Online Poker Room
Our Poker Players
Texas Hold Em Download
How To Play Poker
Full Tilt Poker
Real Money Poker Games
News & Promotions
Poker Store
Online Poker Affiliates
Full Tilt Poker
Online Poker Forum at Full Tilt Poker
  FAQFAQ   SearchSearch    RegisterRegister   ProfileProfile  Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages  Log inLog in 

Online Poker Forum - Trickier Starting Hand: AK or JJ?
Goto page 1, 2  Next
 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Online Poker Forum Home -> No Limit/Pot Limit Strategy Discussion

What Starting Hand Causes you More Problems?
A-K offsuit
33%
 33%  [ 7 ]
J-J
66%
 66%  [ 14 ]
Total Votes : 21

Author Message
skeeter1114
Message Board Junkie


Joined: 28 Feb 2007
Posts: 1671

PostPosted: Fri May 02, 2008 12:51 pm    Post subject: Trickier Starting Hand: AK or JJ? Reply with quote

I know some people have said they find A-K very difficult to play. Others think the same is true for J-J. So, I was curious to see what people think is the trickier starting hand.

For me personally, it's A-K. With J-J, I can usually get away from this hand pre-flop if it goes to a 3rd raise from a someone who hasn't been a maniac. I also look at it that JJ can only be beaten by 3 hands, and only 3 others would it be in a race with. With A-K, there are only 2 hands that put AK into deep trouble.

I also keep going back and forth on AK. Because it's only dominated by 2 hands, it is a premium hand. However, it is not a pair, and any pair 2-2 through Q-Q also beat it. Whereas J-J, only 3 hands can beat it. I think many people, as well as me, can overplay A-K pre-flop, especially to a re-raise. Probably because 80% of the time, you're in a race, 15% of the time you have your opponent dominated, and 5% you're dominated. My numbers may be off there but I'm just trying to explain my thinking of why I struggle with A-K. If anyone has advice how to best play either of these hands, I would appreciate it. Thanks.
Back to top
Honest_Rob
Postmaster General


Joined: 21 Jul 2005
Posts: 4997
Location: trying to get back to even

PostPosted: Fri May 02, 2008 2:02 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

I'd say JJ is trickier. With AK if you miss the flop it's pretty easy to get away from it. With JJ so many times the flop will come all undercards or one over/two unders and it's trickier to access where you are. When it comes to 3-bet and 4-bet spots preflop they're both pretty tricky but really so is any hand except AA/KK.
Back to top
Riddim
Moderator


Joined: 04 Dec 2005
Posts: 6440
Location: Quitting smoking

PostPosted: Fri May 02, 2008 2:49 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Well, AK is usually the nuts PF and postflop as well as long as you spike a pair so I'll have to go with JJ.
Back to top
kcstoltz
Four of a Kind


Joined: 27 Jun 2007
Posts: 252

PostPosted: Fri May 02, 2008 3:13 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

i vote AK offsuite the only reason being is that i lost more with that than a pair of jj
Back to top
HuJwang
Forum Blight


Joined: 20 Aug 2006
Posts: 5340
Location: Halifax, NS

PostPosted: Fri May 02, 2008 4:44 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

kcstoltz wrote:
i vote AK offsuite the only reason being is that i lost more with that than a pair of jj


I don't know if I've ever lost with four Jacks.
Back to top
bdbranch
Banned


Joined: 13 Mar 2008
Posts: 503
Location: At home wdyt. Btw. I'm not opinionated all the time, umm can you be opinionated when you're asleep

PostPosted: Fri May 02, 2008 9:56 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Personally, I find that it's easier to walk away from AK. But you play JJ differently to AK anyway. Personally with JJ, I want to get rid of as many people as possible. With AK I want people in the pot (not including garbage like 85) incase it hits.
Back to top
bdbranch
Banned


Joined: 13 Mar 2008
Posts: 503
Location: At home wdyt. Btw. I'm not opinionated all the time, umm can you be opinionated when you're asleep

PostPosted: Fri May 02, 2008 10:11 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Riddim wrote:
Well, AK is usually the nuts PF and postflop as well as long as you spike a pair so I'll have to go with JJ.


AK is hardly the nuts preflop. Even 22 will still be ahead of AK 70% of the time postflop (and no that's not a recommendation for 22). The only thing that AK has is good potential.
Back to top
bdbranch
Banned


Joined: 13 Mar 2008
Posts: 503
Location: At home wdyt. Btw. I'm not opinionated all the time, umm can you be opinionated when you're asleep

PostPosted: Fri May 02, 2008 10:15 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

HuJwang wrote:
kcstoltz wrote:
i vote AK offsuite the only reason being is that i lost more with that than a pair of jj


I don't know if I've ever lost with four Jacks.


I don't have the exact odds of getting quads, but I'm sure that it's less than 1% so that's a silly statement.
Back to top
Totes2Techs
Full House


Joined: 18 Jan 2008
Posts: 188

PostPosted: Fri May 02, 2008 10:40 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

bdbranch wrote:
HuJwang wrote:
kcstoltz wrote:
i vote AK offsuite the only reason being is that i lost more with that than a pair of jj


I don't know if I've ever lost with four Jacks.


I don't have the exact odds of getting quads, but I'm sure that it's less than 1% so that's a silly statement.


The first Red part, along with the 2nd Red part is a joke Branch. Notice the first Red part as written by someone else, says "a PAIR of JJ" or a pair of a pair.......why? That's funny!
Back to top
Totes2Techs
Full House


Joined: 18 Jan 2008
Posts: 188

PostPosted: Fri May 02, 2008 10:51 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

As far as the OP, I don't know if JJ is harder or not, but I don't like them as much because they are a made hand PF and easier to feel attached to. If you raise with them PF, any callers you may get most likely hold a pair or something with A's or paint. It's trickier to play JJ post flop because you really never have a solid idea of where you stand once the flop hits. Any A, K or Q and any unders could have made your opponent an over pair or set. I have a difficult time sticking with them if I've gotten raised OTF or OTT.
Back to top
nefl1
Two Pair


Joined: 14 Feb 2008
Posts: 63
Location: Jax Beach FLA

PostPosted: Fri May 02, 2008 10:59 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

There is a reason AK is called walking back to texas. I have made
alot of money with JJ and gone bust with AKo more times than I
care to mention . Ill dump my JJ on a nasty board .
Back to top
drtre1987
Message Board Junkie


Joined: 07 Nov 2006
Posts: 1759

PostPosted: Sat May 03, 2008 12:51 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

bdbranch wrote:
Riddim wrote:
Well, AK is usually the nuts PF and postflop as well as long as you spike a pair so I'll have to go with JJ.


AK is hardly the nuts preflop. Even 22 will still be ahead of AK 70% of the time postflop (and no that's not a recommendation for 22). The only thing that AK has is good potential.


Sad Of course AK is never the nuts preflop. But it will harldy ever be that big of a dog against any hand. It is a coin flip or a favorite over any pair or unpaired hand under AA and KK. It is only a coin flip or better against hands other than KK/AA (which is unlikely since you have an A and K), which will always be +EV with all of the dead money in the pot. Unless you are up against a nit preflop, you will always have the best of it getting it in preflop against their range.
Back to top
bdbranch
Banned


Joined: 13 Mar 2008
Posts: 503
Location: At home wdyt. Btw. I'm not opinionated all the time, umm can you be opinionated when you're asleep

PostPosted: Sat May 03, 2008 12:55 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Totes2Techs wrote:
bdbranch wrote:
HuJwang wrote:
kcstoltz wrote:
i vote AK offsuite the only reason being is that i lost more with that than a pair of jj


I don't know if I've ever lost with four Jacks.


I don't have the exact odds of getting quads, but I'm sure that it's less than 1% so that's a silly statement.


The first Red part, along with the 2nd Red part is a joke Branch. Notice the first Red part as written by someone else, says "a PAIR of JJ" or a pair of a pair.......why? That's funny!


Don't know about the first bit. The second bit is a joke. After rereading it, yes it's amusing.
Back to top
Riddim
Moderator


Joined: 04 Dec 2005
Posts: 6440
Location: Quitting smoking

PostPosted: Sat May 03, 2008 1:13 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

bdbranch wrote:
Riddim wrote:
Well, AK is usually the nuts PF and postflop as well as long as you spike a pair so I'll have to go with JJ.


AK is hardly the nuts preflop. Even 22 will still be ahead of AK 70% of the time postflop (and no that's not a recommendation for 22). The only thing that AK has is good potential.


The nuts as in I'm getting as much money in with it pre-flop as I can, although I guess I should've added that it's no longer true when the stacks become significantly deeper than 100 BBs. AK has way more than just potential. It's a big favorite against any unpaired hand and crushes all other good unpaired hands while only being a big underdog against two hands. In addition, us having an ace and a king cuts the possible combinations of AA and KK left in the deck in half.

In a game that's aggressive pre-flop the best way to play it will usually be to just get it in. Not only is it profitable on its own, but it wides the range of hands with which we get all-in pre-flop by quite a bit, making it easier to get action on other big hands. When it comes to getting it in PF, AK is the 4th strongest hand in the deck vs. at least most reasonable ranges.
Back to top
skeeter1114
Message Board Junkie


Joined: 28 Feb 2007
Posts: 1671

PostPosted: Sat May 03, 2008 1:23 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Ok, let me pose this scenario, which maybe was what I was trying to get at.

First hand of a SNG/MTT

Full Tilt Poker Game #123456789: Table 1 - 15/30- No Limit Hold'em - 00:00:01 ET - 2008/05/03
Seat 1: Fred (1,500)
Seat 2: Wilma (1,500)
Seat 3: Barney (1,500)
Seat 4: Betty (1,500)
Seat 5: Pebbles (1,500)
Seat 6: Bam-Bam (1,500)
Seat 7: Dino (1,500)
Seat 8: Mr. Slate (1,500)
Seat 9: The Great Gazoo (1,500)
Fred posts the small blind of 15
Wilma posts the big blind of 30
The button is in seat #9
*** HOLE CARDS ***
Dealt to Barney [??]
Barney raises to 90
Betty folds
Pebbles folds
Bam-Bam folds
Dino raises to 300
Mr. Slate folds
The Great Gazoo folds
Fred folds
Wilma folds
Barney ??

How do you proceed here with
A.) A-K
B.) J-J

This is the situation I refer to as being a tough one. My first instinct here is to shove all-in, especially at the low limits (all that I play). But, should I be willing to race in this situation every time or fold to my 90 chips and wait for a better spot. Do you play one hand differently than the other, and if so, why?
Back to top
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Online Poker Forum Home -> No Limit/Pot Limit Strategy Discussion All times are GMT - 4 Hours
Goto page 1, 2  Next
Page 1 of 2

 


Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group