Online Poker Room
Our Poker Players
Texas Hold Em Download
How To Play Poker
Full Tilt Poker
Real Money Poker Games
News & Promotions
Poker Store
Online Poker Affiliates
Full Tilt Poker
Online Poker Forum at Full Tilt Poker
  FAQFAQ   SearchSearch    RegisterRegister   ProfileProfile  Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages  Log inLog in 

Online Poker Forum - Which Hand Would You Rather Have Pre-Flop????

 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Online Poker Forum Home -> Omaha Poker
Author Message
Lucky_Bub
Message Board Junkie


Joined: 11 Dec 2006
Posts: 1506
Location: I Ran Away

PostPosted: Wed Jan 10, 2007 6:33 pm    Post subject: Which Hand Would You Rather Have Pre-Flop???? Reply with quote

AAKK or 4567 double suited? (Please note 4657 double suited is just a example. We could be talking 3456 double suited 6789 double suited.... you get the point.)

With a hand like AAKK, you bet pre-flop to drive out weaker hands, and may-be even post-flop to see where your hand stands. With a double suited connecting hand you can be a little sneeky.

It's also hard to get the drawing hand to fold. According to the math there's a good chance they will bust big pairs. I've seen times going to the river, the person with the best hand, had quite a bit of the deck against him with the other players draws.

With that said, a hand like AAKK can win you alot of money, if the other player missed his draw.


Last edited by Lucky_Bub on Mon Jul 30, 2007 6:14 pm; edited 4 times in total
Back to top
goomlah
Royal Flush


Joined: 08 Sep 2005
Posts: 561
Location: Chicago

PostPosted: Wed Jan 10, 2007 8:38 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

For me, You're not playing 3456 or any of those wrap hands because you're double suited. You're looking for the straight. Having that said, unless if AAKK is at least partly suited, I'd rather have the wrap hand because of more possibilities.
Back to top
FsuBostonMike
Pair


Joined: 10 Nov 2006
Posts: 36
Location: Boston, MA

PostPosted: Thu Jan 11, 2007 2:36 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

I play the suited connectors over AAKK.
Back to top
JackBileDuct
Full House


Joined: 02 May 2006
Posts: 206

PostPosted: Thu Jan 11, 2007 2:40 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

The wrap hand. I have been loading up at H/L with hands like that. You know the guys raising have AA and maybe a 2 for the low and a K or so. I'll call with something like 89s 7Jo and rip em up. Odds are if there are more than 2 in the hand somebody has at least 2 pr. Yet AA guys keeps betting and calls me a donkey for not folding to his 3x BB raise preflop Smile.
Back to top
Kloaked Spirit
Royal Flush


Joined: 03 Nov 2005
Posts: 869

PostPosted: Thu Jan 11, 2007 6:05 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

If it's heads up? AAKK and it's not even a close decision.

Multiway hands get a little tougher. AAKK is going to be the favorite preflop, and you will hit a set about 25% of the time. That with a 2 Ace high flush draw will make for a very strong hand even multiway.

With a connecting hand it's easier to tell if it hit you and how well it hit you if the flop comes out ragged. J-5-3 rainbow will be a pretty easy fold, but may not be so easy for the AAKK hand.
Back to top
dodge these
Straight Flush


Joined: 21 Jun 2006
Posts: 457

PostPosted: Thu Jan 11, 2007 8:52 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

I'm prety new to this but I'll take the AAKK any day esp if it is also suited. However, if there are no big raises I will always try to play a hand like the mid connectors just to ctach people pushing hard with aces only to run into my 2 pair with the nut wrap... Basically iif I can get half my stack or more in preflop I love the aces, but if it just a standard raise with a cuple f call I like the connectrs cause they are easier to get away from if you do not improve and will ften get paid of by people not suspecting them.
Back to top
barkerj7676
High Card


Joined: 29 Sep 2006
Posts: 6

PostPosted: Mon Jan 15, 2007 9:24 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

I would play the wrap 100% of the time as was stated ealier it is easier to know when you hit and don't. And with all the possibilities with 4 cards your hands can change from flop to the river. AAKK double is only good if you hit the flop. It is not often you see one pair win in Omaha it is the draws most players, the good ones, are after.





"All in works every time but the last time."
Back to top
Flying_Kiwi
Message Board Junkie


Joined: 03 Sep 2006
Posts: 5583
Location: Popping bubbles

PostPosted: Mon Jan 15, 2007 9:42 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

I would probably take the AAKK ds because it has better chances of making a nut hand (nut straight, nut flush, top boat, top set etc). The wrap has great deception value though, and I would probably prefer this hand if I am playing a loose Omaha player (who will still push hard with a set/two pair when theres huge draws on the board). I know I will probably get shot down for this, but I love playing hands like 7678 double suited, because you have a deceptive drawing hand plus the chance to boat-up.

I would generalise by saying the AAKK will win you more consistent small/medium pots, whereas the wrap will have to be folded more often but when it does hit you have the shot at a huge pot.
Back to top
krazyjohnny
Pair


Joined: 20 Oct 2006
Posts: 35

PostPosted: Fri Jan 19, 2007 5:20 pm    Post subject: AAKK no doubt. Reply with quote

I'll play AAKK double suited, or not, but I never raise with it from an early position. I'll usually raise with it from late position to build a big pot,, but I never want to drive players out with this hand. I want to keep players in so I can trap them later when I hit my set.
I like AAKK because it's not a trouble hand, You either hit top set,, or, you dump it. It's a hand you either win huge with, or you lose small with.

Just be careful when you hit top set and the board is connected or suited.
Back to top
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Online Poker Forum Home -> Omaha Poker All times are GMT - 4 Hours
Page 1 of 1

 


Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group