| Author |
Message |
NobAzn Four of a Kind
Joined: 28 Dec 2005 Posts: 294 Location: Monterey Park, CA
|
Posted: Mon Apr 03, 2006 12:13 pm Post subject: Critique this B&M hand |
|
|
Yesterday, playing a 1-3NL game. I'm on right of the dealer button with about $85, 5 players limp in and I look down at 77 so I raise it to $12, dealers calls, SB calls then BB raises to $27, then the surprising thing is all but one limper called so, it is $15 more chips for me to call, and I assume everyone has each others outs so I push all in and get 4 callers.
Flop comes 7 high no paint, no flush or straight possible and I take down a $350+ pot excluding tip, rake, badbeat jackpot.
So my question is was it right for me to assume that everyone had each others outs? and would you have pushed all in to try to isolate a player? or was I a donk and just gotten lucky  |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
deadmoney314 Message Board Junkie
Joined: 16 Jul 2005 Posts: 3226 Location: grunching through reply posts
|
Posted: Mon Apr 03, 2006 12:23 pm Post subject: nl |
|
|
| If you have the bankroll I like your play. A lot of the time its an isolation steal in my experience, which is what you were thinking--high cards. If that's the case, you have +++++money in the pot for your coinflip if it becomes heads up. If everyone is duplicating cards, then definately its a play that will lose more than 50% of the time, but the $$ won each time you win more than covers the losses. As soon as there is a pocket pair higher than yours in the mix though, you are toast in the long run. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
refugee Pair
Joined: 16 Jan 2006 Posts: 38
|
Posted: Mon Apr 03, 2006 12:32 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| what did the bb reraise with? |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
junkbutton Message Board Junkie
Joined: 17 Feb 2006 Posts: 4043 Location: Gutterrock, NY
|
Posted: Mon Apr 03, 2006 12:59 pm Post subject: Re: |
|
|
| refugee wrote: |
| what did the bb reraise with? |
...and did anyone have a higher pocket pair than your 7's?
I think I would have just called there, and then gotten my money in with the trips, but your play worked out too. Good job! |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
NobAzn Four of a Kind
Joined: 28 Dec 2005 Posts: 294 Location: Monterey Park, CA
|
Posted: Mon Apr 03, 2006 1:02 pm Post subject: |
|
|
BB had aces, one of the limpers had queens but the rest of the table told me they had ace jack, ace queen, one guy didn't tell me
When I saw this, I thought to myself "man, I played this hand bad and got lucky" |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
junkbutton Message Board Junkie
Joined: 17 Feb 2006 Posts: 4043 Location: Gutterrock, NY
|
Posted: Mon Apr 03, 2006 1:38 pm Post subject: Re: |
|
|
| NobAzn wrote: |
When I saw this, I thought to myself "man, I played this hand bad and got lucky" |
As long as you learned from this, and don't let a lucky play go to your head, you'll be all right. It's the people who do this and don't learn from it that I want at my table... |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
refugee Pair
Joined: 16 Jan 2006 Posts: 38
|
Posted: Tue Apr 04, 2006 1:43 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| I actually don't mind the all-in play. It seems that you were committed to this hand regardless, and after a call you would have $58 left with a sizable pot in front of you, almost forcing an all in anyways. The only question for me would be, how big is the pot in front of me compared to my stack? If the implied odds made it worthwhile, I'd push; if not, call. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
NobAzn Four of a Kind
Joined: 28 Dec 2005 Posts: 294 Location: Monterey Park, CA
|
Posted: Tue Apr 04, 2006 2:51 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| This was actually a bad play because $58 is not short stacked in a 1-3nl game. I had more then enough chips but I wanted to isolate to go for a heads up situation, I raised with them because I was in late position, and went all in because I didn't think 77 will hold up against 4+ players. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
aztecgator Two Pair
Joined: 28 Jul 2005 Posts: 70
|
Posted: Wed Apr 05, 2006 2:43 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I think your play was risky and you got lucky. The BB has seen 5 limpers plus a raiser (you) and STILL reraises the pot. I don't know what kind of player he is, but that normally indicates a very strong hand (AA, KK, QQ or AK). I know you were trying to isolate him with your all in reraise, but for that to work a number of things have to fall into place (1) the other players have to fold, (2) he has to have AK (or, in general, two over cards) and (3) (although not necessary but nice) if he just has over cards many or all of his outs are in the muck. The first assumption might have been reasonable, but the latter two are simply too risky to make.
If he has a high pocket pair he doesn't need any outs against you. I think calling his raise (especially after others called ahead of you) and seeing the flop is the more prudent strategy. If a 7 flops, you are all in and will take down a nice pot; if a 7 does not hit, you can fold. The point is, you will have not risked your entire stack on either very risky assumptions or a 2 out draw. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
NobAzn Four of a Kind
Joined: 28 Dec 2005 Posts: 294 Location: Monterey Park, CA
|
Posted: Wed Apr 05, 2006 3:54 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| read again, I did not limp I was a first raiser, and gotten reraise by the BB. I went all in because I wanted to go HU because 77 usually does not hold up against a lot of players. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
AmplifiedSAE Two Pair
Joined: 22 Mar 2006 Posts: 67
|
Posted: Wed Apr 05, 2006 7:08 pm Post subject: |
|
|
To be honest, I think this was a HORRIBLE play that you got away with.
#1 There was a re-raise, and a call already in front of you. You need to have the goods when this happens.
#2 You're risking your whole stack pre-flop in a cash game w/ a small PP. I'd just wait for another hand. (This isn't a tournament situation)
#3 At best you were in a coin flip situation. No one will re-raise with something like suited-conectors or a pair smaller than 7's. Moreover, someone wouldn't call a re-raise with those hands.
#4 At worst you were beat by a higher pair and are facing a 2 outter situation.
So, I would have probably folded. You got lucky, so it worked out, but I wouldn't do that again. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
NobAzn Four of a Kind
Joined: 28 Dec 2005 Posts: 294 Location: Monterey Park, CA
|
Posted: Wed Apr 05, 2006 8:00 pm Post subject: Re: Critique this B&M hand |
|
|
| NobAzn wrote: |
| Yesterday, playing a 1-3NL game. I'm on right of the dealer button with about $85, 5 players limp in and I look down at 77 so I raise it to $12, dealers calls, SB calls then BB raises to $27, then the surprising thing is all but one limper called so, it is $15 more chips for me to call, and I assume everyone has each others outs so I push all in and get 4 callers. |
People stop saying I limped into the hand. I was the first raiser, then got reraised. The only reason I pushed all in is because of the amount of callers for the second reraise. The only reason I raised in the first place is because of all the limpers. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Guest
|
Posted: Wed Apr 05, 2006 10:26 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I didn't say you limped... read my first post
...The BB has seen 5 limpers plus a raiser (you) and STILL reraises the pot...
I still stand by what I said in my earlier post. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Methebee Guest
|
Posted: Thu Apr 06, 2006 11:55 am Post subject: |
|
|
| I wouldn't raise pre-flop. No real point to it. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
NobAzn Four of a Kind
Joined: 28 Dec 2005 Posts: 294 Location: Monterey Park, CA
|
Posted: Thu Apr 06, 2006 5:06 pm Post subject: Re: |
|
|
| Methebee wrote: |
| I wouldn't raise pre-flop. No real point to it. |
Please elaborate on your answer |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|