| Author |
Message |
Tuxedo-Slim
High Card
Joined: 04 Nov 2007
Posts: 17
|
 Posted: Thu Dec 06, 2007 1:43 am Post subject: short stacked all in |
 |
|
Has anyone noticed that the short stacked all in at Razz on FT gets beat every-time. For example the short stack can have A 2 3 and the one who goes in with them can have 7 8 k and they will always win 100% of the time.
Gets them to reload more money for FT |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
2 high flush
Forum Bounty Hunter
Joined: 03 Nov 2005
Posts: 5967
Location: Hell. Life Hell that is.
|
| Posted: Thu Dec 06, 2007 1:45 am Post subject: |
|
|
FT doesnt want you reloading, that takes time. they want you paying rake, so if they were going to rig it they would make everything as balanced as possible so that everyone would keep playing and paying rake. they dont make money off deposits, only from rake.
think about it logically and tell me im wrong. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Tuxedo-Slim
High Card
Joined: 04 Nov 2007
Posts: 17
|
| Posted: Thu Dec 06, 2007 1:49 am Post subject: |
|
|
Why If you reload and play again you dont pay rake???
Think about it Rake and more interest in there account.
I am not complaining about it I use it to my advantage. Anyone short stacked im all in and will win 100% |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Dashir
Pair
Joined: 24 Jan 2007
Posts: 42
|
| Posted: Thu Dec 13, 2007 12:11 am Post subject: |
|
|
| All you have to do is watch a game for awhile and you can see that it's not true. Not even remotely. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
razz champion
High Card
Joined: 26 Mar 2008
Posts: 1
|
| Posted: Tue Apr 01, 2008 5:29 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Dashir wrote: |
| All you have to do is watch a game for awhile and you can see that it's not true. Not even remotely. |
it's funny tux, because i think you have it backwards. the donk (usually playing hold em or stud) loses every hand then the final hand they have, could even be xxK10J and the other guy will just draw out to a pair or KQJ of sorts.
i find they SAVE the guy thats all in the limit games.
we're both probably wrong and it's all random (rolls eyes)
RC |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
sgspecial
Flush
Joined: 19 Jan 2006
Posts: 129
|
| Posted: Wed Apr 02, 2008 2:48 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| razz champion wrote: |
we're both probably wrong and it's all random (rolls eyes)
RC |
If it weren't all random, there would be a discernable trend over billions of hands that players a lot smarter than any of us would have figured out by now. They would be screaming as loud as possible, like with the Absolute poker scandal, because they have a lot more at stake than a $2.50 pot at 0.50/1.00 razz.
BTW, what are you the razz champion of? |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
FAQ
Search
Register
Profile
Log in to check your private messages
Log in
