| Author |
Message |
tracysanders I EAT MTTs
Joined: 02 Apr 2008 Posts: 8577 Location: ANOTHER FUQQUIN MINCASH
|
Posted: Tue Nov 17, 2009 11:07 pm Post subject: $75 buyin line check |
|
|
Villian had been opening quite a few pots, but hasn't really shown down anything to make me think he was too bad- he has a sharky by his name and 13k profits fwiw.
Full Tilt Poker $40,000 Guarantee No Limit Hold'em Tournament - t200/t400 Blinds + t50 - 9 players -
The Official Hand History
UTG: t7754 M = 7.38
UTG+1: t7083 M = 6.75
UTG+2: t19898 M = 18.95
MP1: t15414 M = 14.68
MP2: t20245 M = 19.28
CO: t4920 M = 4.69
BTN: t21003 M = 20.00
SB: t10595 M = 10.09
Hero (BB): t14873 M = 14.16
Pre Flop: (t1050) Hero is BB with K A
2 folds, UTG+2 raises to t1000, 5 folds, Hero raises to t2889, UTG+2 calls t1889
Flop: (t6428) 5 T 6 (2 players)
Hero bets t2800, UTG+2 calls t2800
Turn: (t12028) 7 (2 players)
Hero checks, UTG+2 checks
River: (t12028) A (2 players)
Hero bets t9134 all in, UTG+2 calls t9134 |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
tjb111 forum BAP bumper
Joined: 26 Jun 2008 Posts: 3783
|
Posted: Wed Nov 18, 2009 12:02 am Post subject: |
|
|
| im pretty sure there isnt anything NOT standard here |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
HuJwang Forum Blight
Joined: 20 Aug 2006 Posts: 9192 Location: Halifax, NS
|
Posted: Wed Nov 18, 2009 1:03 am Post subject: |
|
|
| i think if you cbet here it should be a little bigger. i definitely jam turn as played. with your small flop bet, i think his calling range is going to be wide enough to include a lot of hands that he's not planning on stacking off with |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
tracysanders I EAT MTTs
Joined: 02 Apr 2008 Posts: 8577 Location: ANOTHER FUQQUIN MINCASH
|
Posted: Wed Nov 18, 2009 1:34 am Post subject: |
|
|
| yeah I meant to bet 3800 and hit 2800 by mistake on the flop |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
doyle11 Full House
Joined: 29 Jul 2005 Posts: 198
|
Posted: Wed Nov 18, 2009 1:39 am Post subject: |
|
|
i probably shove preflop....ur 3 bet is too small but a bigger bets commits u to the pot neways so i think a shove is good here.
flop:And if u r in this situation on the flop i dnt mind the small continuation bet but i feel its a bit weak and might be taken advantage of. I think i might just check it here considerin how much of ur stack is left i wouldnt want to risk a good portion on a continuation bet that might not work.Next best move might be to push and hope(may be the best choice). Then of course third is the small continution bet.
Turn checkings fine of course u dnt have anythin but a good turn givin u a nut draw.
River: considerin wat hands hed call u wit(u get weaker hands to fold, only flushes or sets r gona call) id probably be happy check callin(reevaluate after the bet whether to call or fold) or go check check. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
HuJwang Forum Blight
Joined: 20 Aug 2006 Posts: 9192 Location: Halifax, NS
|
Posted: Wed Nov 18, 2009 2:50 am Post subject: |
|
|
| i don't think a preflop shove is too horrible. you are just at that stack size where all of your options are pretty annoying. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
MattVegasPwn Message Board Junkie
Joined: 15 Aug 2009 Posts: 1039
|
Posted: Wed Nov 18, 2009 5:10 am Post subject: |
|
|
-I don't like a preflop shove at all. Your going to chase out the bottom of his range that you'll get value from, and get called by anything that you dont want to get called by. I like your 3 bet size.
-Don't misclick flop c-bet =]
-Tbh I'm shovamenting that turn. But as played I'm c/c the river, I don't see him calling with worse ever, or folding better. Atleast if we check we add a small bluff range.
-If he did call your river shove with like QQ or K10 or something silly, this deffo belongs in the thinest value bet thread  |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
bigpairde Moderator
Joined: 26 Apr 2008 Posts: 10087 Location: Sweden
|
Posted: Wed Nov 18, 2009 5:45 am Post subject: |
|
|
pre: stacks are still a bit deep for 3bet shoving imo. don't think it would be that horrible, but i think the sizing of your 3bet is fine.
flop: i wouldn't like a check here at all (OOP in 3bet pot). obv don't misclick
turn: i would be finding myself jamming and wondering if i was being a spewtard again. think your check is fine. did you check in order to check/fold unimproved on river?
river: i think i would like a c/c since we are so likely to be ahead of his betting range there but i am not that confident we are ahead of his calling range when we shove |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
tracysanders I EAT MTTs
Joined: 02 Apr 2008 Posts: 8577 Location: ANOTHER FUQQUIN MINCASH
|
Posted: Wed Nov 18, 2009 3:13 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| bigpairde wrote: |
pre: stacks are still a bit deep for 3bet shoving imo. don't think it would be that horrible, but i think the sizing of your 3bet is fine.
I agree with this, although shoving would have definately made postflop play much much easier- this would have been my default 2 months ago or so
flop: i wouldn't like a check here at all (OOP in 3bet pot). obv don't misclick
turn: i would be finding myself jamming and wondering if i was being a spewtard again. think your check is fine. did you check in order to check/fold unimproved on river?
here's where it gets tricky, I figured the guy just floated my weak flop bet- I have seen that alot. So pretty much I had him ranged on PPs (which obv could've set up, but no way to tell for certain), and high cards.
The turn gave me 15 outs vs the majority of his range. I didn't like a shove here, but would have definately spew-called a spazshove and prayed for the best--- my plan was take the free card and c/f river if I missed. I know this also seems spewy with my remaining stack, but I was certain I could find a good double up spot if needed- seems I play better with a short stack and less decisions to make when the blinds get high anyways. I would be perfectly comfortable sitting on a reshove stack and only having pay the SB before having good position
river: i think i would like a c/c since we are so likely to be ahead of his betting range there but i am not that confident we are ahead of his calling range when we shove I agree with this now- seems to make sense. |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
francois8 Message Board Junkie
Joined: 10 Jun 2008 Posts: 3895 Location: getting bent over the bubble
|
Posted: Wed Nov 18, 2009 4:01 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I hadn't posted my thoughts since I watched this hand unfold and therefore know the result and can't get it out of my head... so I'm going to fire some more questions. I think I would have played the hand pf and OTF very similar to this, and no way I get away from river... I may have shoved turn, not sure.
| bigpairde wrote: |
river: i think i would like a c/c since we are so likely to be ahead of his betting range there but i am not that confident we are ahead of his calling range when we shove |
This ^^ is the most interesting thing that I've read written here so far, I agree.
Since I watched the hand unfold, I've been trying to think if a 3-bet pf shove is really that bad. At first glance, I also thought that it was unnecessary for the reasons that Matt pointed out (behind if he calls, he'll fold when we're ahead). He may also fold hands such as 88-TT to a shove here if he's nitty, and we add 10% to our stack while avoiding playing a big hand post flop OOP. And for a non-shove 3-bet, I obviously think that the size of TS' 3-bet here is appropriate. But once we 3-bet here, we're left out of position with 17k and 6k in the pot.
What about on the flop? Is it complete spew to shove that flop? If I'm villain with JJ and TS shoves, I think I throw up in my mouth tbh. If we make a regular CB and call (2800 or 3800 either way) we've now created a situation where we're still OOP and the pot is now the size of our stack. Coupled with that we don't know where we are, this can't be good.
Short of catching an A or K, that turn card is about as good as it gets and I'm pretty sure I shove the turn here, the more I think about it. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
tracysanders I EAT MTTs
Joined: 02 Apr 2008 Posts: 8577 Location: ANOTHER FUQQUIN MINCASH
|
Posted: Wed Nov 18, 2009 4:16 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Fran- I think shoving flop screams AK and gets snapped every time sir |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
francois8 Message Board Junkie
Joined: 10 Jun 2008 Posts: 3895 Location: getting bent over the bubble
|
Posted: Wed Nov 18, 2009 4:24 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| tracysanders wrote: |
| Fran- I think shoving flop screams AK and gets snapped every time sir |
You're probably right, but I was trying to think what I would do in your spot OTF if I really had JJ and QQ, no hearts. I think I'd shove that flop. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
bleffo19 Message Board Junkie
Joined: 30 Apr 2009 Posts: 1512 Location: SYD, Australia
|
Posted: Wed Nov 18, 2009 5:03 pm Post subject: |
|
|
obv the flop cbet is a misclick, so there's no need to comment on that. the one thing that caught my attention is stacks and sizing.
even after misclicking flop cbet you have slightly less than a pot-sized shove OTR. if you had cbet 3.8k you would have less than a 1/2 pot shove left. this bugs me, coz villain will snap us off with almost all of his flop continuing range, getting awesome odds. stacks seem very awkward here. i don't know how to work around this, but nobody's explicitly brought this up yet. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
marsupial311 Royal Flush
Joined: 14 Oct 2008 Posts: 738
|
Posted: Wed Nov 18, 2009 5:25 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Villian's line makes it weird to put him on suited connectors that hit on the turn. The shove is standard but what are we really ahead of? AJ-AQ probably wouldn't stick around after the flop then call a shove (or would it?) and JJ+ wouldn't want to play that passively with all the draws out there and a 3bet from the BB can easily include those kinds of hands.
Weird spot but I would take the same line. Of course, my thinking is far below the $75 buyin so it might be all wrong . |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Riddim Moderator
Joined: 04 Dec 2005 Posts: 10517 Location: Sweden
|
Posted: Wed Nov 18, 2009 5:29 pm Post subject: |
|
|
If I know he's decent I probably just c/f flop unless I've been pretty active myself, because villain really shouldn't have too many (if any) hands in his range that he's folding to a flop c-bet otherwise. If you do bet I like your sizing, because I don't think I'm a fan of betting flop without shoving a fair amount of turns, so something bigger would put you in a weird spot where he's getting pretty good odds to call a shove when you want to jam the turn.
Even if villain is folding lots of flops so the c-bet is good on its own, I am definitely jamming this turn btw.
On the river I doubt that you're getting more money out of him very often no matter what you do, because your hand looks so much like either AK or something too weak to call a value bet. With that said, I prefer shoving because at least then he might call you with his bluff catchers (pretty much his entire range I'm guessing) instead of checking them back hoping to be good. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|