| Author |
Message |
ShakeMyAZ
Pair
Joined: 05 Aug 2008
Posts: 40
|
 Posted: Tue Oct 27, 2009 2:57 pm Post subject: 25nl heads up tables and lower |
 |
|
Hey,
Why not implementing those ? More rake, more profit for FT.
Also, it would be nice to be able to play head's up without needing $2500 bankroll or having to put $50 on the table just to take a shot.
Any toughts ? |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
ShakeMyAZ
Pair
Joined: 05 Aug 2008
Posts: 40
|
| Posted: Thu Oct 29, 2009 2:20 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| I'm very surprised there is no interest for this. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
uconnrounder
Two Pair
Joined: 13 Jul 2008
Posts: 71
|
| Posted: Thu Oct 29, 2009 3:34 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I would like this. I plan to move some money over to Cake specifically to get some experience in HU cash at a level that I feel comfortable. If FT implemented these tables at .05/.10 and .10/.25 I would have no reason to move money away from FT.
However, the rake structure needs to be appropriate. FT needs to take this into consideration as I've heard people complaining about the rake at 50nl. It will be worse (percentage-wise) at 10nl or 25nl.
That being said, I would really like to see these tables added. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
aarosakura
Message Board Junkie
Joined: 26 Mar 2009
Posts: 1458
Location: In my bed all warm D:
|
| Posted: Thu Oct 29, 2009 8:51 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| +1 |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
CompleteDonk
LOLDONKAMENTS
Joined: 18 Mar 2007
Posts: 4014
Location: Coaching? PM Me
|
| Posted: Thu Oct 29, 2009 9:15 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| This would kill the midstakes HU games even more then they already are. Terrible decision if FTP implements this. I believe TilterDoug said the same thing and that it'd be very unlikely for this to happen. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
ShakeMyAZ
Pair
Joined: 05 Aug 2008
Posts: 40
|
| Posted: Sat Oct 31, 2009 7:47 am Post subject: |
|
|
| CompleteDonk wrote: |
| This would kill the midstakes HU games even more then they already are. Terrible decision if FTP implements this. I believe TilterDoug said the same thing and that it'd be very unlikely for this to happen. |
I don't see why implementing 10nl and 25nl hu tables would kill higher action, of course people would be able to play at a lower level but it will bring more people to heads up at the lower levels and thus, the higher by the time imo |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
CompleteDonk
LOLDONKAMENTS
Joined: 18 Mar 2007
Posts: 4014
Location: Coaching? PM Me
|
| Posted: Sat Oct 31, 2009 8:13 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| ShakeMyAZ wrote: |
| CompleteDonk wrote: |
| This would kill the midstakes HU games even more then they already are. Terrible decision if FTP implements this. I believe TilterDoug said the same thing and that it'd be very unlikely for this to happen. |
I don't see why implementing 10nl and 25nl hu tables would kill higher action, of course people would be able to play at a lower level but it will bring more people to heads up at the lower levels and thus, the higher by the time imo |
When 50NL was made, it killed some of the action from people who played too high etc. This will do the same thing times 1000000. They now can play lower stakes and it spreads out the games even more than they are now. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
beachbabex911x
High Card
Joined: 16 Nov 2007
Posts: 12
|
| Posted: Sat Oct 31, 2009 8:46 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| i think its crazy to have 1.10 heads up sngs but if u want to play heads up cash games its a minimum of 10 but ull get slaughtered playing min buyins heads up so u need to put up 50 bucks ... lower stakes heads up would be great |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
junkbutton
Forum Cooler
Joined: 17 Feb 2006
Posts: 4935
Location: Gutterrock, NY
|
| Posted: Sat Oct 31, 2009 9:14 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| you would never beat the rake. full tilt is doing you a favor by not offering it... |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Flying_Kiwi
Bird of Mystery
Joined: 03 Sep 2006
Posts: 8457
Location: Spewing bonus $
|
| Posted: Sat Oct 31, 2009 9:19 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| If you want to play micro HU, you're much better off playing micro HUSNGs. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
ShakeMyAZ
Pair
Joined: 05 Aug 2008
Posts: 40
|
| Posted: Mon Nov 02, 2009 7:56 am Post subject: |
|
|
| Flying_Kiwi wrote: |
| If you want to play micro HU, you're much better off playing micro HUSNGs. |
No offense, but HU SNG is a joke, I don't want to play 50bb deep or less poker honestly.
Also, the rake structure would need to be adjusted I guess. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Flying_Kiwi
Bird of Mystery
Joined: 03 Sep 2006
Posts: 8457
Location: Spewing bonus $
|
| Posted: Mon Nov 02, 2009 3:38 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Then don't. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
DforDissent
Message Board Junkie
Joined: 30 Mar 2009
Posts: 1241
Location: on the verge of figuring out my "best game to 100% focus on" finallyforrealthistimeImeanit
|
| Posted: Mon Nov 02, 2009 7:52 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Flying_Kiwi wrote: |
| If you want to play micro HU, you're much better off playing micro HUSNGs. |
No, just play fullring or shorthanded, but START the tables. Leave when 3handed.
No down side, and the up side is a lotta fullringers have no idea how to play headsup.
This applies to all forms of poker imo |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
FAQ
Search
Register
Profile
Log in to check your private messages
Log in
