|
| Author |
Message |
skeeter1114
Message Board Junkie
Joined: 28 Feb 2007
Posts: 1989
|
 Posted: Thu Aug 02, 2007 9:44 pm Post subject: Hand from MBJ HORSE |
 |
|
Full Tilt Poker Game #3135520769: Message Board Junkies (23426893), Table 3 - 40/80 - Limit Omaha H/L - 21:20:35 ET - 2007/08/02
Seat 1: Pete D (2,230)
Seat 2: skeeter1114 (1,100)
Seat 3: abrez1 (1,145)
Seat 4: DC11GE (1,175)
Seat 5: eyoraces (1,475)
Seat 6: dumwaldo (1,875)
eyoraces posts the small blind of 20
dumwaldo posts the big blind of 40
The button is in seat #4
*** HOLE CARDS ***
Dealt to skeeter1114 [6c 4c 4h 7h]
Pete D folds
skeeter1114 calls 40
abrez1 folds
DC11GE folds
eyoraces calls 20
dumwaldo checks
*** FLOP *** [3h Ac Kc]
abrez1 is sitting out
eyoraces has 15 seconds left to act
eyoraces checks
dumwaldo bets 40
skeeter1114 calls 40
eyoraces calls 40
*** TURN *** [3h Ac Kc] [4s]
eyoraces checks
dumwaldo bets 80
skeeter1114 raises to 160
eyoraces calls 160
dumwaldo calls 80
*** RIVER *** [3h Ac Kc 4s] [9h]
eyoraces checks
dumwaldo checks
skeeter1114 bets 80
eyoraces calls 80
dumwaldo calls 80
*** SHOW DOWN ***
skeeter1114 shows [6c 4c 4h 7h] three of a kind, Fours, for high and 7,6,4,3,A, for low
eyoraces shows [Qd Jh Ad As] three of a kind, Aces, for high
dumwaldo shows [6h Ah 9c 2s] two pair, Aces and Nines, for high and 6,4,3,2,A, for low
eyoraces wins the high pot (480) with three of a kind, Aces
dumwaldo wins the low pot (480) with 6,4,3,2,A
The game is now 50/100 Limit Razz with an ante of 10
*** SUMMARY ***
Total pot 960 | Rake 0
Board: [3h Ac Kc 4s 9h]
Seat 1: Pete D didn't bet (folded)
Seat 2: skeeter1114 showed [6c 4c 4h 7h] and lost with HI: three of a kind, Fours; LO: 7,6,4,3,A
Seat 3: abrez1 didn't bet (folded)
Seat 4: DC11GE (button) didn't bet (folded)
Seat 5: eyoraces (small blind) showed [Qd Jh Ad As] and won (480) with HI: three of a kind, Aces
Seat 6: dumwaldo (big blind) showed [6h Ah 9c 2s] and won (480) with HI: two pair, Aces and Nines; LO: 6,4,3,2,A
I'm still getting used to Omaha and Omaha H/L. Did I play this bad, or was I ok for thinking I had the best hand with no one else betting or raising? Thanks for your help. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Strasse
Forum Ego
Joined: 16 Nov 2005
Posts: 3933
Location: Austin, TX
|
| Posted: Thu Aug 02, 2007 10:58 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Yes, you played this hand bad, but not because you raised when you hit the 4. You played this hand bad because you played this hand. This hand is ABSOLUTELY HORRIBLE in omaha hi/lo. Middle cards are the worst, if you hit a nice high hand w/ them, you will only win half the pot, since there will be a low out there. If you are going for low, it is a bad low, and you will hardly ever win it. This hand should be instantly mucked from any position on the table. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
skeeter1114
Message Board Junkie
Joined: 28 Feb 2007
Posts: 1989
|
| Posted: Sat Aug 04, 2007 12:56 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Strasse wrote: |
| Yes, you played this hand bad, but not because you raised when you hit the 4. You played this hand bad because you played this hand. This hand is ABSOLUTELY HORRIBLE in omaha hi/lo. Middle cards are the worst, if you hit a nice high hand w/ them, you will only win half the pot, since there will be a low out there. If you are going for low, it is a bad low, and you will hardly ever win it. This hand should be instantly mucked from any position on the table. |
Strasse, I looked at that link that you posted in another thread, and after reading that, I now see how horrible this hand truly was. I think someone posted that this may look like a playable hand if you're used to Hold'em, and that is exactly my situation. I will be using the point system to try and guide me, and may post some HH for comments. But, thank you Strasse for your help, I appreciate it. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group
|
|
FAQ
Search
Register
Profile
Log in to check your private messages
Log in
