| Author |
Message |
FatStacks06 Royal Flush
Joined: 26 Jan 2006 Posts: 736
|
Posted: Thu Feb 16, 2006 1:37 pm Post subject: Anyone play the new 90 persons SNGs yet? |
|
|
| Fantastic! I was thinking of swtiching to PokerStars to get in some more frequent MTT action, man was I surprised last night. Great job! I highly recommend these! |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
never_scurred Three of a Kind
Joined: 09 Jan 2006 Posts: 89
|
Posted: Thu Feb 16, 2006 2:23 pm Post subject: |
|
|
How much time did it take to complete the tourney??? I've been looking them, but have stayed away.
I would rather play a 3 table SNG. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
FatStacks06 Royal Flush
Joined: 26 Jan 2006 Posts: 736
|
Posted: Thu Feb 16, 2006 2:39 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| It took about 2 hours, but everyone was playing EXTREMELY tight. The blind structure got up to 1500/3000 which for most people was about 1/5 of their stack. I would say it would pbably take about 90-120 minutes to make it through one in the money. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
JS13_TPS Straight Flush
Joined: 20 Jul 2005 Posts: 445 Location: Georgia
|
Posted: Thu Feb 16, 2006 3:48 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I have been peeking in on these. Seems like it's down to about 27 by first break, and they're winind up withing a 10 minutes or so, plus or minus 2 hours.
Hopefully i'll be done with this sinus medication by tomorrow and i can see past my nose to what the cards are. LOL. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
never_scurred Three of a Kind
Joined: 09 Jan 2006 Posts: 89
|
Posted: Thu Feb 16, 2006 3:50 pm Post subject: |
|
|
what is your strategy for this new SNG structure??? Do you play it like one big ol' SNG? I might try one later tonight while multi-ing a regular SNG. Did you make the money?
I'm a little worried that several MTT specialist will invade this game, because of less competition (90 plr vs 500++.) |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
never_scurred Three of a Kind
Joined: 09 Jan 2006 Posts: 89
|
Posted: Thu Feb 16, 2006 3:52 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| JS13, it's nice to see Georgia ppl in cyber space. Good luck with the 90 plr sng's and get better. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
FatStacks06 Royal Flush
Joined: 26 Jan 2006 Posts: 736
|
Posted: Thu Feb 16, 2006 5:01 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Well... You kind of have to play it like a MTT only you can play a lot tighter since you only need to have about 9000 to make the final table comfortably. That's doubling up twice (1500-3000-6000) and then playing solid poker and picking off the short stacks. You don't have to race nearly as much and you can pick your spots. Around the bubble it plays ALOT like a MTT though. So those skill sets definitely come in handy. But the pay outs arent as big that it would be worth a MTT players time except at above the $11 level. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Strasse Forum Ego
Joined: 16 Nov 2005 Posts: 5038 Location: Austin, TX
|
Posted: Thu Feb 16, 2006 6:01 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| I am no MTT specialist, but I played a $1 90 player SNG the other day and won it. It took about 110-115 minutes to complete, and was a lot of fun. It plays a lot like a MTT around the bubble, although there are no antes, so stealing pots preflop isnt as profitable. Things are very wild and loose in the beginning, so you should sit back. Once it gets closer to the bubble, the best way to pick up large pots is to come over the top of people when you think they are weak. This way you can avoid a lot of confrontation, only having to steal every once in a while, and continue to grow your stack. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Zophar Moderator
Joined: 26 Oct 2005 Posts: 3621 Location: East Coast
|
Posted: Thu Feb 16, 2006 6:08 pm Post subject: Re: |
|
|
| never_scurred wrote: |
what is your strategy for this new SNG structure??? Do you play it like one big ol' SNG? I might try one later tonight while multi-ing a regular SNG. Did you make the money?
I'm a little worried that several MTT specialist will invade this game, because of less competition (90 plr vs 500++.) |
Because of the speed of the blind increases, I played it more like a speed poker tourney. Tight/aggressive at 1st, then extremely aggressive as the blinds really get up there if you have a stack to push with. Once they hit about 300/600, most people had only about 6x's the BB, so they were waiting for hands to go allin. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Ryans77 High Card
Joined: 17 Feb 2006 Posts: 1
|
Posted: Fri Feb 17, 2006 1:57 pm Post subject: 90 Man SNG's |
|
|
| I have played 2 $5+.50 90 man SNG's and I love them! I placed in 6th on my 1st one for $27 and I won the 2nd one for $144. Absolutely the best addition by far!!! I wish they kept the 90 man $10+1, but I understand why they made them 45 man. I registered for them 2 days in a row and they never went past 30 people registered. Yesterday I played in a $10+1 45 man and placed 19th after the guy went runner runner for a straight. I do with they kept the $10+1 45 man Double Stack, like the 90 man were. The Double Stack would make up the difference in 45 man and 90 man. So if the Full Tilt Support Staff reads this, make the $10+1 45 man SNG's Double Stack! |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
TilterMarkus Site Admin
Joined: 16 Feb 2006 Posts: 198 Location: Full Tilt Poker
|
Posted: Fri Feb 17, 2006 2:06 pm Post subject: |
|
|
The reason we dropped the double stack from the $10 one was the majority of the feedback we were getting indicated people looked to these multi-table SNGs for the feel of a MTT but with a much smaller time commitment. The double stack on top of that concept just confused the issue.
Thanks for the feedback, we're glad you're enjoying the new multi-table SNGs! |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
JS13_TPS Straight Flush
Joined: 20 Jul 2005 Posts: 445 Location: Georgia
|
Posted: Fri Feb 17, 2006 5:32 pm Post subject: |
|
|
good grief.
I ran into the 2 luckiest players alive today in two of the $1. The second one was ridiculous. min raise the BB every hand, hit almost every flop. Calls off major portions of their stack with J2o all in, hits a straight, K4o all in, flops a boat. Finally I'm down to about 6x BB and see pokcet 7's. Open push, who calls but the luck sack, holding AA, and flops an A. If I had raised, they would have reraised obviously, but come on. The amount of suckouts they had was off the wall.
no, online poker isn't rigged. I'm just amazed at how some players can make some of the calls they did. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|