Online Poker Room
Our Poker Players
Texas Hold Em Download
How To Play Poker
Full Tilt Poker
Real Money Poker Games
News & Promotions
Poker Store
Online Poker Affiliates
Full Tilt Poker
Online Poker Forum at Full Tilt Poker
  FAQFAQ   SearchSearch    RegisterRegister   ProfileProfile  Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages  Log inLog in 

Online Poker Forum - Tell me this wasnt the WORST play you've ever seen, and a pretty bad beat

 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Online Poker Forum Home -> Poker Stories
Author Message
24sooted
Flush


Joined: 27 Oct 2005
Posts: 128

PostPosted: Tue Nov 15, 2005 3:23 am    Post subject: Tell me this wasnt the WORST play you've ever seen, and a pretty bad beat Reply with quote

sorry i was all pissed and closed the screens out so i do not have the hand history, but i ASSURE YOU, the guy REALLY played this way.
$30 9 person, 4 of us left


i have 1700, the BB has 2500, chip leader has like 6000, other guy has like 2k

i have KK UTG, i raise from 100 to 350, EVERYONE calls

flop: 5 2 8, i go ALL IN for 1,350 - the size of the pot, they all fold to the BB

he INSTANTLY CALLS AND SHOWS Q 10, so im happy

turn : 9
river:J

and im out in 4th -- now seriously WHAT THE HELL could this guy have been thinking? anyone? theres always some one that wants to be like "well his odds were such and such" I ask you, what logical human being calls half his stack with Queen high, NO DRAWS???
Back to top
torgeauxSA
Flush


Joined: 26 Jun 2005
Posts: 137

PostPosted: Tue Nov 15, 2005 9:59 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

OK, it's definitely a world class bad beat, and your post flop play is fine. I do question your preflop play. With those stack sizes, your raise was gonna get called by the blinds and that only leaves one other player, right? And you don't know what the button had, as he folded, so it's not out of the ordinary necessarily that you got called pf.

As for his call of your all in, it's a really bad play, and nothing to be done, but lots of players will make speculative calls to cut the small stack. It's really a bad play with cards like his, but you see it a lot. Was he suited? 2 on the board? Or one at least?
Back to top
Jaconda78
Message Board Junkie


Joined: 06 Jul 2005
Posts: 4177

PostPosted: Tue Nov 15, 2005 12:00 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Your preflop raise is fine, I think - 3.5x BB. You could raise a bit more, but nothing wrong with what you did. As for him calling you on the flop - wow.... Shocked
Back to top
torgeauxSA
Flush


Joined: 26 Jun 2005
Posts: 137

PostPosted: Tue Nov 15, 2005 1:17 pm    Post subject: Re: Reply with quote

Jaconda78 wrote:
Your preflop raise is fine, I think - 3.5x BB. You could raise a bit more, but nothing wrong with what you did. As for him calling you on the flop - wow.... Shocked


Nope, with only 4 people left, and those stacks, that was far, far too small a bet. Only in a ivory tower vacuum would the standard 3.5xBB be sufficient. Under these circumstances, he needed to make it at least double that.
Back to top
24sooted
Flush


Joined: 27 Oct 2005
Posts: 128

PostPosted: Tue Nov 15, 2005 2:42 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

no he was NOT suited, and the reason i only raised to 3.5x the BB is because i was the short stack and i wanted one caller, not 3!!! FOR about 15 minutes every 350 raise was being folded all around or ONE player called, ONLY MINE got called by everyone -- if i had raised twice the normal raise no one would have called and 150 wasnt enough money to get me back on my feet. and torgeaux as far as your "ivory tower vacuum" comment -- seriously you are a loser bro. you stalk my posts and try to talk smack and criticize with some nerdy ass metaphor. God forbid you just wrote "well i think you should have raised to 700 at least" -- like a mature, polite person might have done. You are one of these people that will talk all day long because you are on the internet and u can hide behind your lord of the rings wallpaper but will never have the balls to back it up. Perhaps you would like to play me in a heads up match? im SURE you will wuss out, which is confusing because apparently i play as if im "in the ivory tower vacuum" and you should be able to take me down no problem. Please, dont waste your time arguing back with me, just type "yes" and the type of game u would like to play.

and torgeaux, u may disagree with my pre flop raise --- but you HAVE to admit him calling more than half his chips with Q high is INSANE, he cant even beat a bluff

and P.S. torgeaux i HATE wasting my energy on our arguments, as im sure you do -- so can you do me a favor and either NOT respond to my threads or at LEAST try not to be a jackass when you do. Id gladly do the same for you, and i think well both be happier..... lol
Back to top
torgeauxSA
Flush


Joined: 26 Jun 2005
Posts: 137

PostPosted: Tue Nov 15, 2005 3:18 pm    Post subject: Re: Reply with quote

24sooted wrote:
and torgeaux as far as your "ivory tower vacuum" comment -- seriously you are a loser bro. you stalk my posts and try to talk smack and criticize with some nerdy ass metaphor. God forbid you just wrote "well i think you should have raised to 700 at least" -- like a mature, polite person might have done.


Gee, sorry to disappoint you there 24, but you aren't important enough to stalk....sorry. If you are going to make 119 posts in 3 weeks, well, you'll find me responding just by virtue of your spamming the boards. I think if you'll read my post in response to YOUR post, you'll find the sort of thing you were looking for. The ivory tower comment was for Jaconda, who was parroting the "3.5xBB raise" line. My comments about your play were in my previous post.

Quote:

You are one of these people that will talk all day long because you are on the internet and u can hide behind your lord of the rings wallpaper but will never have the balls to back it up. Perhaps you would like to play me in a heads up match? im SURE you will wuss out, which is confusing because apparently i play as if im "in the ivory tower vacuum" and you should be able to take me down no problem. Please, dont waste your time arguing back with me, just type "yes" and the type of game u would like to play.


How about "No" instead? I don't do the HU SnGs as a rule, and I really, really don't play with people who annoy me, especially immature brats. However, feel free to name search me on line and join the SnGs I play. Oh, and you really did come off as tough there, it worked. That tough guy routine is a winner for you.

Quote:

and torgeaux, u may disagree with my pre flop raise --- but you HAVE to admit him calling more than half his chips with Q high is INSANE, he cant even beat a bluff

and P.S. torgeaux i HATE wasting my energy on our arguments, as im sure you do -- so can you do me a favor and either NOT respond to my threads or at LEAST try not to be a jackass when you do. Id gladly do the same for you, and i think well both be happier..... lol


The only jackassery here was yours. My reply to your post was entirely based on its merits, without comment about you or insult. You on the other hand failed to do the same. Re-read them, then maybe post again. You'll find this, for example:
Quote:
As for his call of your all in, it's a really bad play, and nothing to be done, but lots of players will make speculative calls to cut the small stack. It's really a bad play with cards like his, but you see it a lot. Was he suited? 2 on the board? Or one at least?
Back to top
24sooted
Flush


Joined: 27 Oct 2005
Posts: 128

PostPosted: Tue Nov 15, 2005 3:35 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

since the ivory tower comment was in reference to MY RAISE it was, ipso facto -- an insult to me as well. Bottom line is you are a know it all smart ass. and i wasnt trying to be tough, i just want you to leave me alone and not respond to my threads, ill extend you the same courtesy if you'd like. And enough with this "spamming" thing, . The only person who even cares about the number of threads and amount of time is you. Seriously, you MUST realize u are not a nice person, u have smart ass comments for everyone. And why, may i ask, do u not play the HU sngs? we can do a $5 if ud like, im sure u dont care if u lose 5 bucks. And again, i let you suck me in to an argument....... i have no will power. when referring to my play and saying "only in an ivory tower vacuum" would that play be correct is an insult, its not that complicated. OBVIOUSLY im going to get pissed. seriously, i dont know u nor care about you (and im sure u feel the same about me) and i try to be nice to people in life whenever possible. So, if you could refrain from making unwarranted smart ass remarks toward me i dont think either of us will ahve to waste our time "internet arguing" anymore -- it really is childish and WE BOTH are guilty -- so seriously, im trying to be the bigger person here -- lets just stop, ok?

P.S. you DID teach my about the edit feature which ive since used like 300 times, so u arent all bad lol and OTHER THAN the ivory tower vacuum comment, i thought your input WAS INDEED polite and helpful, is it THAT hrd to shave the sarcasm off the top?
Back to top
torgeauxSA
Flush


Joined: 26 Jun 2005
Posts: 137

PostPosted: Tue Nov 15, 2005 3:48 pm    Post subject: Re: Reply with quote

24sooted wrote:
since the ivory tower comment was in reference to MY RAISE it was, ipso facto -- an insult to me as well.

Seriously, you MUST realize u are not a nice person, u have smart ass comments for everyone.

when referring to my play and saying "only in an ivory tower vacuum" would that play be correct is an insult, its not that complicated. OBVIOUSLY im going to get pissed.

seriously, i dont know u nor care about you (and im sure u feel the same about me) and i try to be nice to people in life whenever possible. So, if you could refrain from making unwarranted smart ass remarks toward me i dont think either of us will ahve to waste our time "internet arguing" anymore -- it really is childish and WE BOTH are guilty -- so seriously, im trying to be the bigger person here -- lets just stop, ok?

P.S. you DID teach my about the edit feature which ive since used like 300 times, so u arent all bad lol


First, go back. Look at my posts before you started chest beating. You find an implied insult to your play in the ivory tower remark. It was specifically because of Jaconda saying "3.5xBB" which is exactly that, ivory tower, by the book commentary. I noted my objection to your raise in my post about that. I still think it was too small. No insult, just a critique of your play.

I'm not aware of any ad hominem attacks on you, although I have responded to your insulting posts in a like manner. I criticized your excessive posting in a thread about, guess what, your excessive posting. My comment about your post count is only where relevant, in this case, the "stalking" comment. If you post excessively, you will see more responses, seems like an easy connection.

Seriously, point out the "childish" part of my post. Anything? I wouldn't have used Ivory Tower in response to Jaconda if I'd known you'd blow a gasket.
Back to top
24sooted
Flush


Joined: 27 Oct 2005
Posts: 128

PostPosted: Tue Nov 15, 2005 4:06 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Are you done now? because i am. Somewhere deep inside i know you're tired of this.
Back to top
torgeauxSA
Flush


Joined: 26 Jun 2005
Posts: 137

PostPosted: Tue Nov 15, 2005 4:12 pm    Post subject: Re: Reply with quote

24sooted wrote:
Are you done now? because i am.


Again, no substantive response. OK. I'm still looking for the "unwarranted smart ass remarks toward" you. I'm also noting your desire to be the "bigger person" here when the only one insulting anyone is you.

Here's my bottom line: I'll keep responding, as always, to the substance of posts. Like my responsive post here, it will NOT be insulting or personal. I haven't in the past, nor will I in the future, seek your posts, but I will feel free to reply to any you post that seem interesting. I won't insult you, or make "unwarranted smart ass remarks". I leave you with just this to ponder:

Seriously, you MUST realize u are not a nice person, u have smart ass comments for everyone.

seriously you are a loser bro

You are one of these people that will talk all day long because you are on the internet and u can hide behind your lord of the rings wallpaper but will never have the balls to back it up.

either NOT respond to my threads or at LEAST try not to be a jackass when you do
Back to top
Jaconda78
Message Board Junkie


Joined: 06 Jul 2005
Posts: 4177

PostPosted: Tue Nov 15, 2005 4:16 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

How did I get involved in this?? Sheesh - I maintain that it's not a horrible raise, especially if, as he said, everyone had been folding to it lately. Can't we all just say "that guy's a dumbass" and move on?
Back to top
24sooted
Flush


Joined: 27 Oct 2005
Posts: 128

PostPosted: Tue Nov 15, 2005 4:19 pm    Post subject: Re: Reply with quote

torgeauxSA wrote:
24sooted wrote:
Are you done now? because i am.


Again, no substantive response. OK. I'm still looking for the "unwarranted smart ass remarks toward" you. I'm also noting your desire to be the "bigger person" here when the only one insulting anyone is you.

Here's my bottom line: I'll keep responding, as always, to the substance of posts. Like my responsive post here, it will NOT be insulting or personal. I haven't in the past, nor will I in the future, seek your posts, but I will feel free to reply to any you post that seem interesting. I won't insult you, or make "unwarranted smart ass remarks". I leave you with just this to ponder:

Seriously, you MUST realize u are not a nice person, u have smart ass comments for everyone.

seriously you are a loser bro

You are one of these people that will talk all day long because you are on the internet and u can hide behind your lord of the rings wallpaper but will never have the balls to back it up.

either NOT respond to my threads or at LEAST try not to be a jackass when you do



point taken, NOW are you done? this post was much better so im assuming we are on the right path here. The only reason it struck a chord is because we clashed once before on that stupid play money odds post and in THAT one you were not very nice.
Back to top
Mighty Russ
Pair


Joined: 17 Nov 2005
Posts: 26

PostPosted: Thu Nov 17, 2005 9:46 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Actually, I think ya'll should keep it up. I understand how it feels to the two of you, but seriously, this sort of thing is fun to read. Um, please don't attack me. It's no fun, I just curl up into a ball and cry

Anyway, I agree with you. If people are folding to 3.5BB, then you didn't want to bet anymore, or maybe they fold around and your hand is wasted. And you WANTED to go against this hand. Bad beat. Shake it off and wait for the next one.
Back to top
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Online Poker Forum Home -> Poker Stories All times are GMT - 4 Hours
Page 1 of 1

 


Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group