| Author |
Message |
IABoomer Moderator
Joined: 29 Oct 2006 Posts: 7351
|
Posted: Sun Feb 22, 2009 3:43 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| How do you act before the SB? |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
nienie23 Full House
Joined: 11 Aug 2008 Posts: 164 Location: Laval, Quebec, Canada
|
Posted: Sun Feb 22, 2009 3:59 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| IABoomer wrote: |
| How do you act before the SB? |
That is weird. I re-looked at the hand and SB is actually on BTN. It's Leggo Poker that screwed this. I tried it again with the same results. We were 9 players with 3 sitting out. Maybe that's why. Anyway, I changed it manually. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
IABoomer Moderator
Joined: 29 Oct 2006 Posts: 7351
|
Posted: Sun Feb 22, 2009 4:18 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| That hand looks pretty standard. I might consider not leading at the flop since your chances of pushing anyone off their draw are slim and leading only builds the pot and gives them better odds to chase. Plus, they did open-raise and call your three-bet, so they should have something better than 72o and you could be behind with your AKo. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
WhatASurprise Message Board Junkie
Joined: 25 Jul 2008 Posts: 2004 Location: You come at the king, you best not miss.
|
Posted: Sun Feb 22, 2009 6:19 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Don`t donk the flop. Otherwise, standard.
EV stands for Expected Value. It is a measurement for how much money you will win/lose on a given action over the long term. If the action taken is profitable, it is +EV, and if it is unprofitable, it is -EV.
Calculating EV can be done in several ways, depending on the situation. It is rather complicated, and you will not find it as valuable in limit as in NL. That is because you will have to count in bet sizes and implied odds to a higher degree. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
nienie23 Full House
Joined: 11 Aug 2008 Posts: 164 Location: Laval, Quebec, Canada
|
Posted: Sun Feb 22, 2009 7:47 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| WhatASurprise wrote: |
Don`t donk the flop. Otherwise, standard.
EV stands for Expected Value. It is a measurement for how much money you will win/lose on a given action over the long term. If the action taken is profitable, it is +EV, and if it is unprofitable, it is -EV.
Calculating EV can be done in several ways, depending on the situation. It is rather complicated, and you will not find it as valuable in limit as in NL. That is because you will have to count in bet sizes and implied odds to a higher degree. |
The flop donking? I realized it when posting the hand. I a live hand, I don't have the reflexes to count outs and figure those things. That's why I do it after with a pen a paper. After a while, I should be able to do it instantly.
As for +EV, I looked on the internet. They have tables for this but basically, it's the preflop hands that are profitable. And if I translate this into beginner's language, those preflop hands they tell you to play in books. Well, I am sticking to this. But I am definitely lacking concentration one the cards hit the board. There is a lot of stuff to take into consideration but I am getting there.
Thanks
Last edited by nienie23 on Sun Feb 22, 2009 10:01 pm; edited 1 time in total |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
suicideblonde1 Banned
Joined: 19 Feb 2008 Posts: 1975 Location: an animal trapped in a hot car
|
Posted: Sun Feb 22, 2009 7:52 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I apologise for the tone of my replies. I was tipsy and thought you were claiming to be a "math genius". Your posts are good, you're actually trying to get better. Sorry  |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
nienie23 Full House
Joined: 11 Aug 2008 Posts: 164 Location: Laval, Quebec, Canada
|
Posted: Sun Mar 15, 2009 12:07 am Post subject: |
|
|
| suicideblonde1 wrote: |
I apologise for the tone of my replies. I was tipsy and thought you were claiming to be a "math genius". Your posts are good, you're actually trying to get better. Sorry  |
Apologies accepted my dear but you look very mean on that picture.
 |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Pil Sung Straight Flush
Joined: 06 Mar 2006 Posts: 370 Location: Georgia
|
Posted: Fri Mar 20, 2009 11:09 pm Post subject: Re: Poker Math Wizz VS No folding players. LHE 0.25/0.50 |
|
|
| suicideblonde1 wrote: |
| nienie23 wrote: |
| Know your opponents. If one very passive player raises preflop, he has AA, not AK, not KK. He has AA. |
I don't play LHE, but a lot of what you say is clearly extremely stupid. This quote I've picked out is absolutely mind-blowingly dumb, but there are plenty of other examples. |
You read further than I did. I stopped at
| Quote: |
| HAND #2 Any Mathwizz can explain to my opponent that he was dominated after my preflop raise? In order to be dominated, you have to know what it means. |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
nienie23 Full House
Joined: 11 Aug 2008 Posts: 164 Location: Laval, Quebec, Canada
|
Posted: Sat Mar 21, 2009 9:13 pm Post subject: Re: Poker Math Wizz VS No folding players. LHE 0.25/0.50 |
|
|
| Pil Sung wrote: |
You read further than I did. I stopped at
| Quote: |
| HAND #2 Any Mathwizz can explain to my opponent that he was dominated after my preflop raise? In order to be dominated, you have to know what it means. |
|
Sigh!!!!! You should have read a little bit more, i.e. her last comment on this thread. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
SmellsLikeDonk Royal Flush
Joined: 12 Jan 2009 Posts: 598 Location: Shoving where it's +EV
|
Posted: Sat Mar 21, 2009 11:19 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| nienie23 wrote: |
As for +EV, I looked on the internet. They have tables for this but basically, it's the preflop hands that are profitable. And if I translate this into beginner's language, those preflop hands they tell you to play in books. Well, I am sticking to this. But I am definitely lacking concentration one the cards hit the board. There is a lot of stuff to take into consideration but I am getting there.
Thanks |
Check out the table for odds given X number of outs at this web site: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Poker_probability_(Texas_hold_%27em)#After_the_flop
(you will have to copy and paste as the direct link does not work)
When I started playing I referenced this table all the time. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
jrounds High Card
Joined: 20 Apr 2009 Posts: 4
|
Posted: Mon Apr 20, 2009 8:45 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Your analysis on 2 doesn't add up to me, though I only post to give the experts a chance to pick me apart.
"HAND #2 Any Mathwizz can explain to my opponent that he was dominated after my preflop raise? In order to be dominated, you have to know what it means. He was never dominated. He was just going for a flush and with 2 of his suit on the flop, he is there till river and will even bet it if he missed it, just in case. "
He was going for a draw but you gave him good pot odds to call.
So at the turn 2.60 was in so that means he needed 50 cents to call on the flop. .50/2.60 approximately 1/5 or 20%. He makes that flush more than 20% of the time, so he did the correct thing by calling if he didn't believe you were also trying to make it. You made a betting error by giving a flush draw a free river card after that. So even though we didn't factor in implied pot odds, it turned out we didn't need to because you were being soft on draws. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
nienie23 Full House
Joined: 11 Aug 2008 Posts: 164 Location: Laval, Quebec, Canada
|
Posted: Sun Apr 26, 2009 3:26 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| jrounds wrote: |
He was going for a draw but you gave him good pot odds to call.
So at the turn 2.60 was in so that means he needed 50 cents to call on the flop. .50/2.60 approximately 1/5 or 20%. He makes that flush more than 20% of the time, so he did the correct thing by calling if he didn't believe you were also trying to make it. You made a betting error by giving a flush draw a free river card after that. So even though we didn't factor in implied pot odds, it turned out we didn't need to because you were being soft on draws. |
You are absolutely right. I posted this 2 months ago. IABoomer got it all right. He explained what "dominated" meant, and also the effect of buying a free card. My opponent played his hand the right way. His raise on the flop just freaked me out and made me back off.
The beauty of this forum is that there is always someone ready to give advices. Now, I can spot someone trying to buy a free card and I love to do it myself and seeing opponents go into the check-call mode. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
DforDissent Royal Flush
Joined: 30 Mar 2009 Posts: 669
|
Posted: Thu Sep 10, 2009 2:19 am Post subject: Re: Poker Math Wizz VS No folding players. LHE 0.25/0.50 |
|
|
OP, you are correct that it seems lotsa folks play shorthanded limit as if they have never been exposed to the concept of "+EV hands".
But also keep in mind that with LIMIT holdem, when 6handed or less, often it isn't about the inherent hand strength, it's about POSITION, and the weakness/trickyness/readability of your opponents. I often see shorthanded LHE players who seem to consistently win and yet preflop they rarely fold -- almost always raising (or 3bet/cap!) -- but upon closer analysis I think most of these apparent-maniacs are just really good post-flop. They shut down quickly before investing too much if they have air and their opponent is "honest" and has just raised or check-raised them (for example).
So really, the problem is that the "win rate" of a hand is based on "all-in preflop" matchups, but since in LHE often the "-EV" hands are folded on a missed flop, they aren't quite so negative EV. ALSO those same bottom-rung hands have quite good implied odds due to their deceptive nature (i.e. J6o, flop comes JT6 and the preflop raiser with AJ or KJ fires the flop and the turn, and probably the river too thus allowing the guy with J6o to raise/chkraise somewhere along the way for mega-payoff).
Not saying "any two can win", but it seems like that is the case with these kind of maniacs -- short-term anyway (until the table figures out just how loose the maniac actually is, and notices the "honesty" of their post-flop play ... often the maniac will just LEAVE the table when it's clear the table is calling them down light and/or trapping thus reducing the risk/reward ratio too much). |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|