Online Poker Room
Our Poker Players
Texas Hold Em Download
How To Play Poker
Full Tilt Poker
Real Money Poker Games
News & Promotions
Poker Store
Online Poker Affiliates
Full Tilt Poker
Online Poker Forum at Full Tilt Poker
  FAQFAQ   SearchSearch    RegisterRegister   ProfileProfile  Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages  Log inLog in 

Online Poker Forum - limit vs no-limit
Goto page 1, 2  Next
 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Online Poker Forum Home -> Fixed Limit Strategy Discussion
Author Message
Wahooka
Two Pair


Joined: 01 Nov 2005
Posts: 69

PostPosted: Sun Feb 26, 2006 4:24 pm    Post subject: limit vs no-limit Reply with quote

I've built my bankroll from $10 to $200 playing no-limit sit n goes as well as no-limit ring games online. I have a good feel for no-limit strategy... I decided to take my growing bankroll and try a limit structure. I've now had 5 losing sessions in a row... It is harder to bluff, tough to get a big pay-off, tough to know when to raise since most call anyways, and it just feels like a long boring grind... however, I know limit is important, especially since I wont likely play a no-limit game in a casino for my whole bankroll, too risky.. limit must be mastered cause its an important game that is played a lot by weak opponents and has opportunity for profit...

Any advice to improve my limit game?

Wahooka
Back to top
dmoore1998
Message Board Junkie


Joined: 20 Jan 2006
Posts: 1154
Location: Iowa

PostPosted: Sun Feb 26, 2006 6:30 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Assuming you are playing within your $200 bankroll that means you are playing pretty low limits. My advice to you is do NOT bluff at all. At a short handed table you can try it occasionally, but at a full table, bluffing at micro-limits doesn't work on a consistent basis because people will call with anything. When you do pick up a hand bet aggressively, because people will call you down. You're going to see a lot more suckouts than NL because you cannot bet enough to chase anyone out but you will also routinely get paid off by horrible hands or slim draws. I don't try anything fancy at these levels, no one understands that your check-raise is a sign of strength anyways. Basically keep it simple, play it straightforward, don't get fancy, and don't bluff unless you are heads-up post-flop...which won't happen much.
Back to top
Cobra69
Flush


Joined: 14 Jan 2006
Posts: 146

PostPosted: Sun Feb 26, 2006 8:02 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

thats good advice. You have to understand that in limit play (especially the low limits) most hands will go to a showdown, thus you need a hand that can hold up in a showdown situation. Don't bluff, especially in multi-way pots (there are very few exceptions, mainly if you have a good read and you're up against only one opponent). Limit play is very mechanical and will seem like a grind, but at the same time, solid play will bring in the money on a steady basis.
Back to top
IAmTheVietcong
Straight Flush


Joined: 14 Feb 2006
Posts: 355
Location: College

PostPosted: Sun Feb 26, 2006 11:56 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

I highly recommend that you read Hold'em Poker For Advanced Players by David Sklansky and Mason Malmuth. One of the best advanced Limit Hold'em books on the market. It has improved my limit Hold'em game massively.
Back to top
griffinlord
Message Board Junkie


Joined: 19 Jul 2005
Posts: 2459
Location: The Great Plains of South Dakota

PostPosted: Mon Feb 27, 2006 9:53 am    Post subject: Re: Reply with quote

In addition to the other good advice you've recieved I'm going to recommend

Winning Low Limit Hold'em by Lee Jones as your limit 101 course and Small Stakes Hold'em by Miller et all as your limit 201 course.

Another thing about limit is that you have much tighter starting hand requirements. NL players talk about getting their VP$IP stats down to around 25-28% while limit players talk about getting it down to around 18%!

Limit may seem boring, but it isn't. It is a much more subtle game than NL, but once you catch on to the subtlety it is quite exciting. Limit is more like chess while NL is more like WWF.
Back to top
mathman1115
Wizard of Odderation


Joined: 01 Sep 2005
Posts: 3077
Location: Land of the Fightin' Phillies

PostPosted: Mon Feb 27, 2006 10:15 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Never slowplay in limit, and don't get fancy. Most people don't pay attention long enough to know what you're doing anyway. ABC poker baby..........
Back to top
Wahooka
Two Pair


Joined: 01 Nov 2005
Posts: 69

PostPosted: Mon Feb 27, 2006 11:35 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Im not sure I understand the comparison of low-limit to chess...
since there is no fancy check-raising or bluffing, where is the
strategy? Sounds very much like a grind... wait for certain
starting hand in a certain position, bet your hand, and
hopefully you dont get drawn on... Also, I noticed in limit
you have to wait for the exact right scenario... eg if you
have pocket 66 you cant call a re-raise against 2 people,
you have to get the exact right calling odds pre-flop for
a 66 to hit and pay off... this feels more like blackjack
then chess! In no limit you can raise with 66, if you
flop a set you can get paid off huge! I dunno... just
my thoughts on limit, maybe I'm wrong..
Back to top
griffinlord
Message Board Junkie


Joined: 19 Jul 2005
Posts: 2459
Location: The Great Plains of South Dakota

PostPosted: Tue Feb 28, 2006 12:25 am    Post subject: Re: Reply with quote

Wahooka wrote:
Im not sure I understand the comparison of low-limit to chess...
since there is no fancy check-raising or bluffing, where is the
strategy? Sounds very much like a grind... wait for certain
starting hand in a certain position, bet your hand, and
hopefully you dont get drawn on... Also, I noticed in limit
you have to wait for the exact right scenario... eg if you
have pocket 66 you cant call a re-raise against 2 people,
you have to get the exact right calling odds pre-flop for
a 66 to hit and pay off... this feels more like blackjack
then chess! In no limit you can raise with 66, if you
flop a set you can get paid off huge! I dunno... just
my thoughts on limit, maybe I'm wrong..


The way you are describing NL it is the approach without a strategy. Raise your pocket pair, pray you hit a set and if you do push all in, otherwise fold. Not much strategy there.

Worse yet is the preflop all in push. Once called there is no strategy, just waiting for the cards to fall and determine the winner...sort of like betting at craps. But craps is all about action, not strategy.

Like chess, limit poker is played thoughtfully and deliberately. In both games you are looking to build small advantages into an overall winning strategy.
Back to top
Wahooka
Two Pair


Joined: 01 Nov 2005
Posts: 69

PostPosted: Tue Feb 28, 2006 1:22 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Well for me its raise with 66, hit my set, then use the right method to
get chips, might be checking and calling... i also might fold a set
under certain circumstances... at least I can protect my set against a draw if I choose,...also, if I miss my set I can still buy the pot,.. very complexed strategy

All in all I'd say both games are rich in strategy, but the very straight forward method you've described is not too complicated... dont bluff, wait for a hand, no free cards, bet your hand... just sounds to me like all it takes is patience..

Wahooka
Back to top
griffinlord
Message Board Junkie


Joined: 19 Jul 2005
Posts: 2459
Location: The Great Plains of South Dakota

PostPosted: Tue Feb 28, 2006 1:14 pm    Post subject: Re: Reply with quote

Wahooka wrote:


All in all I'd say both games are rich in strategy, but the very straight forward method you've described is not too complicated...
Wahooka


Well, I can't really describe the richness of chess strategy either. To appreciate the depth involved you have to play until you develop the skills to recognize the depth--or find someone with better writing skills than I have.

All I can tell you is that I was doing very well at the micro NL games but when I switched to limit I struggled...in large part because the strategy for good limit play was so much more complex than NL. At least for me it was. Reading & rereading the books I cited above have really helped.
Back to top
Wahooka
Two Pair


Joined: 01 Nov 2005
Posts: 69

PostPosted: Tue Feb 28, 2006 2:47 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Maybe you are referring to the fact that pot odds and math are more important in limit, and you have to have a very keen sense for numbers, and a good sense for hand selection... I think that is what you're getting at. I have read Lee Jones book on low-limit and I found his advice to be waaaay too tight for the $3-$6 games I played in Las Vegas. I was folding so many times before the flop that I got type-cast as a very tight player, and when I did enter the pot everyone knew I had AK, AQ, or some pocket pair...they also knew I'd fold if the flop missed me, or I'd fold middle pair as he advised, and I'd seldom bluff as he advocates...I got slaughtered due to the ultra-tight play!! Lee Jones book has lost me money! I think he needs to loosen his strategy...

Wahooka
Back to top
surreal1221
Two Pair


Joined: 08 Nov 2005
Posts: 53
Location: Columbia SC

PostPosted: Tue Feb 28, 2006 2:55 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

There is some nice limit advice here. I've been thinking about taking it up over the next couple of weeks. Thanks for the insight everyone.
Back to top
griffinlord
Message Board Junkie


Joined: 19 Jul 2005
Posts: 2459
Location: The Great Plains of South Dakota

PostPosted: Tue Feb 28, 2006 5:05 pm    Post subject: Re: Reply with quote

Wahooka wrote:
I have read Lee Jones book on low-limit and I found his advice to be waaaay too tight for the $3-$6 games I played in Las Vegas. <snip> Lee Jones book has lost me money! I think he needs to loosen his strategy...

Wahooka


I am surprised to hear that you are losing with it. He does advocate a fairly wide range of starting hands from cut-off and button so you should be coming in with a lot more than AK or AQ in late position.

I do know that the folks who claim to be winning at limit are playing 20% of their non-blind hands. So tight play is the general rule.

Miller et al's strategy is a bit looser and more aggressive--maybe that will work better for you.
Back to top
Wahooka
Two Pair


Joined: 01 Nov 2005
Posts: 69

PostPosted: Tue Feb 28, 2006 5:56 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Thanks for the advice... I think that Lee Jones wrote a great book, I certainly beat all my home games with that book. But when I went out to Vegas I think the competition gets better... people will notice that you are a tight player and so they will bet against you more often. Nothing in his book really prepares you for the sharks you have to face in real life. It took me a long time to learn that I do have to call or raise with a middle pair sometimes when people are just gonna bully you...
Back to top
stevn
Message Board Junkie


Joined: 19 Feb 2006
Posts: 1117

PostPosted: Thu Mar 02, 2006 3:59 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

howd u start wit 10 bucks?
Back to top
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Online Poker Forum Home -> Fixed Limit Strategy Discussion All times are GMT - 5 Hours
Goto page 1, 2  Next
Page 1 of 2

 


Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group