| Author |
Message |
luvdoinit Straight Flush
Joined: 17 Aug 2005 Posts: 353 Location: California
|
Posted: Fri Nov 04, 2005 5:17 pm Post subject: WOULD BE NICE TO GET MORE PEOPLE INTERESTED IN RAZZ |
|
|
| What can we do to get more people interested in playing razz. I've made a post about how fun it is which got zero response. I'd love to bring in a bunch of new fish into razz wouldnt you!! |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
BOYNAMEDSUE Moderator
Joined: 27 Jun 2005 Posts: 9542 Location: Mypos
|
Posted: Sat Nov 05, 2005 12:36 am Post subject: |
|
|
After a long layoff I've started playing razz again. I played a heads-up SNG the other night, and I have to admit, it was fun.
I don't think I will be playing $2/4 and $3/6 again, though, for a long time. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
guitarguy178 Message Board Junkie
Joined: 24 Jul 2005 Posts: 2114 Location: At the crossroads
|
Posted: Sat Nov 05, 2005 1:52 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| I love playing razz, it's one of my best games. Problems I don't play as often simply because it's hard to find a full game or even anyone playing at the levels I like to play. I would bet you if ESPN featured a razz event that you would see a few more players. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
captain c-dogg High Card
Joined: 19 Jun 2007 Posts: 10
|
Posted: Sun Jun 24, 2007 4:34 pm Post subject: Re: WOULD BE NICE TO GET MORE PEOPLE INTERESTED IN RAZZ |
|
|
| luvdoinit wrote: |
| What can we do to get more people interested in playing razz. I've made a post about how fun it is which got zero response. I'd love to bring in a bunch of new fish into razz wouldnt you!! |
70% tilt razz players would be considered monkeys.
it's annoying to play against some idiot calling a completed Jack and now showing JJ on 5th and still outdrawing you.
less those idiots the better. gimmie the fools that play 9's and 8's and think their good =) |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Flying_Kiwi Bird of Mystery
Joined: 03 Sep 2006 Posts: 8459 Location: Spewing bonus $
|
Posted: Sun Jun 24, 2007 5:47 pm Post subject: Re: WOULD BE NICE TO GET MORE PEOPLE INTERESTED IN RAZZ |
|
|
| captain c-dogg wrote: |
it's annoying to play against some idiot calling a completed Jack and now showing JJ on 5th and still outdrawing you.
less those idiots the better. |
You realise this statement makes you an idiot? |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
jbrennen Straight Flush
Joined: 16 Aug 2005 Posts: 422
|
Posted: Mon Jun 25, 2007 12:10 am Post subject: Re: WOULD BE NICE TO GET MORE PEOPLE INTERESTED IN RAZZ |
|
|
| Flying_Kiwi wrote: |
| You realise this statement makes you an idiot? |
No, it just means he doesn't like variance.
In which case, Razz might not be the game for you.  |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Foxy_Boxer Straight
Joined: 05 Jan 2007 Posts: 105
|
Posted: Sun Jul 01, 2007 8:49 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I think the rising popularity of HORSE is helping razz along. And since this year ESPN will be showing extended coverage of the 50K event, they will undoubtedly show some razz.
Apparently the 2004 razz event was televised (I didn't see it), and it wasn't well-received. I heard part of the reason was because the guys at the final table were grumbling the whole time after continually bricking up. Who would want to play a game even the pros seem to hate? Hopefully the game will start getting better exposure after the HORSE event airs this year.
I think people would be more interested if it was called by it's full name, razzle dazzle.  |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
USFDoh Royal Flush
Joined: 09 Aug 2006 Posts: 507 Location: Why sitting in my chair , of course
|
Posted: Mon Jul 02, 2007 9:45 am Post subject: Re: WOULD BE NICE TO GET MORE PEOPLE INTERESTED IN RAZZ |
|
|
| captain c-dogg wrote: |
it's annoying to play against some idiot calling a completed Jack and now showing JJ on 5th and still outdrawing you.
|
My god man. I WANT those people playing me. The more the better! |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
sgspecial Full House
Joined: 19 Jan 2006 Posts: 180
|
Posted: Mon Jul 02, 2007 11:31 am Post subject: |
|
|
| Foxy_Boxer wrote: |
I think the rising popularity of HORSE is helping razz along. And since this year ESPN will be showing extended coverage of the 50K event, they will undoubtedly show some razz.
Apparently the 2004 razz event was televised (I didn't see it), and it wasn't well-received. I heard part of the reason was because the guys at the final table were grumbling the whole time after continually bricking up. Who would want to play a game even the pros seem to hate? Hopefully the game will start getting better exposure after the HORSE event airs this year.
I think people would be more interested if it was called by it's full name, razzle dazzle.  |
In the footage of the 2004 razz event not only were the players grumbling, but Norm Chad was whining endlessly about the game as well. They basically made it the butt of every joke, and I think if the final 3 were a bunch of nobodies it never would have been aired at all. As it was, TJ Cloutier beat out Dutch Boyd and Howard Lederer and star power prevailed in getting it on to the roster.
While I think Norm was being very unfair in his comments, I can't lay all the blame on him as most of the pros DO hate the game. It can be brutal and frustrating at times, but so can any poker game. Are most razz beats really any worse than losing to a 2-outer on the river in HE? No, they just happen more often. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Pete D Pistol Pete
Joined: 28 Sep 2006 Posts: 1885 Location: California
|
Posted: Sat Oct 06, 2007 5:21 am Post subject: |
|
|
While Razz or any of the Stud games will most likely never reach the popularity of NLHE, especially in terms of a television viewing audience... I think it will gain in popularity over time.
Seems like more and more Razz cash tables are full these days and Event #2 in FTOPS VI is Razz. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
njpokerhoney Message Board Junkie
Joined: 19 Jul 2007 Posts: 1554 Location: In Your Dreams
|
Posted: Sat Oct 06, 2007 7:35 am Post subject: |
|
|
| Pete D wrote: |
| I think it will gain in popularity over time. |
Razz is definitely fun and exciting (to me). Wish FT had more razz tournys. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
spike420211 Forum Yoda
Joined: 25 Apr 2007 Posts: 4062 Location: Pennsylvania, where poker is now LEGAL!
|
Posted: Sat Oct 06, 2007 10:05 am Post subject: |
|
|
actually, i'm taking a break from razz for a bit...
been doing the late-night 1.00 mtt @stars[avg:150-200 players]...
Kinda more of a social gathering, the overlay sucks.
after having bubbled just out of cash my last 2 tourneys,
i've decided to take at least a week off from it.
Not to mention I've been busy with the 1-pt.-a day promo here. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
ciapoker High Card
Joined: 09 Oct 2007 Posts: 1
|
Posted: Tue Oct 09, 2007 4:12 pm Post subject: How to convince... |
|
|
| The best way to get people to play razz is probably to convince them that its the easiest game to play. Saying that, I honestly do believe that razz is the best game to introduce someone to poker with. For most today, it begins and ends with hold 'em. But most internet and young players probably play the game much too aggressively (and unnecessarily). Playing a game like razz would slow them down a bit and teach them to actually play poker, and not just hold 'em. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
aceoldlady High Card
Joined: 11 Oct 2007 Posts: 4
|
Posted: Thu Oct 11, 2007 11:17 am Post subject: |
|
|
I must admit... the only thing i know about Razz is what I read in the Tiltpoker game help basics. NOT MUCH. I've observed the hands in both real & play money but I've learned the most by reading posts in the forum.
Last night I entered the freeplay. I had a great time that lasted 3 hours. I don't remember where I placed but it was much better than midline. I loved the fast play -- betting. I was never bored. As a matter of fact, the play moved along so fast.... I had a hard time following the flow sometimes. While I played I just tried to remember that 2 highs would blow the hand & folded when then hit. That strategy seemed to work for the most part..... beginners luck? Probably. But that's the kind of game I need. One that requires s bity more luck than deception -- because I'm transparent at hold'em.
I think I'm hooked. Someone mentioned in a post about the idiots who bet on J showing... I was one of those persons. But only if it was my one or two highs.... What's wrong with that? Isn't that OK?
Thankfully, I'm here for the thrill & fun of the gaming. I only play with money I can afford to lose. If I win along the way it's more fun of course but I don't expect to do more than break even.....
Cheers.  |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|