|
| Author |
Message |
--pde1969-- High Card
Joined: 30 Mar 2008 Posts: 13 Location: England, UK
|
Posted: Wed May 28, 2008 7:16 am Post subject: Can I really learn playing low stakes? |
|
|
Hi all - first post so please be gentle!
I have a simple question - What, realistically, can I expect to learn from playing low stakes SNG and MTTs?
I have been playing for about a year and quite intensively over the last three months. In addition to playing I have been reading .. Brunson, Sklansky, Harrington etc as advised on these fair boards. So, I feel I grasp the fundamentals regarding starting hands, position, stack sizes, bets, odds etc etc but it seems almost impossible to apply them at low stakes whilst trying to learn.
Does that sound fair or arrogant? I try and put players on hands or ranges based on their play but things don't come out as I expect. I don't think I should win every pot and I am realistic of my own ability but my plays seem to be completely thrown in the air by players who call with (what I and my literature call ....) ridiculous hands out of position etc.
I try and apply good logic and solid basic fundamentals of poker but, against players who play any two cards and call any all-in with them "just for the gamble" doesn't seem to work as I sort-of expect. Again, no "I must win" arrogance here ...
So, do I need to play at high(er)levels to get through this and learn from better players or, do I need to sit tight and keep trying, learning and, at some point, a bit of winning.
thanks for anything and everything!
 |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
RunnerJohn Two Pair
Joined: 16 Apr 2008 Posts: 71 Location: Cartersville, Georgia
|
Posted: Wed May 28, 2008 10:36 am Post subject: |
|
|
I've only been playing since January, so I'm quite a bit newer than you. I lost my ass at the cash tables for three months before I started playing $2.00 SNG's. Then my game started changing. In the SNGs, even at the lowest levels, I've started developing my skills. However, I still managed to lose quite a bit. In the past two weeks or so, I've been playing $6.00 SNGs and I've tripled my bankroll. I like to think that it's that I've learned to play better, but that's not all. At the lowest levels, you get a lot of people who play it almost like a slot machine. It's only two bucks, right? So why not just gamble? So, I think as your own skill develops, you will definately do yourself a service by moving up in buyins.
That's my opinion, and what else counts? lol |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
dontmarryher Full House
Joined: 13 Apr 2008 Posts: 166 Location: Paris France
|
Posted: Wed May 28, 2008 1:37 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Hello,
He is correct. At low stakes,people gamble more, and also do not understand maybe the fondamentals so.I think at these stakes one must tighten up just a bit. I agree at higher stakes,people who know what they do can win more.
Look at chris fergusson experiment . It took a long time for him to get any money while playing low stakes , though once he hit higher stakes, he wins more.
All the same, you can hone your skills a lot cheaper on low stakes as at high stakes.
Good luck
Dontmarryher |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
KGBlovesOreos Moderator
Joined: 28 Jun 2005 Posts: 5319 Location: VA
|
Posted: Wed May 28, 2008 1:46 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I believe you absolutely need to be able to beat the stakes you currently play for before you move up. Yes, there are MANY more players willing to gamble at the lower stakes, but if you aren't able to adapt and adjust to these players at these levels, you'll have a hard time adapting and adjusting to the more complex players at the higher stakes games.
Just stay where you are, be VERY patient, and grind it out until your BANKROLL is ready for the next level. Only at that point should you evaluate whether or not you are ready skill-wise to move up in stakes. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
--pde1969-- High Card
Joined: 30 Mar 2008 Posts: 13 Location: England, UK
|
Posted: Wed May 28, 2008 4:08 pm Post subject: |
|
|
OK. Thanks for the replies guys.
I sort of feel I have to be able to beat the level I am playing at rather than wonder about everyone else. It does seem a little too easy to blame other people for what may well be my short comings ....
So, here we go on a low stakes grind!  |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
JDizzzle72 Royal Flush
Joined: 01 Mar 2008 Posts: 533
|
Posted: Wed May 28, 2008 6:43 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Correct, worry about yourself first. If you can't seem to be able to make a profit, look for leaks in your own game first before blaming the level of play around you.
The micro levels ARE in fact beatable, I promise you that. And you have to show a profit at your current level before you move up. If you can't beat the lowest level of competition where you should show profit if you keep putting yourself in what you believe to be +EV situations, then IMO there's a leak on your part. Keep at it thought and keep improvign your game. I'm sure you'll show progress soon enough. GL! |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
XPLODO High Card
Joined: 29 May 2008 Posts: 1
|
Posted: Thu May 29, 2008 1:20 pm Post subject: Re: Can I really learn playing low stakes? |
|
|
| --pde1969-- wrote: |
I have been playing for about a year and quite intensively over the last three months. In addition to playing I have been reading .. Brunson, Sklansky, Harrington etc as advised on these fair boards. So, I feel I grasp the fundamentals regarding starting hands, position, stack sizes, bets, odds etc etc but it seems almost impossible to apply them at low stakes whilst trying to learn.
 |
The problem with trying to apply the advice found in most poker literature to low stakes games, is that it doesn't translate well. Super System, and many other books, are geared towards high end stakes. I read Super System while I was playing 5-10$ SNG's, and it absolutely wrecked me.
I agree with the consensus that you need to be able to beat lowish stakes to advance as a player, but I think you may want to read those books again after you've ascended a few ranks, they'll be a lot more relevant.
The best thing about micro stakes is that, you get a ton of practice with next to zero risk. Also, you avoid severely tilting when losing doesn't hurt as much, therefore you're able to keep a cool head when running bad.
There's not much money to be made, but you definitely gain in most other facets.
Best of luck. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
joeqnight Pair
Joined: 02 May 2007 Posts: 34
|
Posted: Fri May 30, 2008 2:22 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| What you learn at the low stakes game is patience. Tighting up and patience at the low stakes is absolutely important if you want to beat them. Yeah there are some advanced techniques you can't apply in the lower stakes that u must make when your player tougher games but as you move up, you can apply them then. You also have to remember that at these stakes many of the players just don't know fundamentals or are gambling for fun and don't really care about ev and all that stuff. Remember you can bluff a good player but you can't bluff a calling station that will call you all the way with bottom pair. Just grind it out. GL at the tables |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
--pde1969-- High Card
Joined: 30 Mar 2008 Posts: 13 Location: England, UK
|
Posted: Sat May 31, 2008 4:23 am Post subject: |
|
|
Hey guys, I really appreciate you taking the time to reply to my post. I'll take on board everything said and advised and keep on learning.
cheers!  |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|
Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group
|
|