| Author |
Message |
Riddim
Moderator
Joined: 04 Dec 2005
Posts: 8176
Location: Sweden
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
IABoomer
Moderator
Joined: 29 Oct 2006
Posts: 4397
|
 Posted: Mon May 05, 2008 6:54 pm Post subject: |
 |
|
I almost feel like this would be better in the "Poker Stories" forum with the "rigged" posts.  |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
kyblue007
Royal Flush
Joined: 20 Nov 2006
Posts: 939
|
| Posted: Mon May 05, 2008 6:58 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Seems to be the definition of the "Peter Principle". A book that was published approximately 25 yrs ago......
That people are promoted to the level of their incompetence. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
audsb
Message Board Junkie
Joined: 23 Jul 2007
Posts: 1223
Location: Earth
|
| Posted: Mon May 05, 2008 7:02 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Quote: |
This deficiency in ``self-monitoring skills,'' the researchers said, helps explain the tendency of the humor-impaired to persist in telling jokes that are not funny, of day traders to repeatedly jump into the market -- and repeatedly lose out -- and of the politically clueless to continue holding forth at dinner parties on the fine points of campaign strategy. |
Sounds like my ex-boyfriend. 
...However in conclusion, luckily on interweb forums there aren't really "social norms" and it is okay to tell someone that they stink. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
rockycatt
Message Board Junkie
Joined: 02 Jan 2007
Posts: 3150
Location: WE WANT RAKE BACK
|
| Posted: Mon May 05, 2008 7:05 pm Post subject: |
|
|
i quicky wnt over this , and i believe this guy and hid partener
are lucky there liveing in the year 2008  :lol:After Desention |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
HuJwang
Forum Blight
Joined: 20 Aug 2006
Posts: 6431
Location: Halifax, NS
|
| Posted: Mon May 05, 2008 7:26 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| kyblue007 wrote: |
Seems to be the definition of the "Peter Principle". A book that was published approximately 25 yrs ago......
That people are promoted to the level of their incompetence. |
The article doesn't really have anything to do with the Peter Principle other than using the word "incompetence"... |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
dcdoorknob
Message Board Junkie
Joined: 11 May 2007
Posts: 1137
Location: Mississippi
|
| Posted: Mon May 05, 2008 7:59 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Man does this ever relate to poker. Often the most clueless players are the ones with the insanely big egos about their abilities. And I know for me at least, the more I've learned, the more I've realized how completely not special my pokering ability is. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
EJ CURSE
Flush
Joined: 18 Feb 2008
Posts: 148
|
| Posted: Mon May 05, 2008 11:35 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Excellent post and you need to be commended. Very interesting article, and extremely pertinant info to our cause. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
markljackson
Straight Flush
Joined: 12 Jul 2005
Posts: 362
|
| Posted: Tue May 06, 2008 12:14 am Post subject: |
|
|
wow! where to start. Sadly the Professor does seem incompetent, on many levels. Maybe he is just desperate for headlines, need them for tenure.
1. being ignorant does not make you incompetent. Many people who are NOT ignorant are incompetent. Lots of "well educated" folks who can barely dress themselves.
2. Most people who doubt their ability, do so for a couple of reasons. A) constant negative feedback from superiors/mentors/events/self B) One tragic experience that overshadows all good ones. Sadly we teach people to NOT aspire to greatness.
3. Having confidence in yourself is in no way indicative of: ignorance, incompetence, or inability. Any wonder #2 is true? Teaching people that being confident means your are incompetent is idiotic, and dangerous.
4. This is the worst reasoning I have seen in a long time. No surprise it's from an Ivy league school. Non sequiter after non sequiter.
I am so tired of the negative attitudes of the "well educated". The most offensive comment is that all of us are so stupid we can't learn to make better decisions. Unreal.
Now you see why kids today are so messed up. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
HuJwang
Forum Blight
Joined: 20 Aug 2006
Posts: 6431
Location: Halifax, NS
|
| Posted: Tue May 06, 2008 1:37 am Post subject: |
|
|
| markljackson wrote: |
wow! where to start. Sadly the Professor does seem incompetent, on many levels. Maybe he is just desperate for headlines, need them for tenure.
1. being ignorant does not make you incompetent. Many people who are NOT ignorant are incompetent. Lots of "well educated" folks who can barely dress themselves.
2. Most people who doubt their ability, do so for a couple of reasons. A) constant negative feedback from superiors/mentors/events/self B) One tragic experience that overshadows all good ones. Sadly we teach people to NOT aspire to greatness.
3. Having confidence in yourself is in no way indicative of: ignorance, incompetence, or inability. Any wonder #2 is true? Teaching people that being confident means your are incompetent is idiotic, and dangerous.
4. This is the worst reasoning I have seen in a long time. No surprise it's from an Ivy league school. Non sequiter after non sequiter.
I am so tired of the negative attitudes of the "well educated". The most offensive comment is that all of us are so stupid we can't learn to make better decisions. Unreal.
Now you see why kids today are so messed up. |
Let me guess: you supported Bush. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
bdbranch
Banned
Joined: 13 Mar 2008
Posts: 503
Location: At home wdyt. Btw. I'm not opinionated all the time, umm can you be opinionated when you're asleep
|
| Posted: Tue May 06, 2008 1:50 am Post subject: |
|
|
If I can write garbage like this, can I be a professor of psychology too? Please .... Pretty Please ...... Pretty Pretty Please.
Won't bother with most of the garbage, just the so-called test reasons. It says that the lowest 10% overestimated their ability. Well duh. They can hardly say, I'm in the lowest -20% now can they. The only thing that is possible is a over estimation in 'percentile' terms.
Secondly, the areas that were tested was deliberately designed to produce the result that he wanted. For instance, I believe that I've spelt everything here correctly. If I've made even a single mistake (for whatever reason) then that's automatically a overestimation.
To then use this result as a claim of arrogant or ignorant incompetence is absolutely flawed. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
bdbranch
Banned
Joined: 13 Mar 2008
Posts: 503
Location: At home wdyt. Btw. I'm not opinionated all the time, umm can you be opinionated when you're asleep
|
| Posted: Tue May 06, 2008 2:05 am Post subject: |
|
|
| HuJwang wrote: |
| markljackson wrote: |
wow! where to start. Sadly the Professor does seem incompetent, on many levels.
1. being ignorant does not make you incompetent.
2. Most people who doubt their ability, do so for a couple of reasons.
3. Having confidence in yourself is in no way indicative of: ignorance,
|
Let me guess: you supported Bush. |
Typical of HuJwang. Incapable of discussing things like growups.
| bdbranch wrote: |
| HuJwang wrote: |
| Ok this is getting nowhere. You're basically ignoring what I said and repeating the same stuff over and ove. I'm done here. |
Now I regularly disagree with the opinions of others, but still respect them as people. However there is one thing that I absolutely don't respect and that's people who demands complete and utter agreement with their particular viewpoint. And I don't respect those who shows themselves to be of this nature.
If HuJwang wants mindless beings around him, then he should pick up some of those Japanese robots that are for sale. And no, I don't respect him or anything that he has to say, regardless of whether I agree with him or not. |
Go throw another temper tantum HuJwang because somebody has disagreed with you. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Strasse
Forum Ego
Joined: 16 Nov 2005
Posts: 5151
Location: Austin, TX
|
| Posted: Tue May 06, 2008 2:32 am Post subject: |
|
|
| markljackson wrote: |
wow! where to start. Sadly the Professor does seem incompetent, on many levels. Maybe he is just desperate for headlines, need them for tenure.
1. being ignorant does not make you incompetent. Many people who are NOT ignorant are incompetent. Lots of "well educated" folks who can barely dress themselves.
2. Most people who doubt their ability, do so for a couple of reasons. A) constant negative feedback from superiors/mentors/events/self B) One tragic experience that overshadows all good ones. Sadly we teach people to NOT aspire to greatness.
3. Having confidence in yourself is in no way indicative of: ignorance, incompetence, or inability. Any wonder #2 is true? Teaching people that being confident means your are incompetent is idiotic, and dangerous.
4. This is the worst reasoning I have seen in a long time. No surprise it's from an Ivy league school. Non sequiter after non sequiter.
I am so tired of the negative attitudes of the "well educated". The most offensive comment is that all of us are so stupid we can't learn to make better decisions. Unreal.
Now you see why kids today are so messed up. |
You have no evidence to support anything, just these statements that you claim as fact, while the article offers many experiments conducted to support its conclusions. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
dumwaldo
Message Board Junkie
Joined: 23 May 2006
Posts: 1656
Location: look to the stars
|
| Posted: Tue May 06, 2008 3:46 am Post subject: |
|
|
| HuJwang wrote: |
| markljackson wrote: |
wow! where to start. Sadly the Professor does seem incompetent, on many levels. Maybe he is just desperate for headlines, need them for tenure.
1. being ignorant does not make you incompetent. Many people who are NOT ignorant are incompetent. Lots of "well educated" folks who can barely dress themselves.
2. Most people who doubt their ability, do so for a couple of reasons. A) constant negative feedback from superiors/mentors/events/self B) One tragic experience that overshadows all good ones. Sadly we teach people to NOT aspire to greatness.
3. Having confidence in yourself is in no way indicative of: ignorance, incompetence, or inability. Any wonder #2 is true? Teaching people that being confident means your are incompetent is idiotic, and dangerous.
4. This is the worst reasoning I have seen in a long time. No surprise it's from an Ivy league school. Non sequiter after non sequiter.
I am so tired of the negative attitudes of the "well educated". The most offensive comment is that all of us are so stupid we can't learn to make better decisions. Unreal.
Now you see why kids today are so messed up. |
Let me guess: you supported Bush. |
Why are you are incapable of discussing something without making personal attacks?
I suppose a better question might be why do moderators on this forum allow you to do it when you are doing it so frequently?
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
dumwaldo
Message Board Junkie
Joined: 23 May 2006
Posts: 1656
Location: look to the stars
|
| Posted: Tue May 06, 2008 3:53 am Post subject: |
|
|
| Strasse wrote: |
| markljackson wrote: |
wow! where to start. Sadly the Professor does seem incompetent, on many levels. Maybe he is just desperate for headlines, need them for tenure.
1. being ignorant does not make you incompetent. Many people who are NOT ignorant are incompetent. Lots of "well educated" folks who can barely dress themselves.
2. Most people who doubt their ability, do so for a couple of reasons. A) constant negative feedback from superiors/mentors/events/self B) One tragic experience that overshadows all good ones. Sadly we teach people to NOT aspire to greatness.
3. Having confidence in yourself is in no way indicative of: ignorance, incompetence, or inability. Any wonder #2 is true? Teaching people that being confident means your are incompetent is idiotic, and dangerous.
4. This is the worst reasoning I have seen in a long time. No surprise it's from an Ivy league school. Non sequiter after non sequiter.
I am so tired of the negative attitudes of the "well educated". The most offensive comment is that all of us are so stupid we can't learn to make better decisions. Unreal.
Now you see why kids today are so messed up. |
You have no evidence to support anything, just these statements that you claim as fact, while the article offers many experiments conducted to support its conclusions. |
Actually I think what mark wrote is based on common sense and what you have written is based on blind faith. I say this because the article does not "offers many experiments conducted to support its conclusions". No, It offers the conclusions made by ONE person after ONE study and he does not provide the data he used to draw this conclusion. There is nothing about sample size. There is nothing about complete results. There is no way for a reader to make an informed opinion based on this article.
There is also the fundamental problem that while psychiatry is a proven science, psychology is NOT. Many people misunderstand that.
DW |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
FAQ
Search
Register
Profile
Log in to check your private messages
Log in
