| Author |
Message |
davegk
High Card
Joined: 21 Jun 2007
Posts: 1
|
 Posted: Thu Jun 21, 2007 3:18 am Post subject: is Gus Hansen crazy? |
 |
|
So, I'm a big fan of Gus - been watching him play on the Omaha Hi tables. But here's a hand that I just don't get. I can see why he might call to see the flop, but the post flop play just doesn't make sense to me...
$100k pot
Full Tilt Poker Game #2726392323: Table Pantheon (6 max) - $200/$400 - Pot Limit Omaha Hi - 2:59:09 ET - 2007/06/21
Seat 1: Luigi66369 ($127,389)
Seat 2: Gus Hansen ($50,419)
Seat 3: Luck123 ($8,000)
Seat 4: mike the mantan ($62,967.50)
Seat 5: sbrugby ($71,988)
Seat 6: David Benyamine ($37,767.50)
mike the mantan has 5 seconds left to act
mike the mantan posts the small blind of $200
sbrugby posts the big blind of $400
The button is in seat #2
*** HOLE CARDS ***
David Benyamine folds
Luck123 is sitting out
Luigi66369 raises to $1,400
Gus Hansen raises to $4,800
mike the mantan folds
sbrugby folds
Luigi66369 raises to $15,000
Gus Hansen calls $10,200
*** FLOP *** [7s Tc Kd]
Luigi66369 bets $30,600
Gus Hansen raises to $35,419, and is all in
Luigi66369 calls $4,819
Gus Hansen shows [6d 4h 7d 5c]
Luigi66369 shows [Jd Ah Qd Ad]
*** TURN *** [7s Tc Kd] [Jh]
*** RIVER *** [7s Tc Kd Jh] [Jc]
Gus Hansen shows two pair, Jacks and Sevens
Luigi66369 shows a straight, Ace high
Luigi66369 wins the pot ($101,436) with a straight, Ace high
Gus Hansen adds $13,488.50
*** SUMMARY ***
Total pot $101,438 | Rake $2
Board: [7s Tc Kd Jh Jc]
Seat 1: Luigi66369 showed [Jd Ah Qd Ad] and won ($101,436) with a straight, Ace high
Seat 2: Gus Hansen (button) showed [6d 4h 7d 5c] and lost with two pair, Jacks and Sevens
Seat 3: Luck123 is sitting out
Seat 4: mike the mantan (small blind) folded before the Flop
Seat 5: sbrugby (big blind) folded before the Flop
Seat 6: David Benyamine didn't bet (folded) |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Kloaked Spirit
Royal Flush
Joined: 03 Nov 2005
Posts: 869
|
| Posted: Thu Jun 21, 2007 3:44 am Post subject: |
|
|
| If I were to try and make a justification, I'd say that Gus knew Luigi had AAxx. Post flop, I'd imagine that Gus believed the K and the T really didn't help Luigi at all. That being the case, Gus probably felt that he had enough outs where it would be more +EV to try and luck out then it was to fold since he'd have 11 outs. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
ambitious207
Message Board Junkie
Joined: 07 Mar 2006
Posts: 2122
Location: Maine
|
| Posted: Thu Jun 21, 2007 3:59 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Kloaked Spirit wrote: |
| If I were to try and make a justification, I'd say that Gus knew Luigi had AAxx. Post flop, I'd imagine that Gus believed the K and the T really didn't help Luigi at all. That being the case, Gus probably felt that he had enough outs where it would be more +EV to try and luck out then it was to fold since he'd have 11 outs. |
That is exactly how I saw it too. Gus plays on a different level than most can comprehend. I'll tell you one thing though. His good hands ALWAYS gets paid off, and its usually in the tune of his opponents whole stack.
Gus Hansen is also a sicko. He loves juicy action. Kind of like Manny Ramirez "just being Manny", this is a case of Gus Hansen "just being Gus" |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
8ANASHS
High Card
Joined: 23 May 2007
Posts: 14
Location: STOCKHOLM,NORSBORG,ATHENS,PLATANOS
|
| Posted: Mon Jun 25, 2007 11:28 am Post subject: |
|
|
DAVID BENYAMINE IS CRAZY...I WONDER WHERE HE FINDS THE MONEY...  |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Jobe Gilchrist
Message Board Junkie
Joined: 09 Apr 2006
Posts: 3446
Location: "the most commonly-uttered phrase by vampire bats is 'it's not as cool as it sounds'"
|
| Posted: Mon Jun 25, 2007 11:43 am Post subject: |
|
|
| When does it make more sense to consider explanations that don't start from first principles like "it's obviously a genius move, I mean come on, he's a pro"? Is it completely ridiculous to suggest that he was just being a gambling idiot? That people who will drop 100K (I don't know if Gus does this personally) on a golf match against someone with a handicap 10 strokes lower won't ever play a poker hand ridiculously? |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
girlypro
Princess of Poker
Joined: 13 Jul 2005
Posts: 1190
Location: new york city
|
| Posted: Mon Jun 25, 2007 12:01 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Jobe Gilchrist wrote: |
| When does it make more sense to consider explanations that don't start from first principles like "it's obviously a genius move, I mean come on, he's a pro"? Is it completely ridiculous to suggest that he was just being a gambling idiot? That people who will drop 100K (I don't know if Gus does this personally) on a golf match against someone with a handicap 10 strokes lower won't ever play a poker hand ridiculously? |
At times, some of the so-called best pro's will be in the mood to gamble and if the mood to do so strikes them while playing poker, then hands may get played accordingly. What is hysterical to me is how if a pro play's a hand in an unorthodox manner, it is generally considered some genious move, even if it was good old gambling because he/she felt lucky, while if any given amateur were to pull the same exact move, they would automatically be labeled a fish for the donk play. There is a double standard even in poker! |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
cds tripaces
Royal Flush
Joined: 18 Oct 2006
Posts: 942
Location: Maryland
|
| Posted: Mon Jun 25, 2007 12:23 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| i watch Gus play pretty regularly..he is a very very loose aggressive he will play any hand any time for any ammount. That being said, he does get some bonuses for playing in this manner. He gets his monsters paid almost all the time, and when one of those junk hands hits big he usually gets paid off nicely too. Plus Gus is a luckbox and has the roll to play this style. Its way to crazy for my blood but he gets his monsters paid off alot more than guys like Brian Townsend and Patrik Antonius. Its really hard for any of us to say why he does something in one instance. He may have had a read based on past hands or something. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Kloaked Spirit
Royal Flush
Joined: 03 Nov 2005
Posts: 869
|
| Posted: Mon Jun 25, 2007 11:12 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| girlypro wrote: |
| At times, some of the so-called best pro's will be in the mood to gamble and if the mood to do so strikes them while playing poker, then hands may get played accordingly. What is hysterical to me is how if a pro play's a hand in an unorthodox manner, it is generally considered some genious move, even if it was good old gambling because he/she felt lucky, while if any given amateur were to pull the same exact move, they would automatically be labeled a fish for the donk play. There is a double standard even in poker! |
Sure that's true. However does that really pertain to this situation? There's not a whole lot of this hand history that screams unorthodox. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
girlypro
Princess of Poker
Joined: 13 Jul 2005
Posts: 1190
Location: new york city
|
| Posted: Mon Jun 25, 2007 11:44 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Kloaked Spirit wrote: |
| girlypro wrote: |
| At times, some of the so-called best pro's will be in the mood to gamble and if the mood to do so strikes them while playing poker, then hands may get played accordingly. What is hysterical to me is how if a pro play's a hand in an unorthodox manner, it is generally considered some genious move, even if it was good old gambling because he/she felt lucky, while if any given amateur were to pull the same exact move, they would automatically be labeled a fish for the donk play. There is a double standard even in poker! |
Sure that's true. However does that really pertain to this situation? There's not a whole lot of this hand history that screams unorthodox. |
My commentary was actually more in support of, as well as elaborating on Jobe's post, in regards to pro's and gambling. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Big Slick x13x
Forum Icon
Joined: 18 Jun 2006
Posts: 4117
Location: ROK
|
| Posted: Tue Jun 26, 2007 1:00 am Post subject: |
|
|
| Gus is probably one of the most methodical poker players. He usually has a good reason for every move he makes. There's always a method to the madness. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Jobe Gilchrist
Message Board Junkie
Joined: 09 Apr 2006
Posts: 3446
Location: "the most commonly-uttered phrase by vampire bats is 'it's not as cool as it sounds'"
|
| Posted: Tue Jun 26, 2007 9:42 am Post subject: |
|
|
| Big Slick x13x wrote: |
| Gus is probably one of the most methodical poker players. He usually has a good reason for every move he makes. There's always a method to the madness. |
That's my entire point. Everybody automatically assumes there's a method to the madness, because they have no information either way, and won't just admit that they don't know if he's donking or doing something brilliant. A little humility, folks. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Kloaked Spirit
Royal Flush
Joined: 03 Nov 2005
Posts: 869
|
| Posted: Wed Jun 27, 2007 12:07 am Post subject: |
|
|
| Jobe Gilchrist wrote: |
| That's my entire point. Everybody automatically assumes there's a method to the madness, because they have no information either way, and won't just admit that they don't know if he's donking or doing something brilliant. A little humility, folks. |
I can't say I know Gus well enough to know the true reason of this hand. However, if I can make a completely legitimate and mathematical reasoning behind every action, I'm more inclined to say it's more brilliance than donk. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Autosuggestion
Message Board Junkie
Joined: 02 May 2007
Posts: 1122
Location: New Jersey
|
| Posted: Thu Aug 09, 2007 5:06 am Post subject: |
|
|
| Yes, yes he is crazy. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Omaha Angel
High Card
Joined: 19 Jan 2007
Posts: 6
|
| Posted: Tue Aug 21, 2007 9:30 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| girlypro wrote: |
| Jobe Gilchrist wrote: |
| When does it make more sense to consider explanations that don't start from first principles like "it's obviously a genius move, I mean come on, he's a pro"? Is it completely ridiculous to suggest that he was just being a gambling idiot? That people who will drop 100K (I don't know if Gus does this personally) on a golf match against someone with a handicap 10 strokes lower won't ever play a poker hand ridiculously? |
At times, some of the so-called best pro's will be in the mood to gamble and if the mood to do so strikes them while playing poker, then hands may get played accordingly. What is hysterical to me is how if a pro play's a hand in an unorthodox manner, it is generally considered some genious move, even if it was good old gambling because he/she felt lucky, while if any given amateur were to pull the same exact move, they would automatically be labeled a fish for the donk play. There is a double standard even in poker! |
gotta say I agree with this statement more thanmany I have read... |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
I Eat Squirts
High Card
Joined: 22 Aug 2007
Posts: 1
|
| Posted: Wed Aug 22, 2007 9:02 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| It very well could be that Gus was committed and tried to take the lucky route. Didn't work! |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
FAQ
Search
Register
Profile
Log in to check your private messages
Log in
