Online Poker Forum at Full Tilt Poker

HuJwang · Posted: Fri Nov 17, 2006 10:14 am Post subject: i love micros

i don't know much about omaha hi/lo but i know enough to chuckle to myself as the hand played out... names changed..

Full Tilt Poker Game #1260637872: Table Emerson - $0.25/$0.50 - Limit Omaha Hi/Lo - 10:06:05 ET - 2006/11/17
Seat 1: JLeien ($6)
Seat 2: Kent Hrbek ($35.40)
Seat 3: RedSoxFan99 ($0.30)
Seat 4: Otis_GW ($1.10)
Seat 5: LOL1 ($3.05)
Seat 6: LOL2 ($17)
Seat 7: LOL3 ($13.60)
Seat 8: HuJwang ($8.05)
Seat 9: Doc Sodom ($13.70)
LOL3 posts the small blind of $0.10
HuJwang posts the big blind of $0.25
The button is in seat #6
*** HOLE CARDS ***
Dealt to HuJwang [Kh 8h 5h Qd]
Doc Sodom folds
JLeien folds
Kent Hrbek folds
RedSoxFan99 calls $0.25
Otis_GW folds
LOL1 calls $0.25
LOL2 calls $0.25
LOL3 calls $0.15
HuJwang checks
*** FLOP *** [Jc Jh 9d]
LOL3 checks
HuJwang checks
RedSoxFan99 bets $0.05, and is all in
LOL1 folds
LOL2 folds
LOL3 folds
HuJwang calls $0.05
RedSoxFan99 shows [7h 2s As Jd]
HuJwang shows [Kh 8h 5h Qd]
*** TURN *** [Jc Jh 9d] [8s]
*** RIVER *** [Jc Jh 9d 8s] [9s]
RedSoxFan99 shows three of a kind, Jacks, for high
HuJwang shows two pair, Jacks and Eights, for high
RedSoxFan99 wins the pot ($1.30) with three of a kind, Jacks
No low hand qualified
*** SUMMARY ***
Total pot $1.35 | Rake $0.05
Board: [Jc Jh 9d 8s 9s]
Seat 1: JLeien didn't bet (folded)
Seat 2: Kent Hrbek didn't bet (folded)
Seat 3: RedSoxFan99 showed [7h 2s As Jd] and won ($1.30) with HI: three of a kind, Jacks
Seat 4: Otis_GW didn't bet (folded)
Seat 5: LOL1 folded on the Flop
Seat 6: LOL2 (button) folded on the Flop
Seat 7: LOL3 (small blind) folded on the Flop
Seat 8: HuJwang (big blind) showed [Kh 8h 5h Qd] and lost with HI: two pair, Jacks and Eights
Seat 9: Doc Sodom didn't bet (folded)

rmharris · Posted: Fri Nov 17, 2006 10:39 am Post subject:

so let me get this straight... you are making fun of them to folding to the all-in for .05 more? say if they do call then u raise.. the just put in an extra .05 for no reason if they didnt connect. i would do the same thing with people left to act behind me with absolutley nothing

HuJwang · Posted: Fri Nov 17, 2006 10:44 am Post subject:

they've got like 30:1 pot odds though.. i guess unless three people were playing only for low and have absolutely no chance of winning, but i seriously doubt that.

rmharris · Posted: Fri Nov 17, 2006 10:47 am Post subject:

Pot odds dont dictate that you have to call.. if its still against your better judgement with everyone to act after you. i would still fold with nothing there for fear of being raised. its only .05 but its my .05

boobynator · High Card Joined: 30 Sep 2006 Posts: 12

I'm afraid he's right, pot odds don't apply as much when you are not closing out the action. you were they were not and if one of them did call and you didn't consider folding you might need to find your way to a softer game like your average $10-$20 holdem table

HuJwang · Posted: Sun Nov 19, 2006 4:23 am Post subject:

so you guys both honestly believe that three people all made the right move by folding to a 5 cent bet into a 1.25 pot? again i'm not much of an omaha hi/lo player but i find it hard to think that even 1 of them made the right play (let alone all 3 of them)

	Full Tilt Poker is licensed by the Kahnawake Gaming Commission. © Copyright 2004 - 2005 FullTiltPoker.com., All Rights Reserved