| Author |
Message |
Zarken_Ventreth Full House
Joined: 09 May 2009 Posts: 160 Location: High in the Mountains
|
Posted: Fri Jun 19, 2009 10:11 am Post subject: Full Tilt Bans OPR from posting player rankings!!!! |
|
|
Message to All,
I just logged onto OPR (Official Poker Rankings) and the following message came up:
| Quote: |
"ATTN: Full Tilt Poker (FTP) has demanded us to remove all FTP tournaments and player statistics from Official Poker Rankings (OPR) because they suddenly decided that OPR "gives players an unfair advantage" and works "very similar to how a shared hand history database works".
We don't believe OPR gives players an unfair advantage. OPR is a free site available to all players and in our opinion any player should be allowed to use OPR to follow their progress, for stacking, collusion detection, community discussions, competitions and to see how they are doing in comparison to other poker players.
All the data we collect is publicly viewable at the end of each tournament in the tournament lobby. We do not collect hand histories nor do we provide access to any hand history information. OPR has nothing to do with a shared hand history database.
We have proposed Full Tilt Poker different solutions to keep FTP tournaments on OPR and we hope they will reverse their decision and help us clear this misunderstanding soon. But for now we have decided to follow their demands to remove all FTP tournaments on OPR.
Your opinion matters.
We strongly encourage you to forward your opinion about this to support@fulltiltpoker.com
We would also like to hear your comments and feedback. Please forward to ftpfeedback@officialpokerrankings.com
- Please forward a link if you are posting about this on an open forum / message board. Thank you.
We apologize for the inconvenience.
Official Poker Rankings" |
I believe this to be out of line. As is stated in the post regarding the lack of hand histories for any player in the OPR database as well as other shared information... I find no reason for this ban. I encourage others to join in the support of OPR by contacting support@fulltiltpoker to voice your displeasure with this decision.
OPR has always had multiple banner advertisements (yes... I know that they make a few cents for each referral) for Full Tilt and the bonus that is being offered at the time. I have used it mainly as a way to track my own play and to see where my game is strong or where it is lacking in terms of the types of games played, ITM percentages, ROI, etc.
I would like an explanation from Full Tilt as to why this decision was made but will not get any response of substance unless there are a large number of inquiries asking the same question.
What do you all think? Is this fair? Did OPR give you any fair or unfair advantages with the stats they provided?
I would really like to hear other's opinions on this matter.
Thank you and best of luck to all!
Zark
Last edited by Zarken_Ventreth on Fri Jun 19, 2009 11:10 am; edited 1 time in total |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
IABoomer Moderator
Joined: 29 Oct 2006 Posts: 7351
|
Posted: Fri Jun 19, 2009 10:17 am Post subject: |
|
|
| When you get to a table with unknowns, you could look them up, decide based on their history if they're good or bad MTT players, and adjust your play accordingly. Thus, it could be used as a strategic tool and not just a ledger. Sharkscope faces some of the same issues. You get access to data on a player without playing them or observing them firsthand. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
bigpairde Chipluder
Joined: 26 Apr 2008 Posts: 8905
|
Posted: Fri Jun 19, 2009 10:22 am Post subject: |
|
|
ugh
it doesn't say anything bout my opponent though in term of how they play, as opposite to sides where you can buy HH and datamine.
opr only shows whether or not you are a winning or loosing player at tourneys, and what tourneys you played with the according results. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Zarken_Ventreth Full House
Joined: 09 May 2009 Posts: 160 Location: High in the Mountains
|
Posted: Fri Jun 19, 2009 10:23 am Post subject: |
|
|
IA,
Thank you for your reply to my post. I still do not understand how this provides a clear and distinct advantage for one player over another. With so many sites tracking the play of online players (by screen name) and Shark Scope, as you mentioned, being just one of these... is Full Tilt planning to terminate the access to player history from all of these sites as well? It would seem to be unfair to ban one without banning all. Thanks again for the rapid reply. Best of luck to you at the tables.
Zark |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Zarken_Ventreth Full House
Joined: 09 May 2009 Posts: 160 Location: High in the Mountains
|
Posted: Fri Jun 19, 2009 10:26 am Post subject: |
|
|
De,
Thanks for your reply to the post. Did you use OPR regularly? Just curious.
Zark |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
IABoomer Moderator
Joined: 29 Oct 2006 Posts: 7351
|
Posted: Fri Jun 19, 2009 10:33 am Post subject: |
|
|
Let's assume I've sat down at the table and I OPR/Sharkscope my opponents. Opponents who are winning players will most likely have a good understanding of the subtleties of tournament play, meaning I can make different plays against them because they'll be thinking on a level enough to understand what I'm doing. Opponents who are losing players will most likely have a poorer understanding of tournament play, and thus I can use that information to my advantage. Where a good winning tournament player might make a certain play, a losing player would do the opposite. This gives me a read on an opponent that, combined with my observation at the table, gives me an unfair advantage (provided they didn't look me up).
Not saying I agree with blocking access, just that I can kind of understand the logic. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Zarken_Ventreth Full House
Joined: 09 May 2009 Posts: 160 Location: High in the Mountains
|
Posted: Fri Jun 19, 2009 10:46 am Post subject: |
|
|
IA,
That is a fair assessment. If that is the case, however, what about all of the sites where people have paid a premium/fee to have access to this same information? Are you aware of Full Tilt's plan in regard to shutting down access to those sites as well? With the issues with pay for US players and other things going on with Full Tilt right now... don't you think this is a bit of poor timing? Just curious as to your thoughts on the matter. Thanks again for your rapid replies to my inquiry.
Zark |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
IABoomer Moderator
Joined: 29 Oct 2006 Posts: 7351
|
Posted: Fri Jun 19, 2009 10:52 am Post subject: |
|
|
http://www.fulltiltpoker.com/prohibited_programs.php
They do have a policy against shared databases. The problem is, catching the offenders. Pokertracker is an allowed program. How can they know where the data in my PT database came from?
Note: I'm only playing Devil's Advocate here. I don't have a PT database with hands I didn't play. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
BOYNAMEDSUE Moderator
Joined: 27 Jun 2005 Posts: 9111 Location: Mypos
|
Posted: Fri Jun 19, 2009 11:01 am Post subject: |
|
|
| Kudos to FTP for banning OPR. Sharkscope should be next. The only info on players I should be able to analyze is info I obtained myself, through hh files where I played with that person. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Zarken_Ventreth Full House
Joined: 09 May 2009 Posts: 160 Location: High in the Mountains
|
Posted: Fri Jun 19, 2009 11:02 am Post subject: |
|
|
IA and Boy,
Agreed... I have not paid for any of the premium services that are said to provide such info. My only player tracking is done through notes and color codes for those whom I have played against. Simple and as straight forward as one can get.
One of the features I did enjoy, however, from OPR was to see how some of my friends had been running over the past week. It is difficult to catch up with many of them as they are spread over so many different time zones. OPR was simply a easy way to check on my own improvement/or lack of same and to see how other FTP poker acquaintances were running over the past week or so.
I suppose this one will just be the beginning of many closures of access to Full Tilt player data. Is this a safe assumption?
Zark |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Kam1972 Message Board Junkie
Joined: 03 Sep 2008 Posts: 2181 Location: Lady Luck's house asking nicely for favouritism.
|
Posted: Fri Jun 19, 2009 11:12 am Post subject: |
|
|
I find the ban on OPR pretty stupid to be honest. The idea that a winning player is good, and a losing one will play bad makes anyone using that as a guideline more a donkey than anything else to be truthful. Sure if they have a massive long history of winning maybe, but I've seen plenty of players on OPR with +ROI's that play horrible poker. I really can't see anyone seriously making an accessment on how a person is going to play based solely on looking them up on OPR.
To decide it's enough of an edge to think it needs banning is in my view a bit of a joke, as really it's not going to shape how you play a person that much in truth. What you see as you play the table does that. Can people honestly say they form a game plan based on someones OPR rating? |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
feihua Omnikarmic Wheee Sensei
Joined: 14 Oct 2006 Posts: 3333 Location: Fukuoka >>> Austin
|
Posted: Fri Jun 19, 2009 11:26 am Post subject: |
|
|
I think it was a good move.
Before I would be against such a move.
But then I blocked my own stats from viewing, including mine.
And I was a better player for it.
It wasn't necessarily good to see what history pointed out the fish to be......it was better that I kept my mind on my game rather than the other person's game.
Because I hid my stats, it is a non-issue to me. But also because I hid my stats, I can see where it is obviously a tool for those who wish to use it as one.
Bottom line: you don't need it. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
feihua Omnikarmic Wheee Sensei
Joined: 14 Oct 2006 Posts: 3333 Location: Fukuoka >>> Austin
|
Posted: Fri Jun 19, 2009 11:28 am Post subject: |
|
|
Ohhhhhhh......because the other thread is locked and you think it is good because you can track your own play?
Here:
http://www.pokerprolabs.com/topshark/
It doesn't include private tournaments but it works kind of like a combination of Sharkscope and OPR. Full Tilt hasn't reached it, yet, I don't believe. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Sand Wedge_100 Message Board Junkie
Joined: 27 Sep 2007 Posts: 1545
|
Posted: Fri Jun 19, 2009 11:35 am Post subject: |
|
|
The gotta ban sharkscope and their OWN LEADERBOARDS too IMO
I'm really pissed about this.
I really dont depend on it but I get a kick out of those guys that are playing every-other pot with a -30% ROI. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
drewg22 Full House
Joined: 25 May 2008 Posts: 234
|
Posted: Fri Jun 19, 2009 11:39 am Post subject: |
|
|
| Terrible decision. As long as the service is free and open to everyone, I don't see how it gives an unfair advantage. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|