted: Fri Jun 20, 2008 7:39 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I'm intrigued as to why anyone would vote to play against good players rather than bad ones.
If I played chess for money I'd rather be up against, say, David Beckham than Gary Kasparov. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
boy273
High Card
Joined: 04 Nov 2007
Posts: 4
|
| Posted: Sat Jun 21, 2008 8:52 am Post subject: |
|
|
| i don't like bad player on my table, coz i don't want someone to bet 250 under gun for 72 off and the blind only 15/30...these player think poker is 90% luck |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
LostOstrich
Forum Ostrich
Joined: 11 Aug 2007
Posts: 4183
Location: In your bed, with your wife. Smoking your cigarettes, drinking your brandy.
|
| Posted: Sat Jun 21, 2008 8:59 am Post subject: |
|
|
| boy273 wrote: |
| i don't like bad player on my table, coz i don't want someone to bet 250 under gun for 72 off and the blind only 15/30...these player think poker is 90% luck |
Funny, that's exactly what I do want my opponents to do. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Fabio Aliprandi
Pair
Joined: 25 May 2008
Posts: 36
Location: Italy
|
| Posted: Sat Jun 21, 2008 10:41 am Post subject: |
|
|
| 4-6 bad players.. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
BBCOACH44
Full Tilt Coach
Joined: 24 Oct 2006
Posts: 3792
Location: Indoor Practice...AKA...Da Gym
|
| Posted: Sat Jun 21, 2008 10:50 am Post subject: |
|
|
| LostOstrich wrote: |
| boy273 wrote: |
| i don't like bad player on my table, coz i don't want someone to bet 250 under gun for 72 off and the blind only 15/30...these player think poker is 90% luck |
Funny, that's exactly what I do want my opponents to do. |
+1 What LO said.....     |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
nilgiri
Message Board Junkie
Joined: 11 Jan 2007
Posts: 2110
Location: New Hampshire
|
| Posted: Sat Jun 21, 2008 12:24 pm Post subject: |
|
|
To some degree I would like players not to be so bad that they are unpredictable. That is, I want their actions to make sense -- sense in a way that I know how best to react. I think the bad predictable players are much more exploitable -- and thus profitable -- than bad unpredictable players.
And so I think when people complain about bad players and want to play with "good" players, this is the concept they are getting at. They don't really want to play with good players, they want to play with bad, predictable players. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
HuJwang
Forum Blight
Joined: 20 Aug 2006
Posts: 6431
Location: Halifax, NS
|
| Posted: Sat Jun 21, 2008 5:43 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| nilgiri wrote: |
To some degree I would like players not to be so bad that they are unpredictable. That is, I want their actions to make sense -- sense in a way that I know how best to react. I think the bad predictable players are much more exploitable -- and thus profitable -- than bad unpredictable players.
And so I think when people complain about bad players and want to play with "good" players, this is the concept they are getting at. They don't really want to play with good players, they want to play with bad, predictable players. |
bad, unpredictable players are the most profitable types out there. they're just a lot higher variance. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
live4freerolls
Message Board Junkie
Joined: 23 Nov 2006
Posts: 2499
Location: Grindin
|
| Posted: Sat Jun 21, 2008 5:44 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| LOL 6-9 isn't in the lead. Seriously people ? |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Flying_Kiwi
Message Board Junkie
Joined: 03 Sep 2006
Posts: 6534
Location: somewhere spacific
|
| Posted: Sat Jun 21, 2008 6:02 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| live4freerolls wrote: |
| LOL 6-9 isn't in the lead. Seriously people ? |
There must be lots of bad players voting. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
BBCOACH44
Full Tilt Coach
Joined: 24 Oct 2006
Posts: 3792
Location: Indoor Practice...AKA...Da Gym
|
| Posted: Sat Jun 21, 2008 6:05 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| live4freerolls wrote: |
| LOL 6-9 isn't in the lead. Seriously people ? |
It is now................  |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
FAQ
Search
Register
Profile
Log in to check your private messages
Log in
