Online Poker Room
Our Poker Players
Texas Hold Em Download
How To Play Poker
Full Tilt Poker
Real Money Poker Games
News & Promotions
Poker Store
Online Poker Affiliates
Full Tilt Poker
Online Poker Forum at Full Tilt Poker
  FAQFAQ   SearchSearch    RegisterRegister   ProfileProfile  Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages  Log inLog in 

Online Poker Forum - KK UTG (line check)
Goto page Previous  1, 2
 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Online Poker Forum Home -> No Limit/Pot Limit Strategy Discussion
Author Message
HuJwang
Forum Blight


Joined: 20 Aug 2006
Posts: 6018
Location: Halifax, NS

PostPosted: Sun May 18, 2008 11:07 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

bdbranch wrote:

Ummm. Interesting that when stupid people can't find anything constructive to play, they resort to childish flaming as their argument.


Same to you except replace "childish flaming" with "calling whatever is written in the other guy's post 'childish flaming'".
Back to top
Riddim
Moderator


Joined: 04 Dec 2005
Posts: 7705
Location: Quitting smoking

PostPosted: Sun May 18, 2008 11:18 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Peepers_au wrote:
GoldenDomer9 wrote:
I'm fine with it, personally. You'll be beat by some 9 10's, A9's or J10's sometimes, but you'll also be up against a weak-tight non believer with AJ and KJ too.


JT doesn't beat him. That gives the villain JJ99 to Rob's KK99.

While it's a fairly outside chance, QcTc is surely in the villain's range here.


My guess is that he simply got JT and QT mixed up. Also, all the QT combos are possible.
Back to top
bdbranch
Banned


Joined: 13 Mar 2008
Posts: 503
Location: At home wdyt. Btw. I'm not opinionated all the time, umm can you be opinionated when you're asleep

PostPosted: Fri May 23, 2008 3:29 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

HuJwang wrote:
bdbranch wrote:

Ummm. Interesting that when stupid people can't find anything constructive to play, they resort to childish flaming as their argument.

Same to you except replace "childish flaming" with "calling whatever is written in the other guy's post 'childish flaming'".

I guess that it's now true because I'm quoting you.
HuJwang to dumwaldo wrote:
You've got a lot of hate in you, huh.

HuJwang to markljackson wrote:

Let me guess: you supported Bush.

HuJwang wrote:
dumwaldo wrote:
Why are you are incapable of discussing something without making personal attacks?
I suppose a better question might be why do moderators on this forum allow you to do it when you are doing it so frequently?

I know, I know, nobody likes to be called a Bush supporter. But the way he was talking about the "big bad elitist intellectuals" really reminded me of them.

HuJwang to drtre1987 wrote:

Yeah, well your mom isn't cutting it.

HuJwang wrote:
bdbranch wrote:
Oh lets not have any laws because there's a 'possibilty' that someone may be wrongly convicted.
Oh lets not have any laws because some people 50 years ago were wrongly convicted.
Oh lets just throw open the prison doors and let all those 'poor' 'misunderstood' creatures free.

Oh by the way, do let us all know so that we can give them a nice warm welcome as they leave the prison gates.

You are dumb.

HuJwang wrote:
Ok this is getting nowhere. You're basically ignoring what I said and repeating the same stuff over and ove. I'm done here.

Just a tiny sample of what I'm talking about. Btw, it's not exclusively HuJwang but HuJwang is clearly the major contributor
Back to top
esperz
Full House


Joined: 10 Apr 2008
Posts: 220

PostPosted: Fri May 23, 2008 10:08 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Seemed standard. You can't ever fold in fear of a set. You really can't.

You played well CD, you just got f***ked.
Back to top
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Online Poker Forum Home -> No Limit/Pot Limit Strategy Discussion All times are GMT - 4 Hours
Goto page Previous  1, 2
Page 2 of 2

 


Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group