Online Poker Forum - regarding forum Pros, junkies whatever!!!

FOLD101 · Two Pair Joined: 17 May 2007 Posts: 69

This based off the post created by California Champ"Fulltilt software is extremely flawed, serious post!!!"

On this post ALONE ,there where 265 total posts.

the following is and account of who posted and why they rank as far as the number of posted responses.

I think you will see just how some of these folks got their rank in these forums!!!

Relaxedriley- 1 post
Hujwang-2 posts
Apolloswanson- 5 posts
Evilgenius- 1 post
Californiachamp- 4 posts(coinsidently may be why he gave up on the post)
2highflush-20 posts
junk button-2 posts
IABoomer-23 posts
Boynamedsue-3 posts
remoth-1 post
bogey5800- 1 post
Dumwaldo-2 posts
Live4freerolls-2 posts
nathanthomp-1 post
OpDS311-1 post
Eight Eighteen- 2 posts
Browndog23-1 post
Browndog23-1 post
Pressure Pete- 1post
Hengi22-1 post
Deadmoney314-6 posts
Sirch1-6 posts
Pouty pants-1 post
Denester- 1post
StakeMonster- 1post
Griffinlord-6 posts
Death2Eeyor-2 posts
CitizenCain- 3 posts
Hektar- 2 posts
Dannyboya- 1 post
Pete D - 1post
Lord Bodak- 2 posts
Jason Yates-2 posts
Strasse- 2 posts
Muskego Mike-4 posts
NYDOLL-1 post
Boxerpit77-1 post
Smokey064-1 post
ches-1 post
xRocko-1 post
hungryfisherman-1 post
KGBlovesOreos-1 post
drkato-3 ostsbmg5db-1 post
mcai-9 posts
TheImortalO-1 post
Mychcumstien-1 post
Amgrover-1 post
geo617- 7 posts
Bowfinger- 2 posts
BnRocks- 2posts
Maniladog-6 posts
TRSH-1 post
Bi lintia 06-2 posts
BennyBowler-1 post
ZiaMcCabe-1 post
KYblue007-2 posts
Markljackson-7 posts
DolphinsLady-1post
Donnyz89-1 post
Ambitious207-1 post
FourTweSech-1 post
RFTB-2 posts
CaptainBaldy-1 post
2pumpchump-1 post
sloshedzues-1 post
BBCoach44-2 posts
Comrad-1 post
Sandgroper-1 post
Igethard4doe-1 post
ThevelvetFog-1 posts
Gontronix-1 post
LuckyBub-1 post
FlushMutt-14 posts
Adelaidecrows02-2 posts
Flying Kiwi-1 post
CubsFan2007-1 post
Codenamedtoad-1post
xyberman-1 post
FrankJones-1 post
Juslucknoskills-1 post
Cudgell-2 posts
Fast Eddie 88-2 post
Spike420211-2 posts
16710Pepsi-1 post
USFDoh-1post
Willc78-1post
Bogiegolf50-12 posts
wwcd5215-4 posts
Klump1- 1post
Royaltenenbaum-1 post
Jamesgodfrey-1 post
Mark Greb- 2posts
Roxylea-4 posts
Kronx- 1 post
Lost Ostrich-1 post
FOLD101-ME-1 post

Your probably wondering WHAT THE F&&K???

Why did you do this??

The whole point was to just show who posts and just how often, giving them the status and/or rank on this forum they have!

If you look at the topic of the forum this info was taken from, and then you read all the comments in that topic, you will see WHY NAMES like,

IA Boomer, and 2 highFlush are ranked as moderater,and/ forum PROS.

THEY LIKE TO ARGUE WITH PEOPLE AND THATS THE FACTS!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

THEY DONT DO ANY GOOD HERE,THERE A WASTE OF SPACE ON THIS FORUM.

THEY SIT HERE DAY AFTER DAY AND TRY TO DEBUNK PEOPLES THEORIES ON WEATHER THIS SITE IS CORRUPT OR NOT!

THEY RARELY OFFER ANY ITELLIGENT FEEDBACK(CONTINUALLY STATING THAT THERE POKER TRACKING SOFTWARE SAY OTHERWISE!)

and for this EMENCE ABILITY TO ARGUE WITH PEOPLE they have gained the status as Moderater or Forum Pro or WHATEVER THE HECK YOU WANT TO CALL IT FULLTILT?

YET, as a site you still put up with it? why????

THIS IS JUST 1 TOPIC,THERE ARE THOUSANDS JUST LIKE IT!!!!!

THESE PEOPLE YOU CALL PROS OR WHATEVER YOU WANT TO CALL IT ARE JUST JERKS!!!!!!

JERKS WITH NOTHING BETTER TO DO THEN ARGUE WITH PEOPLE.DAY IN , DAY OUT!!!!!!!!!

I CALL IT LIKE I SEE IT!

PUT THIS IN YOUR POKER TRACKER AND SMOKE IT!!!!!!
Very Happy

FOLD101 · Two Pair Joined: 17 May 2007 Posts: 69

OH,and coinsidentally, there about 13,375 people who looked at this post topic.

Do you REALLY THINK THIS IS A GOOD WAY TO ADVERTISE THE SITE???

MAYBE,just maybe if these people who have this status had that taken from them, this site would gain something from it.

AH,I DONO JUST A THEORY???

the thought of these forums is supposed to be a place where people can come and discuss things!!! not sit like 3rd graders and fight over rediculous crap!

if its rigged, talk about it!

if its not rigged talk about it, but dont reward people for argueing by giving them status here.

HEY!! SEEMS THAT WOULD BE THE JOB OF THE MODERATER,RIGHT????

oh THATS RIGHT HES JUST PART OF THE PROBLEM!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

clamper13 · Posted: Thu Dec 13, 2007 3:43 pm Post subject:

Add me to the list for any future rancor/acrimony theory about how the forum regulars go out of their way to rankle others who don't check their spelling, or can't find a way to express themselves without overuse of the caps lock button.

Zophar · Posted: Thu Dec 13, 2007 4:20 pm Post subject:

Ban.

First page even.

IABoomer · Moderator Joined: 29 Oct 2006 Posts: 8190

Sorry, Forum. I apparently urinated on FOLD101's corn flakes this morning and he felt compelled to start yet another thread. Embarassed

Just a friendly suggestion, FOLD, and you can take it or leave it, but it would have been nice of you to put those name/post counts into something like Excel, sort it by post count, then copy and paste it. That way, the pattern you're trying to show would stand out better.

The forum exists for discussion. People present one side of a discussion. Other people present another side. Posts go back and forth as the discussion progresses. Sometimes, an agreement is reached and the thread dies out. Other times, people can't reach an agreement and argue ad infinitum.

Should we not attempt to refute foolish claims made without merit just because it might hurt someone's feelings? Should we not hold up to scrutiny theories based on small samples of hand-written numbers when there are countless other collections of data that disagree?

What would be the key factor of proof for the "Rigged" theorist? United States government intervention? Do you really trust the government to be above corruption and bias? Third party commercial verification? But who verifies that the third party is trustworthy?

All the "Rigged' theorists demand incontrovertible proof that things are correct, but none can provide a source for this proof. So, you're left to make a risk assessment. Personally, I'll put my trust into an open collection of data from people with no reason to mislead me about the statistics they've collected. If that's not good enough for you, then don't play, or collect the necessary data to prove it's broken. Just stop running around making claims with no basis in reality.

Online Poker Forum at Full Tilt Poker