| Author |
Message |
relaxedriley Royal Flush
Joined: 30 Oct 2006 Posts: 660 Location: Aurora, OR
|
Posted: Mon Nov 06, 2006 7:25 pm Post subject: strong hands in blinds many limpers |
|
|
Did a search but couldn't find this, if it has already been covered please tell me where i can find it.
when you are in the blinds and their has been no raises how would you play these hands.
PROVISIONS:
You are playing a typical .25/.50 9 handed limit game (i.e. very loose)
There are 5 limpers
If you raise no one will fold
Questions: You are in the blinds do you raise or limp with these hands?
Ak?
Aq?
JJ?
The question is, is it more profitable to just limp and check fold to a bad flop, saving yourself a bet. Because chances are with that many people in the pot these hands are no good on a bad flop. Or do you try to build a pot for when you do hit so that you will get max value out of these hands. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
BOYNAMEDSUE Moderator
Joined: 27 Jun 2005 Posts: 7403 Location: Toronto
|
Posted: Mon Nov 06, 2006 7:28 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| With a really strong hand, raise to get more money in the pot. With AK, AQ or JJ just limp. If you're in the SB you might get the BB to fold, but that's about it. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Riddim Moderator
Joined: 04 Dec 2005 Posts: 7329 Location: Quitting smoking
|
Posted: Mon Nov 06, 2006 7:42 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| People who aren't raising with all those hands in a game like that are costing themselves so much money. Just ask yourself if you think your hand has a better than 5:1 shot at winning the pot against the nearly random hands of your opponents. If the answer is yes, you should probably raise. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Paprika Full House
Joined: 09 Feb 2006 Posts: 194
|
Posted: Mon Nov 06, 2006 9:00 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| If it were me I'd Raise Raise Raisewith all three. Some say limp with AQ but I never do. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
cardfish2 Straight Flush
Joined: 31 Oct 2006 Posts: 482 Location: Michigan
|
Posted: Mon Nov 06, 2006 9:07 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| You always raise if you think you have the best hand. (Straight out of Sklansky.) |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
bigwheell Royal Flush
Joined: 27 Apr 2006 Posts: 830 Location: North Dakota
|
Posted: Mon Nov 06, 2006 9:37 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Riddim wrote: |
| People who aren't raising with all those hands in a game like that are costing themselves so much money. Just ask yourself if you think your hand has a better than 5:1 shot at winning the pot against the nearly random hands of your opponents. If the answer is yes, you should probably raise. |
I have to agree with Riddims theory here...
In the long run you should be a winner with all of those hands if played correctly...Raise for value from the blinds. I probably raise from the blinds 80% of the time with the hands mentioned in the original post. I will almost alway reraise with them if it is two bets to me. There are certain times I will slowplay against LP raisers, but that is for another column... |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
griffinlord Message Board Junkie
Joined: 20 Jul 2005 Posts: 2454 Location: The Great Plains of South Dakota
|
Posted: Tue Nov 07, 2006 12:03 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Raise 'em!
I used to think that preflop raising was about thining the field, maybe getting heads up. But that is NL thinking.
In micro limit you are trying to build a pot preflop with big hands so you have something worth winning.
True, AK, AQ, JJ may all have to be folded if the flop comes scary, but what happens if you are holding AQ and the flop comes QQ4? Even the loosest player will hesitate to call a bet on that flop.
True, on some flops you'll get called down by someone with a bad hand who is actually making a correct play based on pot odds, but you are still beating them most of the time and winning more than you lose. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
relaxedriley Royal Flush
Joined: 30 Oct 2006 Posts: 660 Location: Aurora, OR
|
Posted: Tue Nov 07, 2006 7:05 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Thanks to all who answered, I still am not sure what the correct play is but at least now I know im not alone in my current thinking. I will continue raising in these spots unless Poker office shows me difinative gaps in these situations over the long haul. If so I will post my conclusions. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
meitiner Pair
Joined: 11 Aug 2005 Posts: 21
|
Posted: Wed Nov 08, 2006 8:04 am Post subject: |
|
|
Think about it this way.
Your pocket is favorite to win, not a dead cert but better than the 6 to 1 odd that the table is paying. If it was a horse race and you could get those odds on the favorite then you would want to bet as much as you could. That is why you raise.
If you have aces you will win 30-40% of the time against 5 players and they are giving you 6-1 odds, over a lifetime of poker that will be a fortune. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
fire_eyes_2k The Burn Card
Joined: 18 Jan 2006 Posts: 3345 Location: Old York
|
Posted: Wed Nov 08, 2006 9:05 am Post subject: |
|
|
| I gotta agree with those that said raise. Raise all the hands to get max. value out of your hand. With that many limpers, if you hold AK or AQ, you will often get weaker aces calling all the way to a showdown. JJ is a harder one to play postflop, as theres a ~50% chance an overcard will hit the flop, and with 5 limpers, I'd expect to be facing at least 2 overcards if not all 3. And keep on firing if the flop looks good! |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
craigo6x Message Board Junkie
Joined: 30 Oct 2006 Posts: 2610 Location: 1st Place
|
Posted: Wed Nov 08, 2006 9:12 am Post subject: |
|
|
The real answer is it depends on you. If you can get away from the hand if you miss, then raise. One more small bet builds a nice pot, that if you hit will pay nicely. However if once you raise you feel you are committed and can't fold AK on a board of 8,9, 10, Q, K then keep your investment at a minimum and take the flop.
Problem is a raise out of the blind is supposed to signify a big hand, but I watched some donk 4 bet from the BB preflop with an os J 10 yesterday. Unless I know I have the best hand (or likely the best or race hand) and I know I can get away from it, I don't raise preflop. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
deadmoney314 Message Board Junkie
Joined: 16 Jul 2005 Posts: 3226 Location: grunching through reply posts
|
Posted: Wed Nov 08, 2006 11:15 am Post subject: |
|
|
| craigo6x wrote: |
The real answer is it depends on you. If you can get away from the hand if you miss, then raise. One more small bet builds a nice pot, that if you hit will pay nicely. However if once you raise you feel you are committed and can't fold AK on a board of 8,9, 10, Q, K then keep your investment at a minimum and take the flop.
Problem is a raise out of the blind is supposed to signify a big hand, but I watched some donk 4 bet from the BB preflop with an os J 10 yesterday. Unless I know I have the best hand (or likely the best or race hand) and I know I can get away from it, I don't raise preflop. |
I think this is a case of positive reinforcement of a bad habit. If you have had a few bad experiences raising these hands out of the blinds, it can easily trick you into making long term -EV plays such as not raising these hands in an unraised small stakes pot. There are very good passages in small stakes hold'em (for those of you who's interest have been sparked in the book) that explain exactly why you need to raise these hands in a loose game because of the "deadmoney" added to the pot. It simply equates to more variance & bigger returns. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Paprika Full House
Joined: 09 Feb 2006 Posts: 194
|
Posted: Wed Nov 08, 2006 12:19 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| So far, it has only happened to me one time at the lower limit that my utg raise with anything was folded all the way back to me. That is rare in LLHE I think. It happened to be with AA and I took the blinds but that is the exception. Especially when somebody has any ace or face card and is dying to see the flop. Think about all the times that you are folding with bad starting hands. Hopefully a good amount if you are playing somwhat well. When the premies come along which isn't all the time you have to get max value for them. I equate it to stud hi-You have to bet & raise those live big pairs in stud cause they don't come along a lot either. There is more to this game than just that but the point is that when you get em, bet em imo. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
craigo6x Message Board Junkie
Joined: 30 Oct 2006 Posts: 2610 Location: 1st Place
|
Posted: Wed Nov 08, 2006 2:28 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| deadmoney314 wrote: |
| craigo6x wrote: |
The real answer is it depends on you. If you can get away from the hand if you miss, then raise. One more small bet builds a nice pot, that if you hit will pay nicely. However if once you raise you feel you are committed and can't fold AK on a board of 8,9, 10, Q, K then keep your investment at a minimum and take the flop.
Problem is a raise out of the blind is supposed to signify a big hand, but I watched some donk 4 bet from the BB preflop with an os J 10 yesterday. Unless I know I have the best hand (or likely the best or race hand) and I know I can get away from it, I don't raise preflop. |
I think this is a case of positive reinforcement of a bad habit. If you have had a few bad experiences raising these hands out of the blinds, it can easily trick you into making long term -EV plays such as not raising these hands in an unraised small stakes pot. There are very good passages in small stakes hold'em (for those of you who's interest have been sparked in the book) that explain exactly why you need to raise these hands in a loose game because of the "deadmoney" added to the pot. It simply equates to more variance & bigger returns. |
Actually I do very well playing from many positions playing at stakes up to $7.50-$15. What I do know is noone is going to fold to one raise and you do not want to take AA against 6 hands. If given the chance, I prefer three betting from OOP. But if the pot is unraised and 5 have limped in, all I'm doing is taking a big hand against 5 players from OOP and unless I flop a set or better i am now the dead money. I don't want to build a pot with a hand I can't get away from. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
craigo6x Message Board Junkie
Joined: 30 Oct 2006 Posts: 2610 Location: 1st Place
|
Posted: Wed Nov 08, 2006 4:07 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| meitiner wrote: |
Think about it this way.
Your pocket is favorite to win, not a dead cert but better than the 6 to 1 odd that the table is paying. If it was a horse race and you could get those odds on the favorite then you would want to bet as much as you could. That is why you raise.
If you have aces you will win 30-40% of the time against 5 players and they are giving you 6-1 odds, over a lifetime of poker that will be a fortune. |
This is my point. with Aces against 4 other opponents you are a 40% favorite to win the hand. That is less than 1/2 the time you will win. Now 4 players limp and you have AsAd. Your opponents:
KhQh: 15.27%
6d5d:19.24%
8s8c:14.86%
AcKc 9.44%
Assuming these players limp in, you now hold the best starting hand. However, when you raise preflop you have now guaranteed action until the river because this is still a game of pot odds. If the game is 2-4 and the sb folds, if you raise from the BB the pot contains $21. Bet the flop and now there is $31 preflop. Each of these players probably now has correct odds to go to the river as they are getting 7-1 or better.
By not raising preflop, first you have not built a pot that you can't get away from and second, assuming a flop bet the pot is now only $21 on the turn, and if you bet the turn, the pot is laying 6-1 and these guys may not mathematically be correct in calling (even though in no fold em holdem they are calling if they are an 11-1 dog) |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|