Online Poker Room
Our Poker Players
Texas Hold Em Download
How To Play Poker
Full Tilt Poker
Real Money Poker Games
News & Promotions
Poker Store
Online Poker Affiliates
Full Tilt Poker
Online Poker Forum at Full Tilt Poker
  FAQFAQ   SearchSearch    RegisterRegister   ProfileProfile  Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages  Log inLog in 

Online Poker Forum - Correct play with KK?

 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Online Poker Forum Home -> Multi-Table Tournament Poker
Author Message
chalmer
High Card


Joined: 07 Sep 2005
Posts: 2
Location: Corona, CA

PostPosted: Wed Sep 07, 2005 4:34 pm    Post subject: Correct play with KK? Reply with quote

This hand took place in a $25 buy-in NL Hold'em tournament at Pechanga Casino. It was still early in the game with the blinds increasing only once to $50-$100. I had close to my starting stack of $2500 in chips when I was dealt Kc Kd in late position. The player under the gun raised to $350 and every one folded to me. I reraised to $700 and only the original raiser called. The pot was now at $1550. The flop came 8 high with 2 clubs. My opponent immediately went all-in with slightly more chips than I had. I put him on a good pocket pair like Jacks with an outside chance he might have Aces. I quickly called and he turned over Ac Jc. He had one over card and a nut flush draw where as I had a made hand. Honestly, I didn't like to see him with that hand because I was only about 57% to win. Unfortunately he hit his flush and I lost. Did I play this hand correctly throughout or was there something I could have done better?
Back to top
Zuchov
Royal Flush


Joined: 29 Jun 2005
Posts: 646

PostPosted: Wed Sep 07, 2005 4:37 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

You did fine. I just want to point out that by only re-raising the min raise, you give your opponent the proper odds to call you with almost two cards, so don't do that unless you have a hand that's strong enough to handle giving those odds... and KK is such a hand.
Back to top
CoolFin69
Flush


Joined: 24 Aug 2005
Posts: 126

PostPosted: Wed Sep 07, 2005 6:28 pm    Post subject: Re: Reply with quote

Zuchov wrote:
You did fine. I just want to point out that by only re-raising the min raise, you give your opponent the proper odds to call you with almost two cards, so don't do that unless you have a hand that's strong enough to handle giving those odds... and KK is such a hand.


I agree with the min raise not being appropriate preflop but disagree that Ks are strong enough to withstand this forced automatic call...

I don't really think any hand is worth that preflop with As and Ks being no exception... According to Doyle's SS books, he and I feel the same way about this (I didn't read it until this month for some strange reason) that we'd basically rather have the small suited connectors than the As or Ks in this spot. In fact, if we're in his spot we're HOPING to get re-raised so if we hit the flop we can bet into the raiser, get re-raised and get all the chips in the pot with either a shot or a lock to break him.

The fact that what he actually had was AJc needs to be overlooked because too often people focus on outcomes and hindsight rather than theory and the game which is what you're asking about to know what to do next time when you (once again) don't know what your opponent has...

You gave him automatic odds preflop where he could basically call you even if he was bluffing with 27o just in case he hits trips or 2 pair on flop and thinks they're good...
And then you're only going to get called with any moves you make after that with hands that either have you beat or can beat you. That's what ended up happening... unless he is a crazy internet player, he probably couldn't call a big push preflop, and your (bigger than minimum) bet might get you at least SOME information on the relative strength of his hand...

If you push strongly preflop (as I'd think appropriate here) and don't get called, so be it... you are certainly better off than you were before the hand, you weren't going to fold the Ks preflop anyway and you keep from losing your ass early in the tourney... he had good odds on that flop he figured so you can't totally fault him for the call and realize, as you said, that's poker... time for the next game

Please let me know, though, if in the future you push all-in early in the tourney with the Ks and get called by the initial raiser who has a hand like this AJc and you still get outdrawn by the flush... I like to proven wrong, it is how I try to learn Very Happy
Back to top
Zuchov
Royal Flush


Joined: 29 Jun 2005
Posts: 646

PostPosted: Wed Sep 07, 2005 7:05 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

This could be interesting... I'll respond later... must go drink.
Back to top
goomlah
Royal Flush


Joined: 08 Sep 2005
Posts: 561
Location: Chicago

PostPosted: Thu Sep 08, 2005 10:45 am    Post subject: KK Reply with quote

If there is one thing Most people tend to do online that is just the worst thing you could possibly do, and that's raise the minimum. Now, raising all-in seems a little hard fetched, but half your stack would seem a more appropriate raise. He's not nearly as priced in if he wants to gamble. I know this was not online but a lot of people do this in a multi-table online tourney as well. It just will not work out long run
Back to top
Zuchov
Royal Flush


Joined: 29 Jun 2005
Posts: 646

PostPosted: Thu Sep 08, 2005 7:21 pm    Post subject: Re: Reply with quote

[Double post... damn you length limit!]

Last edited by Zuchov on Thu Sep 08, 2005 7:23 pm; edited 1 time in total
Back to top
Zuchov
Royal Flush


Joined: 29 Jun 2005
Posts: 646

PostPosted: Thu Sep 08, 2005 7:21 pm    Post subject: Re: Reply with quote

[Triple post... damn you, length limit!]

Last edited by Zuchov on Thu Sep 08, 2005 7:22 pm; edited 1 time in total
Back to top
Zuchov
Royal Flush


Joined: 29 Jun 2005
Posts: 646

PostPosted: Thu Sep 08, 2005 7:22 pm    Post subject: Re: Reply with quote

[Had to snip out your quote to make the length limit]

OK, well the basic reason I think it's appropriate for the min reraise here is that doing so essentially pot commits chalmer (on the flop, he has enough left to make one pot sized bet). So it's really kind of a stop and go move, but one that the other player may be able to call with the weaker type of holding we really want to be up against anyway. This is good because chalmer has a very nice spot to double up here with his KK, and therefore improve his odds early in the tournament. Given the range of hands that his opponent could have making that preflop raise (which is quite large), I think we want him to see a flop. The odds of an opponent flopping 2 pair is 2.2%, provided he has two unpaired cards, the odds of hitting that ace (assuming they're all live) is 18%, and the odds of flopping a set is also 12%, if he indeed does have a pair. What's much more likely to happen is that his opponent will hit a flop that either doesn't help him (allowing chalmer to pick up a valuable ~850 chips), or looks good, but is actually inferior to chalmer's KK, allowing him to double up as a favorite.

I also honestly think that any hand that is somewhat dangerous to chalmer (such as a strong A or a strong pair) will call the all in anyway, given that this is a $25 buy in tourney. A hand that wouldn't call the all (like a high suited connector, or strong paint) is one we want to see the flop, given the low odds it has of flopping something better than KK. What we're more likely to see here is a case where the guy is playing that suited connector, flops a draw (or top pair) and is therefore capable of calling an all in, giving chalmer a ~70% chance of a double up.

My preference in this spot is to make the play that helps us double up the most often, becoming an early chip leader and giving all the benefits of that situation, rather than waiting until we've invested more time into the tourney and face a tough spot where we bust out of the money anyway. In an MTT, I'd rather place last than bust on the bubble - money or go home, and figure out which one it's gonna be early on. Therefore, any moves you can make early to increase your chip stack are good moves, in my mind, because they either let you play from a bigger stack, or leave before wasting much more time for a finish out of the money anyway.

My 2c.
Back to top
CoolFin69
Flush


Joined: 24 Aug 2005
Posts: 126

PostPosted: Tue Sep 13, 2005 10:12 am    Post subject: Re: Reply with quote

Zuchov wrote:
[Had to snip out your quote to make the length limit]

OK, well the basic reason I think it's appropriate for the min reraise here is that doing so essentially pot commits chalmer (on the flop, he has enough left to make one pot sized bet). So it's really kind of a stop and go move, but one that the other player may be able to call with the weaker type of holding we really want to be up against anyway. This is good because chalmer has a very nice spot to double up here with his KK, and therefore improve his odds early in the tournament. Given the range of hands that his opponent could have making that preflop raise (which is quite large), I think we want him to see a flop. The odds of an opponent flopping 2 pair is 2.2%, provided he has two unpaired cards, the odds of hitting that ace (assuming they're all live) is 18%, and the odds of flopping a set is also 12%, if he indeed does have a pair. What's much more likely to happen is that his opponent will hit a flop that either doesn't help him (allowing chalmer to pick up a valuable ~850 chips), or looks good, but is actually inferior to chalmer's KK, allowing him to double up as a favorite.

I also honestly think that any hand that is somewhat dangerous to chalmer (such as a strong A or a strong pair) will call the all in anyway, given that this is a $25 buy in tourney. A hand that wouldn't call the all (like a high suited connector, or strong paint) is one we want to see the flop, given the low odds it has of flopping something better than KK. What we're more likely to see here is a case where the guy is playing that suited connector, flops a draw (or top pair) and is therefore capable of calling an all in, giving chalmer a ~70% chance of a double up.

My preference in this spot is to make the play that helps us double up the most often, becoming an early chip leader and giving all the benefits of that situation, rather than waiting until we've invested more time into the tourney and face a tough spot where we bust out of the money anyway. In an MTT, I'd rather place last than bust on the bubble - money or go home, and figure out which one it's gonna be early on. Therefore, any moves you can make early to increase your chip stack are good moves, in my mind, because they either let you play from a bigger stack, or leave before wasting much more time for a finish out of the money anyway.

My 2c.


...that pretty much just shows you're new school... I guess I'm just old school... I'll post my response (with quotes from Doyle) in a few...
Back to top
CoolFin69
Flush


Joined: 24 Aug 2005
Posts: 126

PostPosted: Tue Sep 13, 2005 10:42 am    Post subject: Doyle says Reply with quote

"At the early levels of a no-limit tournament, I perfer playing extremely tight. I don't try to force the action. I just win what the cards allow me to win as safely as possible.
...
My main thought at these early levels is on the value of the chips, since their value now is much higher than it will be later on. If you advance far enough, the antes and blinds will exceed all the chips you have in front of you early in the tournament. Play the early levels, especially the first two levels, carefully and try to avoid the all-in, coin-flip hands."

Now some people might say he is advocating what you guys are talking about and not what I said... but I don't think so.

You said Chalmer is basically pot committed with 700 of his 2500 in the pot with JUST Kings... is he going to call an ace flop? ...is he going to call 3 to the flush on board? Maybe not... but he certainly is calling or moving all-in against 2 to flush on board which is what happened here...

But does he make the same move against 9-T-x? Maybe the guy made a semi-bluff with 9Ts preflop and then had an automatic call to see the flop. Now he hits top 2 pair and figures his hand is good because the re-raiser having 99 or TT is highly unlikely and he doesn't expect that move either with xx (the baby set)... So he figures he's only called now by a dog who has an overpair or 4 to a straight... if there could be 4 to a flush he might not move in since all newbies love the 4 to flush CALL and not just the BET/RAISE... So he moves in expecting to have the best of it and knowing Chalmer would be drawing if he calls... in which case it'd be KK versus 9s & 10s going to the turn.... I know which I'd prefer to have in that situation.

So, okay, it wasn't a 9-T-x flop, it was an 8 high flop... but small suited connectors that just hit 2 pair are VERY likely as well as 4 to flush and straight draws... while lots of newbies seem to fall in love with the Ace Baby, does he really want to call all-in with bottom or middle pair with no redraws except to his ace for 2 pair?? I doubt it. MAYBE he'd call with A8, but not if he is any good. If he is a decent player, he'd have to EXPECT that you made a VALUE raise with a painted pair and would only call with 2 pair or better (including set, made str8/flush or 4 to the flush)... I'm not sure 4 to the straight is worth the call, but would've been worth a bet or reraise certainly.


My point might not be totally obvious in what I'm saying....
basically it is this:
The New School way of thinking is test the tourney early and often to try to jump out to a lead and then play your game with less concern of going broke. Fine.
The New School way of thinking is to make "value" bets & raises that get a smaller increase of money in the pot preflop in the hopes of giving odds to call both pre and post flop with weaker hands. Okay... there is reasoning for when to make such a move and when not to IMO, but generally I don't like it... The thing is, though, if you REGULARLY make moves like this you're basically no longer allowed to **** when you get outdrawn. Your whole strategy relies on giving your opponent odds with 2 cards to come. You pretty much blackmail him into a preflop call in the hopes you'll get called again on the flop. When the turn or the river sends you packing (as it should do 1 out of 4 times if you are 75% on the flop) please cry on someone else's shoulder.

Thank you. Very Happy
Back to top
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Online Poker Forum Home -> Multi-Table Tournament Poker All times are GMT - 4 Hours
Page 1 of 1

 


Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group