| Author |
Message |
Philbird1 Message Board Junkie
Joined: 11 Aug 2009 Posts: 2368 Location: ><((((º>
|
Posted: Sun Sep 13, 2009 12:45 pm Post subject: Pre Flop Play |
|
|
For the pro play. Play 100 consecutive hands........8 or 9 handed.
If I am at a table, taking this challange and two or three people leave, or sit out, does it reset the counter?
Do I need to continue to play till more people show up? Or move to a different table?
TY |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
vectorspace Message Board Junkie
Joined: 17 Dec 2007 Posts: 1010 Location: Texas
|
Posted: Sun Sep 13, 2009 5:46 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Yes. Unfortunately, if you are dealt into a hand with less than 8 players, then the counter will reset. 100 hands is not that many though. I wouldn't really worry about it. If you are worried about the counter resetting, then uncheck "auto post blinds". That way you can manually post your blinds when enough people are at the table and choose to sit out when there aren't. As long as you aren't dealt into the hand, then the counter doesn't change. Oh, and you can switch tables all you want. The counter will just pick up where you left off. Don't post your BB out of turn though. That will reset the counter I believe.
Also, if you're multitabling at say 4 tables, then playing 25 hands at each of the tables will qualify assuming they're all 8 handed or more. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
NoTilt Royal Flush
Joined: 16 Apr 2009 Posts: 839
|
Posted: Mon Sep 14, 2009 2:38 am Post subject: |
|
|
Really? The counter resets? It's been ages since I finished this challenge, but I'm pretty sure the counter stays the same if you're dealt into a 7 handed hand. No advancing, and no zeroing. I could be wrong tho'. I always played 9-max tables and never kept track of players at the table.
I do know that the counter can be advanced quickly by multitabling. Also, if you choose to "pause" this challenge and move to another, it will "remember" how many hands you've done. This is all vague empirical evidence; your results may differ. Plus they're constantly closing loopholes and tinkering to improve tasks. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
wildqat Three of a Kind
Joined: 10 Jul 2009 Posts: 95 Location: KTUS
|
Posted: Mon Sep 14, 2009 3:38 am Post subject: |
|
|
| I concur with NoTilt. I recently did this challenge, and I had plenty of tables shrink down to 7- with no problems. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
vectorspace Message Board Junkie
Joined: 17 Dec 2007 Posts: 1010 Location: Texas
|
Posted: Tue Sep 15, 2009 12:00 am Post subject: |
|
|
| wildqat wrote: |
| I concur with NoTilt. I recently did this challenge, and I had plenty of tables shrink down to 7- with no problems. |
I stand corrected then. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Philbird1 Message Board Junkie
Joined: 11 Aug 2009 Posts: 2368 Location: ><((((º>
|
Posted: Thu Sep 17, 2009 4:30 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| TYVM |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Philbird1 Message Board Junkie
Joined: 11 Aug 2009 Posts: 2368 Location: ><((((º>
|
Posted: Sat Sep 19, 2009 8:14 am Post subject: |
|
|
Having a difficult time with this challange!
1. I don't think it's very realistic to expect everyone to fold to you for the first three tasks. Seven or eight people are not going to fold in front of you. And if they do it's at a higher stakes game. Why must everyone fold to you? Why not just raise with these hands?
Raise or fold 100 hands....... This task prooved costly! Open limping is NOT always a bad idea.
2. It gives you an idea of the strength of another player's hand. Let's say you want to look at a J 10 suited, cheap. It happens all the time in professional play!! I've seen Chris do it himself.
Did anyone who took this task on profit? I found myself folding some great hands cause they were questionable preflop.
Grrrrr |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
NoTilt Royal Flush
Joined: 16 Apr 2009 Posts: 839
|
Posted: Sat Sep 19, 2009 11:59 am Post subject: |
|
|
For #1, you're absolutely right. People just don't fold at lower stakes games, because they don't know any better. You see people open limping with 95o because they "have a feeling" they'll get two pair, or "just because it's cheap - nobody's raised yet, so it's only 2 cents." You want to punish those open limpers by raising - perhaps even raising with crap yourself. In his lesson, Gus even talks about REraising with crap to punish people who raise with crap. It's all about "leveling", which is a cool game theory idea.
The other problem I had with #1 was remembering to raise 2.5 times in the middle position. I'm so roboting with my 3x raises that I sometimes forgot.
For #2, JTs might be playable even for a raise. You probably don't lose a whole lot of EV by folding it, tho'. You don't want to limp with suited connectors and suited aces, and raise with PP or two broadway cards. That's telegraphing your hand strength to your opponents. Raising with all categories disguises that.
Also, remember that the task specificalyl refers to never OPEN limping. I think you can complete the task doing the following actions:
1) Calling a raise. You don't have to re-raise a raise, you can call it.
2) Calling ANOTHER limper. If 4 people have limped in already, I think you can limp too, and it won't reset the counter. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Philbird1 Message Board Junkie
Joined: 11 Aug 2009 Posts: 2368 Location: ><((((º>
|
Posted: Sat Sep 19, 2009 4:24 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Didn't know 1 and 2 you mentioned at the bottom of your post, TY. Hmmm, I'd like to spank a few bluffers with a bluff, but man, I have a hard enough time semi bluffing. I'll consider it. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
wildqat Three of a Kind
Joined: 10 Jul 2009 Posts: 95 Location: KTUS
|
Posted: Mon Sep 21, 2009 2:46 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Philbird1 wrote: |
| 1. I don't think it's very realistic to expect everyone to fold to you for the first three tasks. Seven or eight people are not going to fold in front of you. And if they do it's at a higher stakes game. |
Not true. I had no problem completing the mid-pos and late-pos tasks at 2¢NL. In fact, I had more trouble completing the early-pos task, although that was more because of the tight hand requirements. Even then, mid-pos is only a little looser, but it was far easier for me. Maybe it's because of your game selection... look for tables with about 30% seeing the flop.
| Philbird1 wrote: |
| Why must everyone fold to you? Why not just raise with these hands? |
Well, you probably should be raising with them anyway regardless of the action before you (for the most part). What Jesus is trying to get you in the habit of is not limping with them if you're first in. If you raise, and everybody folds, then oh well, everyone had crap and you won the blinds. If you raise and you get one or two callers, great, you're probably in good shape. If you limp and get four or five callers, you're still in good shape EV wise, but you're in much worse shape in win percentage. Watch Phil Gordon's 5 Common Hold 'em Leaks lesson for more on that.
| Philbird1 wrote: |
| Raise or fold 100 hands....... This task prooved costly! Open limping is NOT always a bad idea.... Let's say you want to look at a J 10 suited, cheap. It happens all the time in professional play!! I've seen Chris do it himself. |
I'm not going to argue this too hard, because there are times you can limp, see a cheap flop, and if you hit hard, then you can build a big pot. But the kinds of hands that the lesson talks about are not those types of hands; they're big hands that you want to build a big pot with. The types of hands you can reasonably limp with also tend to be trouble hands, especially when you hit the flop softly (say, JTs and you hit middle pair on the flop). Chris (and Phil's Leaks lesson) hand recommendations are designed to keep you out of as much trouble as possible until you develop the skills to play into and out of trouble postflop (with the exception of Chris's cutoff/button task, which is designed to teach you how to steal the blinds).
| Philbird1 wrote: |
| 2. It gives you an idea of the strength of another player's hand. |
I don't quite get what you're saying here... are you saying limping gives an idea, raising gives an idea, or are you questioning the concept altogether?
| Philbird1 wrote: |
| Did anyone who took this task on profit? I found myself folding some great hands cause they were questionable preflop. |
Eventually. I did have a big downswing at the beginning, part of which was due to dumbass plays, and part of which was due to getting sucked out on. Toward the end, though, I did have a small upswing back into positive territory. Not much, to be sure, and nobody's ever going to confuse me with a good player (I made dumbass plays then, and I still make dumbass plays now), but yeah, there is hope. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Philbird1 Message Board Junkie
Joined: 11 Aug 2009 Posts: 2368 Location: ><((((º>
|
Posted: Mon Sep 21, 2009 4:51 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Points well taken, TY |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Rincevent High Card
Joined: 25 Apr 2008 Posts: 9
|
Posted: Sat Oct 31, 2009 1:04 pm Post subject: |
|
|
there is something I don't understand with the challenge !?
I've activated it a while ago. I've played about 200 hands in cash game normal holdem no limit. I've done a turbo and normal holdem no limit MTT with more than 150 hands each (about 120 hands without the blinds). I've still not completed the pro task.
_ I've never OPEN limp except on the small blind (but they are ignored in the description).
Does that mean I need to see the flop to validate a hand or a folded one is taken in count ? I'm lost. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
KronX Pot Committed
Joined: 10 Jan 2007 Posts: 5072
|
Posted: Sat Oct 31, 2009 2:51 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Rincevent wrote: |
I've activated it a while ago. I've played about 200 hands in cash game normal holdem no limit. I've done a turbo and normal holdem no limit MTT with more than 150 hands each (about 120 hands without the blinds). I've still not completed the pro task.
|
It has to be 500 cash game hands. Hands played in sng's and MTT's do not count towards the pro challenge. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Rincevent High Card
Joined: 25 Apr 2008 Posts: 9
|
Posted: Sat Oct 31, 2009 8:19 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| KronX wrote: |
| It has to be 500 cash game hands. Hands played in sng's and MTT's do not count towards the pro challenge. |
Thank you, i will do that !
Edit : Thank you again. I should have made a mistake in the first cash cession. I got it with a few more hands. This is well cash game only. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
muktuk2 Flush
Joined: 09 Dec 2006 Posts: 136 Location: belgium
|
Posted: Mon Nov 23, 2009 8:57 pm Post subject: |
|
|
didn't have a problem to complete the challenge 10 times in about a week
I never play cash games, i like tourney's more. Don't even feel so much for holdem, omaha 8ob is my game so it cost me about 5 bucks...
But i managed to pull the full holiday bonus (100$) by cashing 5000 challenge points into 5000 ftp, so i would recommend this to anyone
You have to be patient and play (and thus fold) A LOT OF hands, but in all it is one of the easiest to multiply achieve (and best 'paying') challenges they offer imo... |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|