DevilfishFan Royal Flush
Joined: 09 Sep 2005 Posts: 906
|
Posted: Sun Jun 18, 2006 6:20 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Jaconda78 wrote: |
Reading this, I became curious. To the batmobile (or pokertracker, as the case may be)!
Looking at my stats for limit hold em from $0.25/$0.50 up to $30/$60, I find that my 4 most profitable hands, in BB/hand, are, in order:
1)KK (2.12 BB/hand)
2)AA (2.11 BB/hand)
3)QTs (2.10 BB/hand) - strange, I don't really know WHAT'S going on here
4)99 (1.66 BB/hand)
My 4 least profitable hands are:
1) 77 (-1.55 BB/hand) - 3 very huge full house v full house hands and 5 set over set hands are largely responsible for this hand;
2) J9s (-1.41 BB/hand) - dont ask, I have no good excuse for this one
3) JTs (-1.23 BB/hand) - again, this should be massively profitable but isnt - ugh
4) KQs (-0.85 BB/hand) - this is a case of it being difficult to get value when I have the best hand, and being dominated a bit too often. I feel the need to mention that in NL, KQs is VERY profitable for me (1.29 BB/hand at limits $0.50/$1.00 up to $10.00/$20.00 NL)
A few points: 1)big pairs are still by far my biggest winners. 2)honestly, I'm a bit upset - JTs and J9s should NOT be my biggest losers. Clearly I'm misplaying them somehow, and if I ever go back to limit, I'm gonna have to figure out these very large leaks; 3) I don't REALLY have enough hands here for a great analysis - only 6,000 hands across many limits. However, I think it's a decent basic analysis.
I want to point out that I have made a fair amount of money at limit, including my first several thousand over at party poker, made playing 2/4 limit. And the biggest earners are the aces and kings - you just need to have the roll to ride out the swings and suckouts. |
The thing that comes to mind with the J-9 and J-10 is getting into kicker trouble when you hit top pair.
Like you said though. 6,000 hands. |
|