| Author |
Message |
NilesMonkey Message Board Junkie
Joined: 13 Dec 2007 Posts: 1524 Location: Schenectady, NY
|
Posted: Fri Jul 31, 2009 12:21 am Post subject: 99 - Overcard on Flop, Facing a Raise |
|
|
No major reads on opponent.
Blinds 25/50
Seat 1: 2104
Seat 2 (dealer): 1712
Hero (Seat 3, SB): 1760
Seat 5 (BB): 2186
Seat 7: 3732
Seat 10: 2313
Hero is dealt 9h9c
Seat 7 folds
Seat 10 calls 50
Seat 1 folds
Seat 2 folds
Hero raises to 175
Seat 5 folds
Seat 10 calls 125
Flop: Ks, 6d, 8h (2 players, pot = 400)
Hero bets 250
Seat 10 raises to 535
Hero - ??? |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
CitizenCain Three Pair
Joined: 23 Oct 2006 Posts: 2474 Location: Behind a huge stack of chips.
|
Posted: Fri Jul 31, 2009 12:38 am Post subject: |
|
|
Fold.
Unless there's some reason not to based on information you haven't given us.... but I'd certainly default to thinking we'll find better spots to try to double up than facing an over card and a raise, and see no point in calling off like a fifth of our stack to see the turn. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
HuJwang Forum Blight
Joined: 20 Aug 2006 Posts: 9190 Location: Halifax, NS
|
Posted: Fri Jul 31, 2009 2:48 am Post subject: |
|
|
| what is the stake? |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Penoyer79 Two Pair
Joined: 27 Jul 2009 Posts: 65
|
Posted: Fri Jul 31, 2009 4:16 am Post subject: |
|
|
easy fold for me.
your chip stack is still good, you dont have a whole lot invested in this pot.
all you have is basically middle pair... and if he hit the king, two pair, or a set... you're basically drawing slim to dead
with your stack size.... you still have more then enough room to manuver. i see no need to get out of line here.
i'd let this one go and wait for a better sport. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
fat rugger Message Board Junkie
Joined: 06 Feb 2009 Posts: 1033
|
Posted: Fri Jul 31, 2009 9:10 am Post subject: |
|
|
| I think you should let it go. no reason to risk it this early in the tourny. This still leaves you with pleanty of chips to steal with. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|
Powered by phpBB Copyright 2001, 2005 phpBB Group
|