Online Poker Room
Our Poker Players
Texas Hold Em Download
How To Play Poker
Full Tilt Poker
Real Money Poker Games
News & Promotions
Poker Store
Online Poker Affiliates
Full Tilt Poker
Online Poker Forum at Full Tilt Poker
  FAQFAQ   SearchSearch    RegisterRegister   ProfileProfile  Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages  Log inLog in 

Online Poker Forum - Razz hand from MBJ HORSE last night

 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Online Poker Forum Home -> Razz
Author Message
Honest_Rob
Forum Pro


Joined: 21 Jul 2005
Posts: 5825
Location: counting my blessings

PostPosted: Fri Jul 27, 2007 11:50 am    Post subject: Razz hand from MBJ HORSE last night Reply with quote

This hand generated a lot of discussion at the table so I figured I'd post it. Please discuss the play and throw in any comments you want.

Full Tilt Poker Game #3067674995: Message Board Junkies (22896019), Table 3 - 150/300 Ante 25 - Limit Razz - 22:24:00 ET - 2007/07/26
Seat 1: Strasse (1,330)
Seat 2: Zerbet (1,365)
Seat 3: critterbugg (3,116)
Seat 4: Honest_Rob (3,425)
Seat 7: craigo6x (3,590)
Seat 8: smokindog (2,120)
Strasse antes 25
Zerbet antes 25
critterbugg antes 25
Honest_Rob antes 25
craigo6x antes 25
smokindog antes 25
*** 3RD STREET ***
Dealt to Strasse [7h]
Dealt to Zerbet [Ah]
Dealt to critterbugg [6h]
Dealt to Honest_Rob [2s 5c] [3s]
Dealt to craigo6x [3h]
Dealt to smokindog [5d]
Strasse is high with [7h]
Strasse brings in for 50
Zerbet folds
critterbugg completes it to 150
Honest_Rob raises to 300
craigo6x folds
smokindog folds
Strasse folds
critterbugg calls 150
*** 4TH STREET ***
Dealt to critterbugg [6h] [Jd]
Dealt to Honest_Rob [2s 5c 3s] [Ks]
critterbugg bets 150
Honest_Rob raises to 300
critterbugg calls 150
*** 5TH STREET ***
Dealt to critterbugg [6h Jd] [4c]
Dealt to Honest_Rob [2s 5c 3s Ks] [7s]
critterbugg bets 300
Honest_Rob raises to 600
critterbugg calls 300
*** 6TH STREET ***
Dealt to critterbugg [6h Jd 4c] [Ac]
Dealt to Honest_Rob [2s 5c 3s Ks 7s] [6s]
critterbugg bets 300
Honest_Rob calls 300
*** 7TH STREET ***
Dealt to Honest_Rob [2s 5c 3s Ks 7s 6s] [7d]
critterbugg bets 300
Honest_Rob calls 300
*** SHOW DOWN ***
critterbugg shows [Jh 4s 6h Jd 4c Ac 3c] J,6,4,3,A
Honest_Rob shows [7d 5c 3s Ks 7s 6s 2s] 7,6,5,3,2
Honest_Rob wins the pot (3,800) with 7,6,5,3,2
*** SUMMARY ***
Total pot 3,800 | Rake 0
Seat 1: Strasse folded on 3rd St.
Seat 2: Zerbet folded on 3rd St.
Seat 3: critterbugg showed [Jh 4s 6h Jd 4c Ac 3c] and lost with J,6,4,3,A
Seat 4: Honest_Rob showed [7d 5c 3s Ks 7s 6s 2s] and won (3,800) with 7,6,5,3,2
Seat 7: craigo6x folded on 3rd St.
Seat 8: smokindog folded on 3rd St.
Back to top
UFO1947
Alien Interrogator


Joined: 08 Jun 2006
Posts: 3128
Location: NS, Canada

PostPosted: Fri Jul 27, 2007 12:03 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

I'm no Razz expert, but it seems like you were behind after 4th (without looking at the final result)

however when the 4 and A came down for him. I'm guessing you believed he paired one of them or maybe both of them.

Is that similar to what you were thinking?
Back to top
Big Slick x13x
Forum Icon


Joined: 18 Jun 2006
Posts: 4135
Location: ROK

PostPosted: Fri Jul 27, 2007 12:19 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

NH Rob. I like the raise on fourth and fifth. It gave you the information you wanted and you got a lot of chips in the pot while you were ahead.
Back to top
PokerAA
Message Board Junkie


Joined: 24 Nov 2006
Posts: 1610

PostPosted: Fri Jul 27, 2007 1:47 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Big Slick x13x wrote:
NH Rob. I like the raise on fourth and fifth. It gave you the information you wanted and you got a lot of chips in the pot while you were ahead.


Yep, I think it was played very well since he could easily have a pair (at least).. Since you re-raised and he just called and slowed down, it seemed pretty obvious the he paired. And to slow down on 6th and 7th was also a very good move so that you don't waste any more chips if he didn't pair again. That hand was actually played perfectly, IMO.
Back to top
Pete D
Pistol Pete


Joined: 28 Sep 2006
Posts: 980
Location: The City

PostPosted: Fri Jul 27, 2007 2:01 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Rob- I thought you played it well. Maybe more aggressive than some others would have played it, but you put good pressure on.

When critterbugg did not re-raise you on 5th St, you figured to be in the lead... in other words, it told you he did not have 23, 25 or 35 in the hole. The ace on 6th for critter was a little scary (a 72 or 73 in the hole would have had you beat), but there's no way you can fold at that point, you're obviously pot committed... putting in 600 more to win 3200.

Assuming critter had 43 in the hole, the only thing I see wrong w/ this hand is that critter probably should have folded to your raise on 5th... then he would have lost only 900 chips on this hand instead of 1800.
Back to top
jbrennen
Straight Flush


Joined: 16 Aug 2005
Posts: 422

PostPosted: Fri Jul 27, 2007 5:18 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

The 4th street raise was ill-advised in my opinion. If your opponent has a hand even as weak as (8-7)-6-J, he should be reraising you here. With that hand, he's a 48-52 underdog, so the reraise is going to cost him on average about 0.04 small bets, or 0.02 big bets, but it could buy him a free card later in the hand. (I'm assuming that you wouldn't 4-bet here, that would be absolute spewage if you did.)

Also, unless you're just insane, your raise on 4th street just defined your hand for your opponent. I think that the information that you give by raising on 4th street is more valuable (to your opponent) than the information that you get from his reaction.

Just my opinion...

From 5th street on, I'm fine with your play. Your opponent was spewing chips on 6th and 7th street though.
Back to top
Pete D
Pistol Pete


Joined: 28 Sep 2006
Posts: 980
Location: The City

PostPosted: Fri Jul 27, 2007 5:56 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

I could do w/out the 4th St raise, but either way, it doesn't seem critical considering it's a small bet.

But the 5th St raise is riskier, imo. If Rob is beat here, he gets re-raised another large bet. If he's ahead (which he was), he'd often get his opponent to fold... but I'd want my opponent to chase his runner-runner, so I probably don't raise on 5th.

It turns out his opponent took the raise on 5th to be a bluff... or maybe the raise on 4th led critter to believe Rob was tilting (from an earlier hand?) and had nothing... if so, it worked just as Rob planned it all along Smile
Back to top
Honest_Rob
Forum Pro


Joined: 21 Jul 2005
Posts: 5825
Location: counting my blessings

PostPosted: Sun Jul 29, 2007 10:05 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Thanks for the analysis guys.

UFO-Well technically I was behind on 4th but we both bricked. I knew I had the best hand on 3rd so when we both bricked on 4th I still had the best hand. Neither of us was planning on using 4th street in our final hand so the difference between a King and a Jack here is negligible. Unless we keep bricking it won't play.

On 5th I raised to make him define his hand. I had a feeling he may have paired the 4 and when he didn't reraise me I was pretty sure he did. I thought he may have paired the Ace on 6th also but at that point I was OK with slowing down in case he didn't and because I know he's not folding at this point and I don't want to give away extra chips.
Back to top
Pete D
Pistol Pete


Joined: 28 Sep 2006
Posts: 980
Location: The City

PostPosted: Sun Jul 29, 2007 6:28 pm    Post subject: Re: Razz hand from MBJ HORSE last night Reply with quote

Honest_Rob wrote:
This hand generated a lot of discussion at the table so I figured I'd post it. Please discuss the play and throw in any comments you want.


Rob- What was discussed at the table? Were people critical of your raise on 4th and 5th?
Back to top
jbrennen
Straight Flush


Joined: 16 Aug 2005
Posts: 422

PostPosted: Sun Jul 29, 2007 11:54 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Honest_Rob wrote:
Neither of us was planning on using 4th street in our final hand so the difference between a King and a Jack here is negligible. Unless we keep bricking it won't play.


I think you may be underestimating the chance that you will end up with a hand that can't even beat a Jack-low... It turns out that in this particular situation, there's a nearly 30% chance that you'll end up with a Queen-low or worse (you'll brick at least twice). So I'd say the difference is certainly not negligible.
Back to top
Honest_Rob
Forum Pro


Joined: 21 Jul 2005
Posts: 5825
Location: counting my blessings

PostPosted: Mon Jul 30, 2007 12:42 am    Post subject: Re: Razz hand from MBJ HORSE last night Reply with quote

Pete D wrote:
Honest_Rob wrote:
This hand generated a lot of discussion at the table so I figured I'd post it. Please discuss the play and throw in any comments you want.


Rob- What was discussed at the table? Were people critical of your raise on 4th and 5th?

Critter said many things about the hand for a while after. Strasse argued with him and I said a couple things. I think critter kept changing his opinion but at some point he said I should have folded on 5th and then on 6th. He felt I played the hand awful in general.
Back to top
Flying_Kiwi
Message Board Junkie


Joined: 03 Sep 2006
Posts: 6009
Location: Centre of the Universe

PostPosted: Mon Jul 30, 2007 12:50 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Critter is a donk. He thinks the chance of hitting a flush draw is 50%. If anyone should've been folding, it was him.
Back to top
Lucky_Bub
Message Board Junkie


Joined: 11 Dec 2006
Posts: 1576
Location: Big Rock Candy Mountain

PostPosted: Mon Jul 30, 2007 12:59 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

I wouldn't have raised on 4th either.
Back to top
renegades8
Forum Fish


Joined: 26 Nov 2006
Posts: 3517
Location: spewing @ 25NL

PostPosted: Fri Aug 24, 2007 7:29 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

When I went through the hand, the only thing that really stuck out to me is that maybe you were behind on 5th street, not sure about the raise. Then again, there's a good chance he paired up, whch it appears that he did.
Back to top
sgspecial
Flush


Joined: 19 Jan 2006
Posts: 147

PostPosted: Mon Aug 27, 2007 3:37 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

jbrennen wrote:
Honest_Rob wrote:
Neither of us was planning on using 4th street in our final hand so the difference between a King and a Jack here is negligible. Unless we keep bricking it won't play.


I think you may be underestimating the chance that you will end up with a hand that can't even beat a Jack-low... It turns out that in this particular situation, there's a nearly 30% chance that you'll end up with a Queen-low or worse (you'll brick at least twice). So I'd say the difference is certainly not negligible.


Good call JB. There is a HUGE difference between saying "well we both bricked off so I'll call him" when your brick is worse, and raising the opponent in the same spot. Even if you got a tiny bit of +EV out of raising 4th (and 5th sts) which I doubt, you increased your variance by a lot and critter could have 3-bet you on either street to increase it more. He may even have chosen to slow down on 5th if he hadn't paired to suck you in for more big bets later in the hand.

The upshot is this is a tournament, and you put in over half your stack with this hand where you weren't sure where you stood in the hand until showdown. This was some seriously mistimed aggression by both you and your opponent... next time let him make all the mistakes.
Back to top
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Online Poker Forum Home -> Razz All times are GMT - 4 Hours
Page 1 of 1

 


Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group