| Author |
Message |
OutKasts Two Pair
Joined: 14 Jan 2009 Posts: 60
|
Posted: Fri Sep 18, 2009 2:27 am Post subject: Wussup with the min raises? |
|
|
I notice that a lot of players now days are using the check min raise or if someone C-bet flop they would min raise in position? anyone else notice that TREND to? What's behind this? |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
lurgertor Royal Flush
Joined: 04 Jun 2008 Posts: 772 Location: Riskville
|
Posted: Fri Sep 18, 2009 2:03 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Don't know, maybe their lazy and don't want to type in an amount and so just click raise or bet. Maybe they don't want to risk a lot of chips in case you really do have a hand. Maybe they are the ones with the big hand and are scared if they show true strength you'll muck. Or maybe they just forgot how to play poker. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Big Slick x13x Forum Icon
Joined: 18 Jun 2006 Posts: 6824 Location: The U.S.A.
|
Posted: Fri Sep 18, 2009 2:27 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Good players do it because the min raise can be interpreted in many different ways and they can use that to their advantage. Sometimes it's used in position to get the oop aggressor to check the turn and give them a free river. So pot control / free cards is an option. If the opp thinks it's really strong then they'll just fold out at a minimum risk to the raiser. If it looks really weak then the aggressor will 3bet into the raiser's monster and we take down a big pot. So it's really read dependent when it comes to good players doing it.
Other people do it because they feel like they should raise but they don't know how much and they don't want to risk the amount the pot button produces so they just min raise. Or they're a bad player who actually flopped a monster and doesn't want someone to be scared out. Usually the latter from what I've seen. So, in short, develop reads and punish people. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
mathman1115 Wizard of Odderation
Joined: 01 Sep 2005 Posts: 3753 Location: Land of the Fightin' Phillies
|
Posted: Sun Sep 20, 2009 9:54 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| The min raise used to drive me up a wall, especially PF. Now i find myself doing it, mainly PF but sometimes on the flop as well. It seems to work for the reasons that slick stated - it can be interpreted in many different ways. It can be a profitable play, especially if you do it for different reasons. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
TwoFireBall High Card
Joined: 02 Nov 2009 Posts: 10
|
Posted: Tue Nov 24, 2009 7:40 am Post subject: |
|
|
| I think min raises are a terrible idea! I see player min raise to what is the equivalent of a 20th of the pot! You're just asking to to get outdrawn by people hitting their miracle cards, even gutshot straight flush draws are going to call that! |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
conanav Royal Flush
Joined: 02 Sep 2007 Posts: 816 Location: Anywhere but here.
|
Posted: Wed Nov 25, 2009 4:15 am Post subject: |
|
|
| TwoFireBall wrote: |
| I think min raises are a terrible idea! I see player min raise to what is the equivalent of a 20th of the pot! You're just asking to to get outdrawn by people hitting their miracle cards, even gutshot straight flush draws are going to call that! |
For someone to raise to 1/20th of the pot the initial bet would have to be 1/40th of the pot. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
deadmeat82 Message Board Junkie
Joined: 04 Mar 2008 Posts: 1215 Location: rakeback 4 all
|
Posted: Wed Nov 25, 2009 4:29 am Post subject: |
|
|
I used to think that min raising was horrible as well, but after reading up on small ball poker I tend to use it quite a bit in micro cash games now.
I think the use of it is optimal in low stakes ring games. At the lower limits your opponents decisions seem to quite often be fold/call/raise, regardless of bet sizing. They're either going with the hand or they're gonna get rid of it. Therefore, the min raise induces that fold/call/raise at a minimal risk to you. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
hghlndr6 Message Board Junkie
Joined: 09 Nov 2006 Posts: 2867
|
Posted: Wed Nov 25, 2009 5:03 am Post subject: |
|
|
LOL There's a place for min raises in your game. Think: What do I want him to do? What does he think my min raise means? What will he do?
See where I'm going with that? Probably not. It goes so against the grain of the "approved" style of play these days. And that's why it's sometimes so profitable. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Big Slick x13x Forum Icon
Joined: 18 Jun 2006 Posts: 6824 Location: The U.S.A.
|
Posted: Wed Nov 25, 2009 9:05 am Post subject: |
|
|
| also if you watch high stakes poker you'll see that when they make raises they're not always 3-4x the bet amount. a lot of times they are only slightly more then a min raise. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
UFO1947 Take me2 ur Chip Leader
Joined: 08 Jun 2006 Posts: 5522 Location: NS, Canada
|
Posted: Wed Nov 25, 2009 12:29 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| lately everytime a bad player check min raises me it's the nuts or near nuts. for those type it seems they want to raise but not scare you away. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
DforDissent Message Board Junkie
Joined: 30 Mar 2009 Posts: 1258 Location: testing my theory that my "best game to 100% focus on" is HORSE mtts
|
Posted: Wed Nov 25, 2009 12:35 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| lurgertor wrote: |
| Don't know, maybe their lazy and don't want to type in an amount and so just click raise or bet. Maybe they don't want to risk a lot of chips in case you really do have a hand. Maybe they are the ones with the big hand and are scared if they show true strength you'll muck. Or maybe they just forgot how to play poker. |
I've seen it more often on a "dry" board, perhaps to say "don't bother chasing your overcards, you have no idea if I have a hand, and the pot is small -- fold now" or else to also trap "I've been min-raising every time I'm in a flop with you, come over the top right now and I'll just smooth-call you with my monster and then you won't know what to do on the turn, mwahahaha! i.e. save money by folding NOW". Or perhaps they MEANT to type a larger number, mistyped and missed the last digit, and the default min-raise was what their click registered as.
I've done all 3, tbh.
| Big Slick x13x wrote: |
| also if you watch high stakes poker you'll see that when they make raises they're not always 3-4x the bet amount. a lot of times they are only slightly more then a min raise. |
I loves the "2.5x raise" post-flop... heck, even pre-flop. It's large enough to often scare out risk-averse folks with medium hands, and it's small enough to not commit you if you're facing a cooler against a tight-honest player, AND it's small enough to appear that you are scared thus a loose-aggressive bully will often come over the top and you can fold-or-shove (and he won't notice that 80% of the time you have folded, this time shoving, i.e. he will likely pay you off with his non-monster!) I've been doing a lot of too-small-to-be-strong cont.bets when playing HU SnG, and it's amazing how often the opponent will fold (when you both have nothing) or else raise (which you can easily fold your air, or re-raise or smooth-call with your strong hand/draw). The game of poker keeps evolving... |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Goodnewsjonny High Card
Joined: 02 Oct 2009 Posts: 18
|
Posted: Sun Nov 29, 2009 1:44 am Post subject: |
|
|
| I find, certainly at a low buy in level anyway, that min re raises often relate to a very specific type of flop. That is paired flops. Say the flop comes down Q,Q,5, the first thing both players think about is does the other have a queen? An easy way for the OOP player to represent the queen is to throw out a small raise that looks like it wants action. The in position player recognises the action immediately as a classic bluff and min re raises to represent he queen himself. I have often been the OOP player in this situation myself and these days I usually re raise the re raise. My reason for doing so is this. At a low level, say a $5 tournament, you are not playing complex opponents, they all know how to checkraise and that's about it. most of them are bad players. If they had a queen OOP they would check call or perhaps check raise and in position they would simply smooth call. If they had a queen would they really min raise? surely they would be too afraid of chasing away their prey. however on a dangerous flop like K,10,A a check min raise from a fish is a big signal to throw away your pocket sevens, his powerhouse 10,2 off suit is going all the way if it needs to and theres nothing you can do about it. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
ChipStak Royal Flush
Joined: 12 Oct 2009 Posts: 930 Location: Schwarzenegger's playground
|
Posted: Sun Nov 29, 2009 2:09 am Post subject: |
|
|
| TwoFireBall wrote: |
| I think min raises are a terrible idea! I see player min raise to what is the equivalent of a 20th of the pot! You're just asking to to get outdrawn by people hitting their miracle cards, even gutshot straight flush draws are going to call that! |
thats why you do it with the nuts hoping the wild reraising dummy 3bets u all in, or you let someone catch their hand only to bust them too! |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
bleffo19 Message Board Junkie
Joined: 30 Apr 2009 Posts: 1524 Location: SYD, Australia
|
Posted: Sun Nov 29, 2009 2:56 am Post subject: |
|
|
unless proven otherwise, for me - min-raise=bad player. they have no idea how to extract value.
it can be used very effectively though by those who know how to control their opponents. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
tracybubbles High Card
Joined: 30 Nov 2009 Posts: 3
|
Posted: Mon Nov 30, 2009 4:24 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| under the gun w/ a good hand, (say,,qj suited) can be profitable, otherwise, in late pos. , its a waste of $$ |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|