| Author |
Message |
nilgiri Message Board Junkie
Joined: 11 Jan 2007 Posts: 3790 Location: Massachusetts
|
Posted: Tue Nov 03, 2009 12:08 pm Post subject: ad·just·ment (ə-ˈjəs(t)-mənt): the act or process of adjusting |
|
|
dumbo2000: raises $2 to $4
nilgiri: raises $285.35 to $289.35 and is all-in
KeiChi: folds
Degenerate20: folds
dumbo2000: folds
Uncalled bet ($285.35) returned to nilgiri
nilgiri collected $11 from pot
dumbo2000: raises $2 to $4
nilgiri: raises $330.35 to $334.35 and is all-in
KeiChi: folds
dumbo2000: folds
Uncalled bet ($330.35) returned to nilgiri
nilgiri collected $10 from pot
dumbo2000: raises $2 to $4
nilgiri: raises $342.10 to $346.10 and is all-in
KeiChi: folds
dumbo2000: folds
Uncalled bet ($342.10) returned to nilgiri
nilgiri collected $10 from pot
dumbo2000: raises $2 to $4
nilgiri: raises $250.90 to $254.90 and is all-in
2Tommy3: folds
dumbo2000: folds
Uncalled bet ($250.90) returned to nilgiri
nilgiri collected $10 from pot
dumbo2000: raises $2 to $4
NoLimit4Me1: folds
nilgiri: raises $248.15 to $252.15 and is all-in
2Tommy3: folds
dumbo2000: folds
Uncalled bet ($248.15) returned to nilgiri
nilgiri collected $10 from pot
dumbo2000: raises $2 to $4
NoLimit4Me1: folds
nilgiri: raises $199 to $203 and is all-in
dumbo2000: folds
Uncalled bet ($199) returned to nilgiri
nilgiri collected $9 from pot
dumbo2000: raises $2 to $4
nilgiri: raises $338.10 to $342.10 and is all-in
dumbo2000: folds
Uncalled bet ($338.10) returned to nilgiri
nilgiri collected $8 from pot
dumbo2000: raises $2 to $4
nilgiri: raises $282.35 to $286.35 and is all-in
dumbo2000: folds
Uncalled bet ($282.35) returned to nilgiri
nilgiri collected $8 from pot |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
BBCOACH44 Full Tilt Coach
Joined: 24 Oct 2006 Posts: 7435 Location: IN THE BATTING CAGE W/ DA ROOKIES
|
Posted: Tue Nov 03, 2009 12:12 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Nice One Nil...........  |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
nilgiri Message Board Junkie
Joined: 11 Jan 2007 Posts: 3790 Location: Massachusetts
|
Posted: Tue Nov 03, 2009 12:18 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Sometimes shortstackers can be fun.  |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
deadmeat82 Royal Flush
Joined: 04 Mar 2008 Posts: 772 Location: rakeback 4 everybody else plz!!!
|
Posted: Tue Nov 03, 2009 12:28 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| ..so thats the secret to 200nl... |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
bigpairde Chipluder
Joined: 26 Apr 2008 Posts: 8910
|
Posted: Tue Nov 03, 2009 12:35 pm Post subject: |
|
|
rofl
vn1 nil |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
TinkyTyler Royal Flush
Joined: 15 Jun 2008 Posts: 979 Location: Toronto
|
Posted: Tue Nov 03, 2009 12:57 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| So... did he ever stack off out of frustration? |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
nilgiri Message Board Junkie
Joined: 11 Jan 2007 Posts: 3790 Location: Massachusetts
|
Posted: Tue Nov 03, 2009 3:37 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| TinkyTyler wrote: |
| So... did he ever stack off out of frustration? |
Lol nope.
I did eventually stack him here though:
Grabbed by
NL Holdem $2(BB) Replayer
SB ($43)
BB ($44)
UTG ($42.45)
CO ($37.10)
Hero ($352)
Dealt to Hero T K
fold, CO raises to $4, Hero calls $4, fold, fold
FLOP ($11) 4 T 2
CO bets $6, Hero raises to $12, CO raises to $33.10 (AI), Hero calls $21.10
TURN ($77.20) 4 T 2 3
RIVER ($77.20) 4 T 2 3 5
CO shows T 7
(Pre 27%, Flop 13.9%, Turn 6.8%)
Hero shows T K
(Pre 73%, Flop 86.1%, Turn 93.2%)
Hero wins $75.20 |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
craigo6x Mr. Met
Joined: 30 Oct 2006 Posts: 4145 Location: Cursing the relievers in the bullpen
|
Posted: Tue Nov 03, 2009 5:51 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Just wondering nil-why are you playing $2 NL with 4 guys sitting at a 1/4 the max buy in?
Aren't you at a disadvantage to 4 shortstackers when you consider risk v reward (your dope excluded). |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
HuJwang Forum Blight
Joined: 20 Aug 2006 Posts: 8692 Location: Vancouver, BC
|
Posted: Wed Nov 04, 2009 2:22 am Post subject: |
|
|
| craigo6x wrote: |
Aren't you at a disadvantage to 4 shortstackers when you consider risk v reward (your dope excluded). |
no, why would you be? |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
fletch_smf Message Board Junkie
Joined: 06 Jun 2008 Posts: 3529 Location: Brisneyland
|
Posted: Wed Nov 04, 2009 4:10 am Post subject: |
|
|
| HuJwang wrote: |
| craigo6x wrote: |
Aren't you at a disadvantage to 4 shortstackers when you consider risk v reward (your dope excluded). |
no, why would you be? |
And why are you excluding his "dope"? |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
craigo6x Mr. Met
Joined: 30 Oct 2006 Posts: 4145 Location: Cursing the relievers in the bullpen
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
nilgiri Message Board Junkie
Joined: 11 Jan 2007 Posts: 3790 Location: Massachusetts
|
Posted: Wed Nov 04, 2009 3:22 pm Post subject: |
|
|
The guy in all these hands is a reg. Almost all 200nl shortstacker regs are pretty bad and pretty much just grinding massive numbers of tables for SNE. Very few of them are good enough to turn almost any profit otherwise. The other guys in the KT hand are all worse than he is...
In general, though, assuming no one is that great, I certainly don't mind playing at a table full of them... their shortstacking advantage comes from sitting at a table full of full stacks, because the full stacks can't (or don't) always adjust to the shortstacks. But when it is a table full of them, everyone has the same effective stack size, and their advantage is gone. It's a bit like sitting at a cap game, actually, and I always did quite well at those when I played on FTP.
I don't necessarily seek out tables like this, but I do think they are profitable if I run across them in the lobby. I'd much rather sit at a table like this than a table full of regs. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|