| Author |
Message |
conanav Pair
Joined: 02 Sep 2007 Posts: 22
|
Posted: Sun Sep 02, 2007 12:26 pm Post subject: Mathematics of Omaha |
|
|
Hello
I am mostly a PL Hold'em player, and only recently I started playing NL Omaha Hi. I have to say that Omaha must be the most mathematically challanging out of all the poker games. Do you guys know of any good books that discuss the probabilities of Omaha and the most succesfull way of interpreting pot odds in this game. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Tarvin Full House
Joined: 06 Mar 2007 Posts: 169
|
Posted: Wed Sep 05, 2007 1:26 pm Post subject: |
|
|
"Hello
I am mostly a PL Hold'em player, and only recently I started playing NL Omaha Hi. I have to say that Omaha must be the most mathematically challanging out of all the poker games. Do you guys know of any good books that discuss the probabilities of Omaha and the most succesfull way of interpreting pot odds in this game."
This confuses me.
To answer your question, no I don't. Sorry. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
conanav Pair
Joined: 02 Sep 2007 Posts: 22
|
Posted: Wed Sep 12, 2007 11:52 am Post subject: |
|
|
| you are absolutely right. It was suppose to be the other way around. NL holdem, and PL Omaha hi. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
conanav Pair
Joined: 02 Sep 2007 Posts: 22
|
Posted: Wed Sep 12, 2007 11:52 am Post subject: |
|
|
| you are absolutely right. It was suppose to be the other way around. NL holdem, and PL Omaha hi. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
conanav Pair
Joined: 02 Sep 2007 Posts: 22
|
Posted: Wed Sep 12, 2007 11:52 am Post subject: |
|
|
| you are absolutely right. It was suppose to be the other way around. NL holdem, and PL Omaha hi. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
conanav Pair
Joined: 02 Sep 2007 Posts: 22
|
Posted: Wed Sep 12, 2007 11:52 am Post subject: |
|
|
| you are absolutely right. It was suppose to be the other way around. NL holdem, and PL Omaha hi. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
conanav Pair
Joined: 02 Sep 2007 Posts: 22
|
Posted: Wed Sep 12, 2007 11:52 am Post subject: |
|
|
| you are absolutely right. It was suppose to be the other way around. NL holdem, and PL Omaha hi. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
uh-oh Four of a Kind
Joined: 27 Jul 2005 Posts: 346 Location: Annoying U
|
Posted: Sun Sep 16, 2007 9:50 am Post subject: |
|
|
| I play nlO in ring, just not at tilt. Whether it's nl or pl doesn't change the math. Too bad I can't guide you to a good book offhand. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
renegades8 Forum Fish
Joined: 26 Nov 2006 Posts: 3632 Location: spewing @ 25NL
|
Posted: Mon Sep 24, 2007 10:22 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I'm not really sure about books specifically for odds, but...
This link has a few omaha books:
http://www.pokernews.com/books/omaha-poker/
Some other books I have heard of (not sure how good they are, though) include:
How Good Is Your Pot-Limit Omaha by Stewart Reuben
Secrets of Professional Pot-Limit Omaha by by Rolf Slotboom
Additionally, the PLO sections of SS2 and FTP Strategy Guide Tournament Edition are apparently fairly good.
Also, I thought this was an excellent article:
http://www.bet-the-pot.com/pot-limit-omaha-page35.html |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Uncle_Buz Four of a Kind
Joined: 29 Mar 2006 Posts: 256 Location: Tampa (formerly Ann Arbor)
|
Posted: Wed Oct 24, 2007 4:41 pm Post subject: NLH vs PLO |
|
|
Winner's Guide to Omaha Poker by Ken Warren has an entire chaper on the 56 differences between Hold'Em and Omaha as well as odds charts and out percentages.
It also talks a lot about High-Low so some of the recommendations get confusing. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Deano7889 High Card
Joined: 01 Nov 2007 Posts: 11
|
Posted: Fri Nov 02, 2007 3:44 am Post subject: |
|
|
| I do not know any good books, but one thing I know is that after you figure out the odds, there is a lot more important things you need to know. there is knowing how to bet, how to read people, how to get people to call/fold their hands without risking it all. The one most important thing I have learned by playing poker on this website is that if you are bluffing, it is better to raise it about one third of the other peoples chips. Then they think you have an amazing hand and want them to call, where as if you go all in people tend to think you are making them risk it all because of your insecurity of your hand and that you dont want them to call. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Deano7889 High Card
Joined: 01 Nov 2007 Posts: 11
|
Posted: Fri Nov 02, 2007 3:44 am Post subject: |
|
|
| I do not know any good books, but one thing I know is that after you figure out the odds, there is a lot more important things you need to know. there is knowing how to bet, how to read people, how to get people to call/fold their hands without risking it all. The one most important thing I have learned by playing poker on this website is that if you are bluffing, it is better to raise it about one third of the other peoples chips. Then they think you have an amazing hand and want them to call, where as if you go all in people tend to think you are making them risk it all because of your insecurity of your hand and that you dont want them to call. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
TinyCities High Card
Joined: 02 Nov 2007 Posts: 3
|
Posted: Mon Nov 05, 2007 9:52 am Post subject: |
|
|
Secrets of Professional Pot-Limit Omaha by by Rolf Slotboom
my favourite book, like his style |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Nobody4727 Straight Flush
Joined: 30 Nov 2007 Posts: 360 Location: God's practical joke
|
Posted: Sat Dec 08, 2007 12:33 am Post subject: |
|
|
| renegades8 wrote: |
I'm not really sure about books specifically for odds, but...
This link has a few omaha books:
http://www.pokernews.com/books/omaha-poker/
Some other books I have heard of (not sure how good they are, though) include:
How Good Is Your Pot-Limit Omaha by Stewart Reuben
Secrets of Professional Pot-Limit Omaha by by Rolf Slotboom
Additionally, the PLO sections of SS2 and FTP Strategy Guide Tournament Edition are apparently fairly good.
Also, I thought this was an excellent article:
http://www.bet-the-pot.com/pot-limit-omaha-page35.html |
Thank you much for the article link. It was indeed an excellent read. Well thought out and very informative. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|