|
| Author |
Message |
nilgiri Message Board Junkie
Joined: 11 Jan 2007 Posts: 1367 Location: New Hampshire
|
Posted: Mon Jun 02, 2008 4:14 pm Post subject: 9-man SnG line check |
|
|
Line check on Hand #2? (UTG+1 is MP in Hand #1.)
------------------
HAND #1
------------------
Full Tilt Poker, $100 + $9 NL Hold'em Sit n' Go, 40/80 Blinds, 7 Players
LeggoPoker.com - Hand History Converter
Hero (UTG): 1,575
UTG+1: 1,735
MP: 2,665
CO: 3,710
BTN: 1,645
SB: 1,600
BB: 570
Pre-Flop: (120) 5 6 dealt to Hero (UTG)
Hero folds, UTG+1 calls 80, MP raises to 160, 4 folds, UTG+1 calls 80
Flop: (440) 4 A 2 (2 Players)
UTG+1 bets 240, MP raises to 480, UTG+1 raises to 720, MP raises to 2,505 and is All-In, UTG+1 calls 855 and is All-In
Turn: (3,590) Q (2 Players - 1 is All-In)
River: (3,590) 7 (2 Players - 1 is All-In)
Results: 3,590 Pot
UTG+1 showed 4 4 (three of a kind, Fours) and WON 3,590 (+1,855 NET)
MP showed A K (a pair of Aces) and LOST (-1,735 NET)
------------------
HAND #2
------------------
Full Tilt Poker, $100 + $9 NL Hold'em Sit n' Go, 40/80 Blinds, 7 Players
LeggoPoker.com - Hand History Converter
Hero (BB): 1,575
UTG: 3,590
UTG+1: 930
MP: 3,710
CO: 1,645
BTN: 1,560
SB: 490
Pre-Flop: (120) Q J dealt to Hero (BB)
UTG folds, UTG+1 raises to 160, 4 folds, Hero raises to 1,575 and is All-In
Last edited by nilgiri on Tue Jun 03, 2008 10:49 am; edited 1 time in total |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Starvingwriter Full House
Joined: 03 May 2008 Posts: 174
|
Posted: Mon Jun 02, 2008 6:22 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Edit: I was indeed confused about which player you were shoving against, so my post was pretty much meaningless.
Most people, even short stacked, will shove with any pair, any ace, or any king, all of which have you in trouble. I guess the min-raise could be an attempt to sneak in with something like suited connectors, but most likely, I'm guessing he has A/x, K/x, or a pair, and is looking to shove, but figures an outright shove would scare off anyone that would have to put in 1/3 of their stack to look him up.
Last edited by Starvingwriter on Mon Jun 02, 2008 9:40 pm; edited 1 time in total |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Honest_Rob Postmaster General
Joined: 21 Jul 2005 Posts: 5661 Location: trying to get back to even
|
Posted: Mon Jun 02, 2008 6:41 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Fold. Last time he min. raised he had AK. Why shove? |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
nilgiri Message Board Junkie
Joined: 11 Jan 2007 Posts: 1367 Location: New Hampshire
|
Posted: Mon Jun 02, 2008 7:36 pm Post subject: |
|
|
So here was my line of thinking:
An extremely common play after losing a big pot and ending up shortstacked is to shove the next hand if you are dealt something good. This happens all the time, because players think they will be called lighter by players who think they are tilting. (And they are correct, they do get called lighter.)
Another extremely common play after losing a big pot and ending up shortstacked is to raise anything that seems remotely good (i.e. tilt).
If he has a great hand, why is he only minraising here instead of shoving? It doesn't make any sense to me. It looks much more like he is raising because he is tilting a bit.
He also still has plenty of chips behind him, and by the time it gets to me he has had time to think about whether he really wants to get all in with whatever he is holding, especially after I just saw him do exactly the same thing with AKs, but I pushed all in anyway.
Even if he has a mid/low pair or A-rag, I'm not that far behind if he can't let go of it.
This is why I need a line check. I don't know if I'm crazy, or if this makes sense. Right now it seems like the needle is swinging in the crazy direction... |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Honest_Rob Postmaster General
Joined: 21 Jul 2005 Posts: 5661 Location: trying to get back to even
|
Posted: Mon Jun 02, 2008 8:31 pm Post subject: |
|
|
If you really think he is raising a big range here because he is a little on tilt then why not just call and reevaluate on the flop? A whole bunch of his "tilt" raising hands are beating you here. Really almost all of them and if he is tilty he's a lot more likely to call and be correct to do so. Obv that's very bad for you.
What's his "tilt" range here? Something like: 22+, Ax, Kxs, any two facecards etc. Pretty much that whole range is ahead of you. I think you'll make much more in the longrun in a spot like this(assuming you are correct that he is tilty here) by calling and value betting the **** out of him when he catches a little something and feels like he's being picked on and can't let it go. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
dcdoorknob Royal Flush
Joined: 11 May 2007 Posts: 921 Location: Mississippi
|
Posted: Tue Jun 03, 2008 1:14 am Post subject: |
|
|
I think you are way over-thinking this. Fold equity seems pretty minimal (I would expect the guy to call fairly wide here, weather he's tilting or not), and with such knowledge QJo is just not nearly strong enough to make this move.
Also, you say 6 max in the title, but why do I count 7 people then? |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
live4freerolls Message Board Junkie
Joined: 23 Nov 2006 Posts: 2179 Location: Running good.
|
Posted: Tue Jun 03, 2008 1:17 am Post subject: |
|
|
| Folding > Calling > Raising > Shoving. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
nilgiri Message Board Junkie
Joined: 11 Jan 2007 Posts: 1367 Location: New Hampshire
|
Posted: Tue Jun 03, 2008 10:57 am Post subject: |
|
|
| Honest_Rob wrote: |
| I think you'll make much more in the longrun in a spot like this(assuming you are correct that he is tilty here) by calling and value betting the **** out of him when he catches a little something and feels like he's being picked on and can't let it go. |
Yeah, this sounds much better. I didn't really want to call because I was OOP. I hadn't thought a whole lot about how much FE I had.
| dcdoorknob wrote: |
| Also, you say 6 max in the title, but why do I count 7 people then? |
Whoops, thanks, nice catch. I was playing a 6-person and a 9-person at the same time... |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|
Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group
|
|