|
| Author |
Message |
TilterDoug Site Admin
Joined: 25 Jul 2005 Posts: 297
|
Posted: Sun Nov 06, 2005 3:30 am Post subject: |
|
|
24sooted,
It is an interesting question. Pros swap pieces with each other in major tournaments all the time, even deep into the tournament. In some of the smaller WSOP events this year, I saw deals made for 2% or 3% swaps when the tournament was down to the final two tables. The important thing is for the swap amount to be small enough that it doesn't impact decisions at the table.
If two players have 30% or 40% of each other, and both make a final table, I have a hard time believing it doesn't factor into their decisions, even if the players aren't trying to do anything wrong. If they go all-in, and you fold AA so you don't bust your "investment" early, this is obviously a black and white problem. But what if you have AK? JJ? These are hands you might call with to bust someone else, but your calling requirements may shift just a bit since you have a substantial piece of the guy.
Point of the story is, I doubt any site (or live casino) would enforce a rule saying nobody can own pieces of someone else. If you want to be honest about it, then it is up to you not to let it affect your strategy. If you are blatently folding AA not to bust him, you can both be DQ'd, but no site can fault you for folding JJ against the guy.
One suggestion is to make a deal with your friend like this. Say you are playing a $1000 WSOP event. You could swap 25% with each other, with a maximum payout of $2000. That way, if one of you loses and one wins big, the loser gets his buy-in taken care of, plus some profit. But if you both end up making it deep into the tournament, the deal will basically be off since you are both guaranteed a big payout, so the deal wont impact any big decisions late in the tournament. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Jaconda78 Message Board Junkie
Joined: 06 Jul 2005 Posts: 4177
|
Posted: Sun Nov 06, 2005 3:01 pm Post subject: Re: |
|
|
| Jaconda78 wrote: |
| The mods aren't here to answer poker questions - they're here to answer forum questions and deal with forum issues. They are not pros and answering questions such as these is not their job. |
Hmph. Guess I was wrong. Sorry. Look, luv - I'm admitting I was wrong! |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Otto410 Royal Flush
Joined: 17 Oct 2005 Posts: 850 Location: The Land Of Pleasant Living
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
COMRAD Royal Flush
Joined: 15 Sep 2005 Posts: 732 Location: california
|
Posted: Mon Nov 07, 2005 6:04 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| alright 2-4 all i'm saying is that it's way too easy for someone to start with the "girlfriend theory" and then try to up the stakes.if you play your "girlfriend"the same as you play everyone else then fine,but it DOESN'T happen!yes people buddy up all the time and it's LAME!do it yourself instead of tryin to UP your odds! |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Jaconda78 Message Board Junkie
Joined: 06 Jul 2005 Posts: 4177
|
Posted: Mon Nov 07, 2005 7:07 pm Post subject: Re: |
|
|
| COMRAD wrote: |
| alright 2-4 all i'm saying is that it's way too easy for someone to start with the "girlfriend theory" and then try to up the stakes.if you play your "girlfriend"the same as you play everyone else then fine,but it DOESN'T happen!yes people buddy up all the time and it's LAME!do it yourself instead of tryin to UP your odds! |
I beg to differ. When i play with my boyfriend, I am not his girlfriend - I'm an opponent. We try our best to take each other's money, and show no mercy. We're aware that it's poker, and is seperate from our relationship, and hold no grudges. It works out well enough! |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
stevening High Card
Joined: 21 Nov 2005 Posts: 1 Location: Mankato
|
Posted: Mon Nov 21, 2005 6:35 pm Post subject: collusion |
|
|
I don't know anyone else that plays online. So I couldn't collude even if I wanted to.
It's pointless to whine about it, however, it has to take place. When it CAN happen it WILL happen. We can piss and moan, say, "nasty, nasty!" but it changes nothing. It's going to take place. Count on it.
So, what's the bottom line?
Here's how I see it and feel free to add your thoughts about the benefits and downside of colluding. Stay away from moralizing please. Help me and others understand it.
A and B are colluding here are some cases:
1. A gets pocket Aces. A somehow indicates that he has a monster. Now on a real table, I suspect that his opponents will be watching for this and he needs to be careful of a tell. This is key (assuming it happens).
What will B do?
1.a he folds immediately. Let's call this RUNAWAY.
1.b he raises A who bets a token bet. He's really raising the table on behalf of A. Let's call this PUMPING.
1.c ? what else?
2. A and B both get crap hands but agree to bluff. Let's call this CRAPPING.
2.a if C (not coluding with a halo over his/her head) has a monster he/she would like this.
2.b all the rest have crap, believe either A or B has a monster and they get out.
please add some more in here..... |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Honest_Rob Forum Pro
Joined: 21 Jul 2005 Posts: 5849 Location: counting my blessings
|
Posted: Thu Nov 24, 2005 10:58 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| It's not collusion. It happens all the time and if FT ever froze anyone's account for it, it would be a shame. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
COMRAD Royal Flush
Joined: 15 Sep 2005 Posts: 732 Location: california
|
Posted: Sat Nov 26, 2005 8:06 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| That's funny jaconda,I could just picture me and my wife battling at poker(I'd probably end up sleeping on the couch).24sooted,sorry for the lame comments, I just know a few people that ALWAYS try to cheat at any game they play.It would suck(I know this isn't what you were talking about)to be in a cash game where half the table was in together taking innocent peoples money.although,now I think i could still take em.........I'm not a conspiracy theorist just new.......I have said some things i regret,especially after seeing jets fan post.I refuse to be like that,so I would like to apologize for cheap shots at jaconda and to anyone else i have offended.I will be working on my etiquette, and try to be more civil with replies that actually have substance. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Jaconda78 Message Board Junkie
Joined: 06 Jul 2005 Posts: 4177
|
Posted: Sat Nov 26, 2005 9:24 pm Post subject: Re: |
|
|
| COMRAD wrote: |
| That's funny jaconda,I could just picture me and my wife battling at poker(I'd probably end up sleeping on the couch).24sooted,sorry for the lame comments, I just know a few people that ALWAYS try to cheat at any game they play.It would suck(I know this isn't what you were talking about)to be in a cash game where half the table was in together taking innocent peoples money.although,now I think i could still take em.........I'm not a conspiracy theorist just new.......I have said some things i regret,especially after seeing jets fan post.I refuse to be like that,so I would like to apologize for cheap shots at jaconda and to anyone else i have offended.I will be working on my etiquette, and try to be more civil with replies that actually have substance. |
Comrad, I am perfectly willing to forgive and move on - apology accepted.
Perhaps you could beat a table of players playing together - but why go into a game where they have an unfair edge? I would avoid it, because even if I could beat it, I could certainly beat a fair game for more, faster.
As for the boyfriend thing - most of the guys I've dated have played poker (in fact, I met many of them at the table), and any guy that played that wasn't able to play fairly against me would be shown the door (after I won his chips, of course). I HATE any form of cheating, and refuse to tolerate it in myself or others. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|
Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group
|
|