Online Poker Room
Our Poker Players
Texas Hold Em Download
How To Play Poker
Full Tilt Poker
Real Money Poker Games
News & Promotions
Poker Store
Online Poker Affiliates
Full Tilt Poker
Online Poker Forum at Full Tilt Poker
  FAQFAQ   SearchSearch    RegisterRegister   ProfileProfile  Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages  Log inLog in 

Online Poker Forum - unethical stalling in ironman freeroll
Goto page 1, 2  Next
 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Online Poker Forum Home -> General Discussion
Author Message
pitka
High Card


Joined: 07 Oct 2006
Posts: 14

PostPosted: Sat Oct 07, 2006 5:59 pm    Post subject: unethical stalling in ironman freeroll Reply with quote

In the ironman freeroll of October 7th, player gavinz1970 won a few chips early and then began stalling by using the full allotment of time to fold every hand. He began this tactic very early in the tournament when the blinds were still 30/60. He had about 2600 chips, which would be more than enough to make the money by using this tactic. This places many other players at a disadvantage as we get to play fewer hands before the blinds increase. It's also very annoying and IMO unethical. He was asked to stop but continued to stall every single hand. I have reported him to support as this sort of behaviour should not be allowed. What do you all think of this?
Back to top
doubledownA
Banned


Joined: 02 Sep 2005
Posts: 3323

PostPosted: Sat Oct 07, 2006 6:03 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

technically he has as the ability to utilize his full run alotment of time, I dont really see a problem with his tactic...It may be a bit overboard, but not illegal by anymeans.
Back to top
pitka
High Card


Joined: 07 Oct 2006
Posts: 14

PostPosted: Sat Oct 07, 2006 6:10 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

It's an angle. From the web: "The Official Dictionary of Poker": defines "angle" as: "A maneuver, usually on the border of legaility and illegality (but usually clearly unethical) to take unfair advantage...."

This behaviour is clearly unethical. Meanwhile he's playing normally on a NL table so we know it's not a connection problem.


Last edited by pitka on Sat Oct 07, 2006 9:20 pm; edited 1 time in total
Back to top
pitka
High Card


Joined: 07 Oct 2006
Posts: 14

PostPosted: Sat Oct 07, 2006 7:26 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Update: He barely made the money after stalling on every hand for well over an hour. Then he went all in and I called with a 63o and knocked him out.
Back to top
SlySelea
Straight Flush


Joined: 23 Jun 2005
Posts: 422
Location: New Buffalo, MI

PostPosted: Sat Oct 07, 2006 8:52 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Goldy Wilson all over again. During that turny a long time ago support actually came to the table and scolded him for his play, but he kept doing it anyway with no penalty that I was ever aware of. He finished second in this 100k guarantee, I think it was and if I remember correctly.
Back to top
pitka
High Card


Joined: 07 Oct 2006
Posts: 14

PostPosted: Sun Oct 08, 2006 3:03 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Nothing from support so far. This guy should be disqualified and his winnings in the tourny forfeited. Otherwise, full tilt is sending a message that you can abuse the rules and play unethically and they don't care. Rules can never be written in such a clear manner that there aren't holes for people to abuse. That's where common sense and judgment come into play. Any person who takes the maximum time to fold 100% of his hands for over an hour is clearly abusing the rules and putting everyone at his table at a disadvantage. We were only able to play half as many hands as everyone else in the tournament. I do hope this incident isn't brushed aside and ignored by those in charge. This was a $30,000 tournament after all.
Back to top
junkbutton
Message Board Junkie


Joined: 17 Feb 2006
Posts: 4043
Location: Gutterrock, NY

PostPosted: Sun Oct 08, 2006 3:12 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

pitka wrote:
This guy should be disqualified and his winnings in the tourny forfeited.


If they do this, I will never play at Full Tilt again.

I can understand your frustration, but he has every right to play however he chooses within the rules. This, I believe he did.
Back to top
pitka
High Card


Joined: 07 Oct 2006
Posts: 14

PostPosted: Sun Oct 08, 2006 3:31 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Leave then. I doubt you'll be missed if you support this sort of unethical bend the rules sort of play.
Back to top
junkbutton
Message Board Junkie


Joined: 17 Feb 2006
Posts: 4043
Location: Gutterrock, NY

PostPosted: Sun Oct 08, 2006 4:27 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

pitka wrote:
Leave then. I doubt you'll be missed if you support this sort of unethical bend the rules sort of play.


Well, as long as everyone plays the way YOU want them to play... Give me a break. You don't like the way someone plays, so you report them to support? I tried to sympathize. I'm not saying you shouldn't feel frustrated or even angry about it. But it is within their rights, and the rules of the game. If Full Tilt was to take one penny from that guys account because you don't like the way he plays, that would be atrocious. This guy paid his way into the tournament just like everyone else, and he's given an allotted amount of time to make his play just like everyone else. He doesn't have to play the same way you or anyone else plays. He gets to play his way. That's what's cool about this game. There's no one way to play. There's a gazillion ways to play. He does what's right for him, you do what's right for you. We all get that choice. Or at least we did, until pitka decided that he gets to choose how other people play. Give me a break... Play my way or I report you... How's that for sportsmanship?

And to be clear, I don't 'support this type of play. I support people's right to play their way.
Back to top
Jobe Gilchrist
Message Board Junkie


Joined: 09 Apr 2006
Posts: 3446
Location: "the most commonly-uttered phrase by vampire bats is 'it's not as cool as it sounds'"

PostPosted: Sun Oct 08, 2006 5:02 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Oh come on, try to think about this with just a little depth, instead of finding a nice platitude like "so people should play like YOU want them to play?" and humping it for a few paragraphs.

When the way that somebody wants to play is clearly unethical and detracts from everyone else's experience, maybe we should actually think about whether that sort of play should be allowed, and if not, take measures to prevent it. I know, it's a bit harder than just putting your hands over your ears and yelling "EVERYONE IS ENTITLED TO PLAY POKER HOWEVER THEY WANT AS LONG AS THE SOFTWARE ALLOWS IT", but it's okay to actually solve a problem every once in a while, instead of just waving your hands until it doesn't look like a problem anymore.

There is no perfect analogy to this, and invoking an analogy among random people who may or may not know how to think is a recipe for disaster, since they'll just attack the analogy and think they're attacking the argument. Fck it, let's live on the edge a bit, woohooo, here goes: If I fill up the chat window with obscenities, the software is allowing me to do it, but a quick letter to support will revoke that privilege. I can play with a couple buddies and IM them my hands; nothing in the FTP software is saying "you can't play this way", but it's unethical, unethical enough to warrant making a rule about it.

If anybody stalled like that at a cash game, the table would clear out. In a home game, people would kick them out of the house. But oh no, this is a tournament, and we're all stuck here, so now the douchebag can wreack havoc? No, now we can figure out how to stop that from happening. See? Now we're solutions-oriented! You're making great progress.

Meet me in the conference room, let's brainstorm; I'm interested in what you have to say (just kidding), suggestions:

1. Move to a time bank system where, if you go beyond 15 seconds, you start pulling from the bank. Once the bank is gone, it's gone, or it can be renewed each hour, whatever. This at least makes stalling much less effective.

2. Figure out a way to identify somebody who is doing this and change their abilities, much like with the chat ban. If someone is timing out or hitting that threshhold you set x times in y period of time, then they're "on notice", and their timing system is changed temporarily. Perhaps you only get 15 seconds to act, something like that. That's a pretty tough penalty, to be sure, and it's going to be imposed on schmucks who play with a horrible internet connection as well as unethical players, but that's the price you pay. Both types are annoying as hell for everyone else to play with.

If anything, this is more important than banning chat, since I can either turn off chat or mute any player I want. And it all feeds the bottom line: a better experience means more players playing more often. $$$!
Back to top
junkbutton
Message Board Junkie


Joined: 17 Feb 2006
Posts: 4043
Location: Gutterrock, NY

PostPosted: Sun Oct 08, 2006 5:15 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

I don't disagree with anything that you said, Jobe (unless you took some shots at me in all those big words somewhere... Than I'd have to). My point above anything else, is if this guy didn't break any rules, no money should be taken from his account.

Do you really think that it's feasable that someone should have to play the game with different rules (or abilities as you mentioned) than somone else?
Back to top
The_OG_Rocco
Royal Flush


Joined: 31 May 2006
Posts: 742
Location: Texas

PostPosted: Sun Oct 08, 2006 6:34 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Jobe Gilchrist wrote:
Oh come on, try to think about this with just a little depth, instead of finding a nice platitude like "so people should play like YOU want them to play?" and humping it for a few paragraphs.

When the way that somebody wants to play is clearly unethical and detracts from everyone else's experience, maybe we should actually think about whether that sort of play should be allowed, and if not, take measures to prevent it. I know, it's a bit harder than just putting your hands over your ears and yelling "EVERYONE IS ENTITLED TO PLAY POKER HOWEVER THEY WANT AS LONG AS THE SOFTWARE ALLOWS IT", but it's okay to actually solve a problem every once in a while, instead of just waving your hands until it doesn't look like a problem anymore.

There is no perfect analogy to this, and invoking an analogy among random people who may or may not know how to think is a recipe for disaster, since they'll just attack the analogy and think they're attacking the argument. Fck it, let's live on the edge a bit, woohooo, here goes: If I fill up the chat window with obscenities, the software is allowing me to do it, but a quick letter to support will revoke that privilege. I can play with a couple buddies and IM them my hands; nothing in the FTP software is saying "you can't play this way", but it's unethical, unethical enough to warrant making a rule about it.

If anybody stalled like that at a cash game, the table would clear out. In a home game, people would kick them out of the house. But oh no, this is a tournament, and we're all stuck here, so now the douchebag can wreack havoc? No, now we can figure out how to stop that from happening. See? Now we're solutions-oriented! You're making great progress.

Meet me in the conference room, let's brainstorm; I'm interested in what you have to say (just kidding), suggestions:

1. Move to a time bank system where, if you go beyond 15 seconds, you start pulling from the bank. Once the bank is gone, it's gone, or it can be renewed each hour, whatever. This at least makes stalling much less effective.

2. Figure out a way to identify somebody who is doing this and change their abilities, much like with the chat ban. If someone is timing out or hitting that threshhold you set x times in y period of time, then they're "on notice", and their timing system is changed temporarily. Perhaps you only get 15 seconds to act, something like that. That's a pretty tough penalty, to be sure, and it's going to be imposed on schmucks who play with a horrible internet connection as well as unethical players, but that's the price you pay. Both types are annoying as hell for everyone else to play with.

If anything, this is more important than banning chat, since I can either turn off chat or mute any player I want. And it all feeds the bottom line: a better experience means more players playing more often. $$$!



I can't believe that I am going to say this......But you are right on the money on this point Jobe. Bravo.
Back to top
Jobe Gilchrist
Message Board Junkie


Joined: 09 Apr 2006
Posts: 3446
Location: "the most commonly-uttered phrase by vampire bats is 'it's not as cool as it sounds'"

PostPosted: Sun Oct 08, 2006 10:48 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Oh my gosh, I saw your name at the end and said to myself "here we go again..." Much respect for being able to say you agree even though you think I'm the antichrist Smile
Back to top
Honest_Rob
Postmaster General


Joined: 21 Jul 2005
Posts: 5663
Location: trying to get back to even

PostPosted: Sun Oct 08, 2006 11:15 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

junkbutton wrote:
pitka wrote:
This guy should be disqualified and his winnings in the tourny forfeited.


If they do this, I will never play at Full Tilt again.

I can understand your frustration, but he has every right to play however he chooses within the rules. This, I believe he did.


Agreed. This would be annoying but you can't suspend someone or make them forfeit their winnings. This situation is on par with someone sitting out and and making the money. In either case the money is there's to keep. In any event there is a big difference between unethical and illegal.
Back to top
pitka
High Card


Joined: 07 Oct 2006
Posts: 14

PostPosted: Mon Oct 09, 2006 1:28 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Honest_Rob wrote:
This situation is on par with someone sitting out and and making the money. In either case the money is there's to keep. In any event there is a big difference between unethical and illegal.


It's not at all "on par with someone sitting out." This is stalling not sitting out. Huge difference. He'd be thrown out of any live tournament for doing what he did. All you people hiding behind the "it's within the rules" argument need to get a clue. Unethical means that the action is outside of acceptable behaviour. It is wrong. Written rules cannot cover every circumstance. You could make the rules 200 pages long and people would still find loopholes and angles to shoot. That's why we have tournament directors and give them discretion to make decisions "that are final in all matters." That's why we have rules like rule No. 1 at full tilt: "Sportsmanlike conduct is expected of all users." Is what gavinz1970 did sportsmanlike?
Back to top
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Online Poker Forum Home -> General Discussion All times are GMT - 4 Hours
Goto page 1, 2  Next
Page 1 of 2

 


Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group