|
| Author |
Message |
FlopDog7 Full House
Joined: 07 Oct 2007 Posts: 209 Location: Poker Heaven
|
Posted: Sun Mar 30, 2008 6:47 pm Post subject: Re: What level does reasonable skill prevail? |
|
|
| fiddlepuck wrote: |
| Funny I can do well in 1/2, but get my ass kicked at 5c/10c. |
LOL!
Simple explanation- The vast majority of players at .05/.10 are total LAG suck-out donkeys with no clue how to play poker, and no desire to ever play any better.
Every raise is a challenge to their manhood, and every check is an invitation to go all-in w 74 offsuit.
I invented a term for their style: Slot Machine Poker- you puts in yer money and you pulls the handle.
Last edited by FlopDog7 on Mon Mar 31, 2008 7:04 am; edited 1 time in total |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
mistaken69 Message Board Junkie
Joined: 06 Sep 2005 Posts: 1566 Location: taking up smoking
|
Posted: Sun Mar 30, 2008 11:25 pm Post subject: Re: What level does reasonable skill prevail? |
|
|
| FlopDog7 wrote: |
| fiddlepuck wrote: |
| Funny I can do well in 1/2, but get my ass kicked at 5c/10c. |
LOL!
Simple explanation- The vast majority of players at .05/.10 are total LAG suck-out donkey dicks with no clue how to play poker, and no desire to ever play any better.
Every raise is a challenge to their manhood, and every check is an invitation to go all-in w 74 offsuit.
I invented a term for their style: Slot Machine Poker- you puts in yer money and you pulls the handle. |
yeah, 'cause 1/2 live games play so well. you're a **** idiot. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
FlopDog7 Full House
Joined: 07 Oct 2007 Posts: 209 Location: Poker Heaven
|
Posted: Mon Mar 31, 2008 7:03 am Post subject: Re: What level does reasonable skill prevail? |
|
|
| mistaken69 wrote: |
| yeah, 'cause 1/2 live games play so well. you're a **** idiot. |
Well, yes Mistaken69, I do not think I am mistaken.
Based on my own experience, I generally the level of play and experience of the players at 1/2 is much better than at .05/.10, and I'm sure many would agree with me.
If your experience has been different, that's ok with me. And if you disagree, try making an argument, instead of calling some names. That is the weakest argument someone can make. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
drtre1987 Message Board Junkie
Joined: 07 Nov 2006 Posts: 1919
|
Posted: Mon Mar 31, 2008 10:50 am Post subject: Re: What level does reasonable skill prevail? |
|
|
| FlopDog7 wrote: |
Well, yes Mistaken69, I do not think I am mistaken.
|
Can I request that no one ever use this horrible pun again when talking to mistaken69? |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
FlopDog7 Full House
Joined: 07 Oct 2007 Posts: 209 Location: Poker Heaven
|
Posted: Mon Mar 31, 2008 4:05 pm Post subject: Re: What level does reasonable skill prevail? |
|
|
| drtre1987 wrote: |
| FlopDog7 wrote: |
Well, yes Mistaken69, I do not think I am mistaken.
|
Can I request that no one ever use this horrible pun again when talking to mistaken69? |
lol.
I haven't said anything that funny since oh, 1987... I told my dad a joke, and he said, "That was really a flop, dog." |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
griffinlord Message Board Junkie
Joined: 20 Jul 2005 Posts: 2454 Location: The Great Plains of South Dakota
|
Posted: Mon Mar 31, 2008 4:35 pm Post subject: Re: What level does reasonable skill prevail? |
|
|
| fiddlepuck wrote: |
So the question is this, how far do I have to move up in limits to not see this BS? |
Sigh, you've asked two completely different questions.
The answer to the first, in the title of this thread, is that reasonable skill prevails at all levels. The higher the level the more skill you will need, but if you are more skilled than your opponents you are +EV in the game.
In answer to your second question, quoted, you will see less and less of it as you move up, but it never, ever goes away completely. And as long as your skill level is higher than that of your opponents and you have a sufficiently large bankroll you should be okay with it.
The more random your opponents the greater your EV. But that tends to come at a cost of increased variance.
Imagine a heads up match in which every time you are dealt AA your opponent gets 72o. If you bet and he folds you always win his blind and have an EV of +1bb (assuming he is alway on the bb when this happens) with absolutely no variance.
But lets say that instead if you bet 3.5bb with AA your opponent will always call with 72o. Naturally you are celebrating because your EV has gone from +1bb to about +3.3bb, which is really good.
But notice that you don't have a +3.5bb EV. This is because 72o will crack AA every so often--I think it is about 10% of the time. So all of a sudden you've added variance to your win rate.
Are you honestly going to get ticked off because villain made a negative EV play and got lucky? You shouldn't. You should be thrilled to see money go in there.
What you need to do is recognize two things:
1. Variance is your friend. Every time someone wins with a piece of crap hand they are more likely to play the same way again increasing your EV every time they do so. Sure they'll get lucky sometimes, but that just keeps them coming back for more.
2. You must learn how the villain plays so that post-flop you can either extract extra money from him or get away from a hand when he catches a lucky flop. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
jchill99 High Card
Joined: 01 Apr 2008 Posts: 2
|
Posted: Tue Apr 01, 2008 2:00 am Post subject: FLush Draw |
|
|
The first hand, with bottom two pair this was an agressive move, and overplayed in the beginning because you were drawing dead against an improbable set of tens. Even though he didnt have the tens, you had to figure he had at least the FD and two overs, and maybe the FD with a ten and an over, and it that case you are barely a favorite. I would have bet aggressively to start, and then slowed down, and let one card come off before proceeding.....it depends on evaluation of the player, but you kinda got lucky calling and him having the fd and two overs, as that is the worst hand he could have had that he was representing.....
This aggressive play happens at all levels, but I do agree that play is more conservative in live games, due to the embarassment factor of showing down an inferior hand. I play regularly at Foxwoods and Mohegan Sun and it is rare to see some of the moves that happen frequently on here, but it is also rare that someone would want to show the table a weak hand, when it is not as easy to switch to another table. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
mistaken69 Message Board Junkie
Joined: 06 Sep 2005 Posts: 1566 Location: taking up smoking
|
Posted: Tue Apr 01, 2008 1:43 pm Post subject: Re: What level does reasonable skill prevail? |
|
|
| FlopDog7 wrote: |
| mistaken69 wrote: |
| yeah, 'cause 1/2 live games play so well. you're a **** idiot. |
Well, yes Mistaken69, I do not think I am mistaken.
Based on my own experience, I generally the level of play and experience of the players at 1/2 is much better than at .05/.10, and I'm sure many would agree with me.
If your experience has been different, that's ok with me. And if you disagree, try making an argument, instead of calling some names. That is the weakest argument someone can make. |
you're just as **** stupid. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
fiddlepuck Three of a Kind
Joined: 03 Sep 2007 Posts: 78 Location: Victoria, BC, Canada
|
Posted: Mon May 19, 2008 9:11 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Well, Ive moved up in stakes, and I no longer whine. Cause the **** that was pisisng me off, just doenst happen anymore............ Maybe once every couple sessions............ So now when I get a badbeat, I shrug it off, casue it aint the 17th time that day! haha. Now I feel I can actualy try and learn the game and see results..... (which I am.... Im seeing a much larger profit in the weeks Ive moved up beyond 10c25c, than I ever did lower than that. There really seems to be a defined line betwen 10c 25c, and 25c 50c. I can sit in 25NL all day, and likely lose $10. while in the 50nl im gennerally profitting. Im even getting away form AA Vs KK, (me:KK) casue the other player is playing from a thinking point of view too. its fun again this game!!!!! |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
fiddlepuck Three of a Kind
Joined: 03 Sep 2007 Posts: 78 Location: Victoria, BC, Canada
|
Posted: Mon May 19, 2008 9:11 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Well, Ive moved up in stakes, and I no longer whine. Cause the **** that was pisisng me off, just doenst happen anymore............ Maybe once every couple sessions............ So now when I get a badbeat, I shrug it off, casue it aint the 17th time that day! haha. Now I feel I can actualy try and learn the game and see results..... (which I am.... Im seeing a much larger profit in the weeks Ive moved up beyond 10c25c, than I ever did lower than that. There really seems to be a defined line betwen 10c 25c, and 25c 50c. I can sit in 25NL all day, and likely lose $10. while in the 50nl im gennerally profitting. Im even getting away form AA Vs KK, (me:KK) casue the other player is playing from a thinking point of view too. its fun again this game!!!!! |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
fiddlepuck Three of a Kind
Joined: 03 Sep 2007 Posts: 78 Location: Victoria, BC, Canada
|
Posted: Mon May 19, 2008 9:12 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Well, Ive moved up in stakes, and I no longer whine. Cause the **** that was pisisng me off, just doenst happen anymore............ Maybe once every couple sessions............ So now when I get a badbeat, I shrug it off, casue it aint the 17th time that day! haha. Now I feel I can actualy try and learn the game and see results..... (which I am.... Im seeing a much larger profit in the weeks Ive moved up beyond 10c25c, than I ever did lower than that. There really seems to be a defined line betwen 10c 25c, and 25c 50c. I can sit in 25NL all day, and likely lose $10. while in the 50nl im gennerally profitting. Im even getting away form AA Vs KK, (me:KK) casue the other player is playing from a thinking point of view too. its fun again this game!!!!! |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Flying_Kiwi Message Board Junkie
Joined: 03 Sep 2006 Posts: 5578 Location: Popping bubbles
|
Posted: Mon May 19, 2008 9:26 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| x3 |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
esperz Full House
Joined: 10 Apr 2008 Posts: 220
|
Posted: Tue May 20, 2008 12:57 am Post subject: |
|
|
| X1 |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Starvingwriter Full House
Joined: 03 May 2008 Posts: 174
|
Posted: Tue May 20, 2008 2:29 am Post subject: |
|
|
This is the best post ever.
Look. Every single genuine bad beat you take means you outplayed the other player, it just didn't happen to pay out this time. If you continue to make the same play again and again, you will make money. So, when someone chases or calls with the wrong odds, you should be grinning, not complaining.
The fish never go away in my experience. As I've moved from $2 single table SnGs up to $10 and $20, my play has actually had to tighten significantly because a lot of players at those levels are even more likely to not lay down a hand when you represent a strong hand or give them poor odds.
In my experience, low limit six handed tables usually break down like this:
1-3 solid players
1-2 okay players that just don't quite "have it" yet
2-4 total fish
The only difference as you move up is that the fish get bigger, and the solid players get stronger. Heck, at those levels, the entire opening game is mostly "who can catch the fish the fastest without ending up all wet." It's just part of the game. Looks to me from the hands you posted that your starting hand requirements vs. fish are ridiculous, so you end up all wet more often than not.
Every single time someone calls a huge overbet chasing a flush draw, you're going to get paid three times more often than you're going to lose.
As has already been pointed out, players with inferior skill are the reason to play poker. If you want to play against Phil Ivey, Phil Hellmuth, Chris Furgeson, and whoever else, be my guest.
My first guess is that you'll lose all your money in a big hurry.
My second guess is that if you don't, they'll go back to their own personal forums complaining about the donk that would play with anything, just like you did here. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|
Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group
|
|