| Author |
Message |
G8Nutz
High Card
Joined: 10 Apr 2008
Posts: 2
|
 Posted: Fri Oct 30, 2009 11:44 pm Post subject: outlast the Donks in deep tourneys, is it possible? |
 |
|
| How in the world is it possible to defeat maniac idiots table after table in deep freeroll tourneys (aka 7500 max every 9pm EST). I would guess that 95% or more are barely decent players. Those 7000+ donkeys play 95% of their hands preflop in any position. Is it b/c it's a FREEroll?? Or do I just need to REALLY loosen it up early and even middle of the tourney till it gets down to that 5% cream-of-the-crop? |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Captain Japple
Message Board Junkie
Joined: 15 Feb 2008
Posts: 2043
Location: Nice bread though.
|
| Posted: Fri Oct 30, 2009 11:52 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| It's a freeroll. And the maniac idiots don't care because it's a freeroll, and they can get in the next one. Stay tight for the first few levels, then play your regular poker. If that doesn't work, get in the next freeroll. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
lovebeefstew
Also likes tacos
Joined: 19 Apr 2007
Posts: 5937
Location: Finished university one time :-)
|
| Posted: Sat Oct 31, 2009 2:15 am Post subject: |
|
|
| Shove good hands. Ez game. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
lurgertor
Four of a Kind
Joined: 04 Jun 2008
Posts: 345
Location: Riskville
|
| Posted: Sat Oct 31, 2009 7:42 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Shove when dealt aces, repeat process, easy game. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
francois8
Message Board Junkie
Joined: 10 Jun 2008
Posts: 1932
Location: Conshohocken, PA
|
| Posted: Sun Nov 01, 2009 1:23 am Post subject: |
|
|
| Dude its hard to beat a field of 7500 in anything... with a regular tourney of that size top 750-800 or so would get money. I'm sure its less in freeroll. If everyone's loose, you play tight, never bluff. When you get big hands, shove them since loose players will call. EZ game, but you'll need to run good also. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
qsins
High Card
Joined: 27 Nov 2008
Posts: 7
|
| Posted: Sun Nov 01, 2009 8:17 am Post subject: |
|
|
From my experience you dont have to play the first 5 hands unless you got something good
its easy to tell when somone is on tilt on a new board too when you get a table change. also these idiotic players normally are gone within 15 minutes just look at how many disapeer. the next thing that comes are big bluffers you gotta be able to recognize who the bullies are and be one yourself. after that its normally solid play. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
junkbutton
Forum Cooler
Joined: 17 Feb 2006
Posts: 4907
Location: Gutterrock, NY
|
| Posted: Sun Nov 01, 2009 8:18 am Post subject: |
|
|
| A freeroll that big is just BINGO... I disagree with playing tight for the first few levels like suggested earlier. You've got to find a hand that has potential, shove it and hope to get lucky. Do that a few times, get a stack going, and then you'll have a chance to make it deep. Playing tight, unless you get some big hands early, is only going to leave you with a major chip deficit compared to the others when you decide it's time to play real poker. Cashing in a field that big is going to take a lot of luck. Might as well take your chances early than sit around for 3 hours nursing a baby stack and have no real chance or getting deep. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
lovebeefstew
Also likes tacos
Joined: 19 Apr 2007
Posts: 5937
Location: Finished university one time :-)
|
| Posted: Sun Nov 01, 2009 8:27 am Post subject: |
|
|
| junkbutton wrote: |
| A freeroll that big is just BINGO... I disagree with playing tight for the first few levels like suggested earlier. You've got to find a hand that has potential, shove it and hope to get lucky. Do that a few times, get a stack going, and then you'll have a chance to make it deep. Playing tight, unless you get some big hands early, is only going to leave you with a major chip deficit compared to the others when you decide it's time to play real poker. Cashing in a field that big is going to take a lot of luck. Might as well take your chances early than sit around for 3 hours nursing a baby stack and have no real chance or getting deep. |
This is horrible advice on so many levels. Unless of course, it is just a level. In which case, it's just as dumb. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
junkbutton
Forum Cooler
Joined: 17 Feb 2006
Posts: 4907
Location: Gutterrock, NY
|
| Posted: Sun Nov 01, 2009 8:37 am Post subject: |
|
|
| lovebeefstew wrote: |
| junkbutton wrote: |
| A freeroll that big is just BINGO... I disagree with playing tight for the first few levels like suggested earlier. You've got to find a hand that has potential, shove it and hope to get lucky. Do that a few times, get a stack going, and then you'll have a chance to make it deep. Playing tight, unless you get some big hands early, is only going to leave you with a major chip deficit compared to the others when you decide it's time to play real poker. Cashing in a field that big is going to take a lot of luck. Might as well take your chances early than sit around for 3 hours nursing a baby stack and have no real chance or getting deep. |
This is horrible advice on so many levels. Unless of course, it is just a level. In which case, it's just as dumb. |
Please be specific... This is pretty much what you said, but with a few more words, plus I'll assume I'm playing looser here. When you're sitting with T1,200 and everyone else has T9,000 and you finally get JJ to shove, and 3 people call you, you're toast. I'm just saying that there's no point in wasting 3 hours to get to that point. Get lucky early or get out. It's a freeroll we're talking about here. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
lovebeefstew
Also likes tacos
Joined: 19 Apr 2007
Posts: 5937
Location: Finished university one time :-)
|
| Posted: Sun Nov 01, 2009 8:55 am Post subject: |
|
|
| junkbutton wrote: |
| lovebeefstew wrote: |
| junkbutton wrote: |
| A freeroll that big is just BINGO... I disagree with playing tight for the first few levels like suggested earlier. You've got to find a hand that has potential, shove it and hope to get lucky. Do that a few times, get a stack going, and then you'll have a chance to make it deep. Playing tight, unless you get some big hands early, is only going to leave you with a major chip deficit compared to the others when you decide it's time to play real poker. Cashing in a field that big is going to take a lot of luck. Might as well take your chances early than sit around for 3 hours nursing a baby stack and have no real chance or getting deep. |
This is horrible advice on so many levels. Unless of course, it is just a level. In which case, it's just as dumb. |
Please be specific... This is pretty much what you said, but with a few more words, plus I'll assume I'm playing looser here. When you're sitting with T1,200 and everyone else has T9,000 and you finally get JJ to shove, and 3 people call you, you're toast. I'm just saying that there's no point in wasting 3 hours to get to that point. Get lucky early or get out. It's a freeroll we're talking about here. |
The OP mentions nothing of the way we value the tournament in terms of monetary means. Only that others may value it as you mention (ie a FREEroll). The way in which to succeed in freerolls is not to just gamble and chip up early at all. Sure, this might be a strategy you or I might use, since we don't give a rats azz if we lose. But this does not mean it is the most +ev strategy at all.
It's a common misconception. Like people think in turbo games you have to be looser, which is just wrong. If anything, you need to tighen up since alot of the time, all your chips are all going in when you play a hand. This is similar to freerolls. The best strategy is to tighten up, and when you get a hand, be prepared to stick your whole stack in. By definition, this means that we should be more selective with our hands.
I feel you are confusing the way in which most people would play these games (based on the nature of affordability), with what is actually the optimum way to play them, which is the issue clearly lacking in OP's arsenal. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
junkbutton
Forum Cooler
Joined: 17 Feb 2006
Posts: 4907
Location: Gutterrock, NY
|
| Posted: Sun Nov 01, 2009 9:51 am Post subject: |
|
|
| lovebeefstew wrote: |
I feel you are confusing the way in which most people would play these games (based on the nature of affordability), with what is actually the optimum way to play them, which is the issue clearly lacking in OP's arsenal. |
I'm just sharing the way I would play it, taking into consideration both how most people would play it and the way I feel is the optimum way to play it. It's the way I play the weekly 2+2 pokercast freeroll on Stars. It's not a 7,000 person field, but it's 2-3K and I've had some success with them, so I thought I'd share. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
lovebeefstew
Also likes tacos
Joined: 19 Apr 2007
Posts: 5937
Location: Finished university one time :-)
|
| Posted: Sun Nov 01, 2009 10:14 am Post subject: |
|
|
| junkbutton wrote: |
| lovebeefstew wrote: |
I feel you are confusing the way in which most people would play these games (based on the nature of affordability), with what is actually the optimum way to play them, which is the issue clearly lacking in OP's arsenal. |
I'm just sharing the way I would play it, taking into consideration both how most people would play it and the way I feel is the optimum way to play it. It's the way I play the weekly 2+2 pokercast freeroll on Stars. It's not a 7,000 person field, but it's 2-3K and I've had some success with them, so I thought I'd share. |
Well I would argue that while I totally understand why you would play freerolls like this, given that they are indeed free, it is a far from optimal strategy based on a decent volume. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
dcdoorknob
Twist and Shout
Joined: 11 May 2007
Posts: 2419
Location: Mississippi
|
| Posted: Sun Nov 01, 2009 11:10 am Post subject: |
|
|
| Heh well I think optimum is somewhere in the middle here. I play freerolls like TAG on steroids, but not really super tight. I just need a hand that rates to be at least slightly ahead and I'm willing to go with it. That can be AA obv, or it can be A8 preflop or 2nd pair post flop, depending on the villain. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
DannehBoi
Four of a Kind
Joined: 26 Jan 2009
Posts: 319
|
| Posted: Mon Nov 02, 2009 10:12 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| dcdoorknob wrote: |
| Heh well I think optimum is somewhere in the middle here. I play freerolls like TAG on steroids, but not really super tight. |
This.
Play 100% ABC poker in freerolls. It's the most effective method because your opponents will not be looking at what you're doing, only at their cards.
Raise with Ace face in the proper position. Limp with pocket pairs. Limp with suited connectors if you got a couple limpers behind you.
Bet out all your made hands unless you're facing a complete maniac.
Check/call flush/straight draws.
All that good stuff. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
FAQ
Search
Register
Profile
Log in to check your private messages
Log in
