|
| Author |
Message |
Starvingwriter
Full House
Joined: 03 May 2008
Posts: 174
|
 Posted: Sun May 18, 2008 11:37 am Post subject: |
 |
|
| cookie778 wrote: |
Test was conducted by 10 people (9 plus myself) who all attend MIT.
|
No one attending MIT uses grammar and spelling as horribly as you do.
My final guess: You saw 21 in theaters, decided you were going to be God's Gift to Online Poker, failed horribly, and now you're looking for attention.
Seriously. There are so many flaws in your "I'm an MIT student" story, it's like you're not even trying. If you're going to blatantly lie, at least entertain us, for crying out loud. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
gmonsta84
High Card
Joined: 18 May 2008
Posts: 2
|
| Posted: Sun May 18, 2008 12:33 pm Post subject: |
|
|
My theory, having done zero statistical research, is as follows:
In lower limit games you have more "bad" players, who play hands that most experienced players would not be playing. You will likely also see more players per hand at lower limit tables. Many of these "bad" players will hang onto marginal hands until late in the hand, trying to get lucky and catch something, where a more experienced player may discard the same hand earlier, based on pot odds and whatnot. More players going deeper into hands increases the opportunities for you to get beaten.
The thing to remember is that even if you're say, an 80% favorite going into the river, you're still going to lose on average one out of five times. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Autosuggestion
Message Board Junkie
Joined: 02 May 2007
Posts: 1706
Location: New Jersey
|
| Posted: Sun May 18, 2008 11:06 pm Post subject: |
|
|
PV=NRT
Therefore, rigged. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Flying_Kiwi
Message Board Junkie
Joined: 03 Sep 2006
Posts: 6534
Location: somewhere spacific
|
| Posted: Sun May 18, 2008 11:14 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| rigged |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group
|
|
FAQ
Search
Register
Profile
Log in to check your private messages
Log in
