| Author |
Message |
Dierwolf2000 Pair
Joined: 01 Jul 2007 Posts: 43
|
Posted: Sun Feb 24, 2008 10:04 am Post subject: Re: Never bring in for a completion in stud hi |
|
|
| Perry Friedman wrote: |
| You should never bring in for a completion in stud hi, except in very rare tournament situations. |
as i said in another topic I am fairly new to stud, so I don't feel qualified to agree or disagree, however I am curious Perry, what you think qualifies as that rare tournament situation. Just one of those "maximize agression" situations or what? |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Dierwolf2000 Pair
Joined: 01 Jul 2007 Posts: 43
|
Posted: Sun Feb 24, 2008 10:05 am Post subject: Re: Never bring in for a completion in stud hi |
|
|
| Perry Friedman wrote: |
| You should never bring in for a completion in stud hi, except in very rare tournament situations. |
as i said in another topic I am fairly new to stud, so I don't feel qualified to agree or disagree, however I am curious Perry, what you think qualifies as that rare tournament situation. Just one of those "maximize agression" situations or what? |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Big Slick x13x Forum Icon
Joined: 18 Jun 2006 Posts: 5601 Location: The U.S.A.
|
Posted: Sun Feb 24, 2008 10:38 am Post subject: |
|
|
| The rare case is when you are in a tournament and short stacked, holding an above avg hand. that you're ready to go all the way with. Naturally you want to get as many chips in the pot as you can while you're certain you are ahead. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
mshudson High Card
Joined: 16 Jan 2008 Posts: 5
|
Posted: Mon Feb 25, 2008 3:24 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| never say never |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
mshudson High Card
Joined: 16 Jan 2008 Posts: 5
|
Posted: Mon Feb 25, 2008 3:25 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| never say never |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
mshudson High Card
Joined: 16 Jan 2008 Posts: 5
|
Posted: Mon Feb 25, 2008 3:27 pm Post subject: |
|
|
 |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Dierwolf2000 Pair
Joined: 01 Jul 2007 Posts: 43
|
Posted: Mon Sep 15, 2008 12:09 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| so i am also curious whether you guys think this applies to stud 8 as well? |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Strasse Forum ***
Joined: 16 Nov 2005 Posts: 6777 Location: Houston, TX
|
Posted: Mon Sep 15, 2008 1:18 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Yes it applies to stud 8 because none of the concepts of why it is a bad play change. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
nutdriver High Card
Joined: 26 Apr 2008 Posts: 9
|
Posted: Tue Oct 14, 2008 3:29 am Post subject: |
|
|
Strasse has not played enough stud , at least on FT, to have a valid opinion other then the purely theoretical.
There are several situations where a completed bring in may be the best option. In the right game state completing with rolled is a good play, in others, a stone cold bluff completion may be the way to go. It really depends on the players, the action, and the ante.  |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Strasse Forum ***
Joined: 16 Nov 2005 Posts: 6777 Location: Houston, TX
|
Posted: Tue Oct 14, 2008 3:38 am Post subject: |
|
|
| nutdriver wrote: |
Strasse has not played enough stud , at least on FT, to have a valid opinion other then the purely theoretical.
|
I LOL'ed. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
2 high flush Forum Crybaby
Joined: 03 Nov 2005 Posts: 7400 Location: Climbing out of hell, life hell that is
|
Posted: Tue Oct 14, 2008 3:42 am Post subject: |
|
|
| nice stud hand in that sig btw. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Lancy Howard Four of a Kind
Joined: 04 Jul 2005 Posts: 283 Location: 2 hours from Atlantic City!
|
Posted: Tue Oct 21, 2008 9:19 am Post subject: |
|
|
I never complete when forced to bring in.
Good initial post.  |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|