|
| Author |
Message |
pokerfreak666
Royal Flush
Joined: 03 Nov 2005
Posts: 617
Location: Orlando, FL
|
 Posted: Sat Apr 07, 2007 9:12 pm Post subject: Worst call ever? followed by one out. |
 |
|
He used the usual excuse, "i though u were bluffing, and i had notes on him , he was a fish and a losing player. SO i played it strong and boom.
Thoughts.
Full Tilt Poker Game #2160884120: Table Vole (heads up) - $0.50/$1 - Pot Limit Omaha - 21:41:58 ET - 2007/04/07
Seat 1: MiLoski ($54.35)
Seat 2: PokerFreak666 ($96.95)
MiLoski posts the small blind of $0.50
PokerFreak666 posts the big blind of $1
The button is in seat #1
*** HOLE CARDS ***
Dealt to PokerFreak666 [2c Kh Td Qd]
MiLoski raises to $3
PokerFreak666 calls $2
*** FLOP *** [6c Ks 2d]
PokerFreak666 checks
MiLoski bets $5
PokerFreak666 raises to $21
MiLoski calls $16
*** TURN *** [6c Ks 2d] [As]
PokerFreak666 bets $38
MiLoski calls $30.35, and is all in
PokerFreak666 shows [2c Kh Td Qd]
MiLoski shows [Qc 9d Qh 8s]
Uncalled bet of $7.65 returned to PokerFreak666
*** RIVER *** [6c Ks 2d As] [Qs]
PokerFreak666 shows two pair, Kings and Queens
MiLoski shows three of a kind, Queens
MiLoski wins the pot ($108.20) with three of a kind, Queens
*** SUMMARY ***
Total pot $108.70 | Rake $0.50
Board: [6c Ks 2d As Qs]
Seat 1: MiLoski (small blind) showed [Qc 9d Qh 8s] and won ($108.20) with three of a kind, Queens
Seat 2: PokerFreak666 (big blind) showed [2c Kh Td Qd] and lost with two pair, Kings and Queens |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
HuJwang
Forum Blight
Joined: 20 Aug 2006
Posts: 6431
Location: Halifax, NS
|
| Posted: Sat Apr 07, 2007 9:34 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| wow. QQ is pretty weak there in holdem, let alone omaha. reload and get him back i guess. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
BKMastermind375
Pair
Joined: 08 Aug 2006
Posts: 34
Location: Rochester, NY or Clemson, SC
|
| Posted: Sat Apr 07, 2007 11:13 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Yeah; it is a bad beat, but it was avoidable. First, I don't really like your call preflop w/ KQT2. It's not really a great hand, and you're out of position for the rest of the action. I'd imagine your somewhere near a 3:2 dog preflop (I'm too lazy to plug it into Twodimes right now).
Second; I think your turn bet is awful. Any aces up will beat you, or any kings up. Once he calls the flop, I think you have to go into check call/fold mode once the ace hits. Of course, you have notes on him, so that's up to your discretion. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
pokerfreak666
Royal Flush
Joined: 03 Nov 2005
Posts: 617
Location: Orlando, FL
|
| Posted: Sun Apr 08, 2007 4:19 am Post subject: |
|
|
| You're pretty much right that my hand was not that strong and vulnerable, but I only played it because of the way he was playing and put him on an air flop and a very weak hand, but not QQ. Just dont know how he called even if i was bluffing,. i had to have outs in worst case. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
jbrennen
Straight Flush
Joined: 16 Aug 2005
Posts: 422
|
| Posted: Sun Apr 08, 2007 6:53 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| BKMastermind375 wrote: |
| Yeah; it is a bad beat, but it was avoidable. First, I don't really like your call preflop w/ KQT2. |
Why would he want to avoid this bad beat? I mean, yeah, it's a real kick in the nuts when the case Queen falls on the river, but that's the one part of the hand he couldn't control. Other than that, seems like he had a perfect read on the guy and just suffered the consequences when his opponent hit the lottery.
This is definitely not the type of hand where you go back and analyze your play to see what you could have done differently... |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
BKMastermind375
Pair
Joined: 08 Aug 2006
Posts: 34
Location: Rochester, NY or Clemson, SC
|
| Posted: Sun Apr 08, 2007 11:52 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| jbrennen wrote: |
| BKMastermind375 wrote: |
| Yeah; it is a bad beat, but it was avoidable. First, I don't really like your call preflop w/ KQT2. |
Why would he want to avoid this bad beat? |
I don't think I worded that statement too well. I should have said that he could have avoided losing all his money on that hand, especially when the ace turned. Obviously; there was no way he could put him on something as weak as QQxx when he flat called the flop raise, but if this guy was as fishy as pokerfreak says, AKxx pops right into my head. I just think that this is an easy check fold on the turn for two reasons:
A) If he has AKxx, we have 2 boat outs on the turn. If pokerfreak had spade redraws, then I absolutely agree in putting the money in here. But since he doesn't, why put most of your money in when your two pair is likely to be no good anymore. The only hand you can really beat on the turn is something like JJ62.
B) This ties into my first point, but why put your money in against a bad player w/ such marginal hand on the turn? If you had such an edge on this guy, why not wait for when you had a virtual lock on the hand, and catch him overplaying some junk?
While that did happen here, there's no way to put him on a hand as weak as QQ in this spot based on the flop action. Heck, he could even have something as bad as A6xx or A2xx, and we're still in awful shape (no more than 4 outs) on the turn. I just think that pokerfreak could have saved his money for a better spot to bust this guy than this hand. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group
|
|
FAQ
Search
Register
Profile
Log in to check your private messages
Log in
